Print Сite this

Morality Obligation vs. Aspiration Comparison

Moral duty is an obligation that an individual owes and should fulfill, although it is not legally required. A charitable endeavor is an example of a moral commitment. Charity actions are encouraged by a person’s good nature rather than by the law. A country’s or organization’s legislation reinforces law-based morality. For example, most laws make it illegal to drive when intoxicated. The nature of ambition is concerned with features of policies, beliefs, and norms that may be transformed into one another. These variables become more concrete when applied to the sphere of responsibility ethics, where they take the shape of rules and options (Leiva, 2020). The ethics of accountability begins at the lowest level of suitable human accomplishment, but the character of ambition begins at the highest level.

Our experts can deliver a customized essay
tailored to your instructions
for only $13.00 $11.05/page
308 qualified specialists online
Learn more

The morality of responsibility identifies and credits brilliance as one of the potentials that donate to the optimal working of the community as well as a complete grasp of its values. Personality and asset foresee the righteousness of ambition (Abranches, 2019). For example, it may be the decency of a “good soldier,” natural distinctiveness, or a complete understanding of soldierly qualities in the army context, where honor, bravery, and sacrifice are crucial. Thus, there could be consequences of responsibility in the morality of ambition, but they are frequently muted. Furthermore, the concept of good and bad of noteworthy action is included. For example, consider the character of a soldier who is professionally working to the best of his ability. From this vantage point, an individual may not perceive their full range of talents; as an expert. The people may be viewed as insufficient—courageous instead of brave, dishonest instead of honorable—but in such cases, they are penalized for disappointment rather than disloyalty to commitment.

The morality of duty establishes the rules that must be followed in order for an initiative or institution to function well. It precisely detects the habits and actions that may obstruct an enterprise’s proper operation. The ethics of responsibility begins at the lowermost level of least appropriate human attainment; the character of desire begins at the highest level. It categorizes and admires since it shines the potentials that assist the real workings of the individuals and the overall comprehension of its standards. Moral leaders have a remarkable influence on their adherents and, eventually, societal plans. They shift followers’ needs, attitudes, tastes, and aspirations away from self-interest and toward shared interests (Bowring, 2017). Rulers with moral obligations create shared standards for typical conduct, which subsequently direct the actions of others. Such conventions can be bolstered by moral standards in which stakeholders establish rules that reward ethical behavior and penalize unethical behavior. Such actions can also be guided by imposing normative and informational costs, such as rituals, signals, and communication difficulties, to match moral behaviors with community conventions.

In the United States Navy the quality of following moral laws is one of the morality of aspirations. Both moral and legal should be followed by a military in the navy, in all situations. Two soldiers are on a quest to discover two fellows that were leading illegal business at the coast but were living among civilians. While searching, they come upon one of them among people, and they are torn between shooting him and finding another way out because they know he is armed. Firing at him might result in a barrage of bullets, endangering the people around him. The first sailor decides not to shoot because he does not want to face the consequences of murdering a civilian. After reflecting on the ethics of his work, the second military man decides not to fire a bullet, believing that it is what a decent and praiseworthy army officer should do. The second combatant has the morality of aspiration he followed both legal and moral decrees.


Abranches, A. (2019). Can hypocrisy be a virtue? Hume on the morality of princes. Ethics, Politics & Society, 2.

Bowring, M. (2017). Can I trust you? Exploring how sexual orientation disclosure affects the relationship between LGB leaders and their followers. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L’administration, 34(2), 170-181.

Leiva, E. (2020). Modelling of lithium-ion batteries is becoming viral: Were to go? Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry, 24(9), 2117-2120.

On-Time Delivery! Get your 100% customized paper
done in
as little as 3 hours
Let`s start

Cite this paper

Select style


StudyCorgi. (2022, October 11). Morality Obligation vs. Aspiration Comparison. Retrieved from


StudyCorgi. (2022, October 11). Morality Obligation vs. Aspiration Comparison.

Work Cited

"Morality Obligation vs. Aspiration Comparison." StudyCorgi, 11 Oct. 2022,

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

1. StudyCorgi. "Morality Obligation vs. Aspiration Comparison." October 11, 2022.


StudyCorgi. "Morality Obligation vs. Aspiration Comparison." October 11, 2022.


StudyCorgi. 2022. "Morality Obligation vs. Aspiration Comparison." October 11, 2022.


StudyCorgi. (2022) 'Morality Obligation vs. Aspiration Comparison'. 11 October.

This paper was written and submitted to our database by a student to assist your with your own studies. You are free to use it to write your own assignment, however you must reference it properly.

If you are the original creator of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal.