Multiculturalism is the state’s ideological tool or the state’s domination technique in nationalizing, communalizing the people in Canada, and derailing various struggles for equality. Historians and political enthusiasts spent sleepless nights focused on assessing the validity of the statement. Some consider the rule of multicultural nationalism, communalism, and racism as the country’s myth, while others support the idea of claiming the fact that the statement is true. Europeans claim that the ideology has failed, but remain embedded and go against the trend. However, their commentators warn that multiculturalism is appealing to the people because of the radicalism depicted by idealism. In short, the discussion revolves around the perspectives of two super parties, Europe and Canada. This ideology is manifested by eliminating ethnicity and obscuring racism, as depicted by the community.
Thobani and Bannerji describe Canada’s racial and colonial foundations in a way that is changing with the modern thinking of Canada’s multiculturalism. Thobani wanted to eliminate Canada’s white supremacy because he discussed the Canadian people’s white supremacy. Incorporating modern multiculturalism into modern Canada reveals a transformation of Thobani’s thinking. In his book, Thobani explains how modern multiculturalism was born. Saving the whites, which was prevalent in the colonial era, was a daunting process.
The liberalization of modern Canada was triggered by several ideas that produced positive multiculturalism. High demand for French-speaking countries in Quebec, pressure from the Aboriginal community, and the formation of a movement centered on gender, social and cultural considerations are some of the key factors driving the transformation of Canada’s identity in 1960. Evaluation of Thobani’s claims explaining how Canada’s identity arose is very much of the idea that multiculturalism was based on Canada’s colonial and racial foundations to be recognized based on multiculturalism. Meanwhile, Benerji talked about treating all Canadian migrants as a cultural group and focusing on preventing cases of discrimination from being reported in such cases. Benerge’s idea was to eradicate the early conflicts between the French and British colonies and make Canada a country dominated by equality rather than discrimination. Therefore, this idea changed Canada’s so-called racial and colonial foundations by encouraging the emergence of multiculturalism. Critically, as argued, racism is widespread in most Third World countries, as it happened in colonial Canada.
Throughout the multilingual agenda, multiculturalism was the term Trudeau proposed as a formula for social self-interest. The main reason for Trudeau’s idea of fighting radicalism and separatism in Quebec led to the enforcement of federal language law. Multiculturalism was a way to cool opposition to nationalism and promote victory in the Liberal Party’s elections in the next election. It was a way to get a minority voter into the ruling party. This is because multiculturalism did not threaten Canadian English-speaking voters. It had no immediate effect and was an excellent political tool to counter France’s demand for special approval in Canada. But politics had a revolutionary symbolic meaning in building a new political system neither British nor French-dominated.
The main goal of multicultural politics was to transform politics from nationalists to multicultural politics, including even Canadian minorities. In addition, multinational policies have helped ensure equality for all in Canada. Through the Secretary of State, they say that after the observed policies are implemented, the purpose of the multicultural program is to give all citizens equal opportunities and how different groups develop and express cultural values. Part of Canada’s identity reported promoting national cohesion and equal sharing of resources by helping out. Multicultural policy has led to government support in several ways.
First, to help all ethnic societies within Canadian societies that have shown patience without hesitation by developing methods and solutions to unite Canadians. Second, helping all ethical and social clusters overcome the traditional challenge of full integration into Canadian society. Ultimately, it is about promoting innovative encounters and connections between all Canadian cultural groups. The government should help immigrants learn at least one recognized Canadian language to integrate into Canadian society as a full member. Since 1971, the policy has changed several times, primarily with the four objectives of building a unified community. This perception of political importance relied on government funding. Approximately $ 200 million was funded solely to maintain English and French education and culture during the first decade of policy implementation.
In 1972, the Ministry of Multiculturalism was established to help apply comprehensive policies and other relevant agenda items. The government-sponsored events aimed at supporting cultural minorities in civil rights, independence of cultural distinctions, equality, nationality, newcomers and cultural differences. In addition, the ministry was tasked with overseeing formal weaknesses between law and government, and ethnic authorities were established to participate in the decision-making process. An example of this organization was the Canadian Advisory Council on Multiculturalism (CCCM), founded in 1973 and later renamed the Canadian National Cultural Council. (CEC)
The institutionalization of multicultural politics in the 1980s was increasing. The transition to this policy coincides with a period of challenge for national cultural recognition. In most industrialized metropolises, the obligation to settle has quickly changed the structure of the population strikingly. At this time, Canada began witnessing the emergence of many individuals and communities that facilitated the idea of resistance. The government has focused on supporting the official revolution to lead Canadian society to the new reality of increasing immigration from other countries to its own country. Another change was a new anti-discrimination program law to eliminate the social and cultural differences that separate Canada’s marginal and ethnic societies.
Today, many countries worldwide believe that multiculturalism has failed because ethnic relations in various states are often associated with stresses and problems. In particular, the article by Banting and Kymlicka demonstrates that anti-immigrant parties and riots take place in France, Australia, Denmark, Austria, and the Netherlands. However, it is impossible to mention that Canada follows the same approach. On the contrary, this country keeps providing various ethnic groups with assistance and required resources to ensure that these individuals can become fully-fledged society members. In addition to that, Canada’s unchanged attitude is present because there is no evidence that major political parties offer to abolish multiculturalism. These facts represent an argument that Canada does not follow other states’ approaches, while the following paragraphs will reveal that the statement is valid because the country keeps implementing multiculturalism irrespective of various accompanying problems.
Canada is considered a country of immigrants due to the cultural diversity of its citizens. Cultural diversity is always Canada’s national identity as a country. New challenges facing Canada for multicultural policies are cultural conflict and the socio-economy of immigrants. Over time, we have learned that cultural conflicts are the number one cause of conflict between Canadian communities. When the policy was passed, violence broke out in Quebec between the French and British communities in Canada. This happened because Quebec is Canada’s only French-speaking state. Quebec has always sought autonomy through its own identity to claim its right to establish its own country. Equal integration presents many challenges, especially in the areas of education, housing and employment. For example, if an immigrant’s communication skills lead to poor English proficiency, the immigrant may miss a job.
Governments need to increase the money available to migrants to settle down faster and adapt to new lives more quickly. Immigrants are discriminated against when they arrive in Canada because of their poor life. The government needs to increase the funds allocated to each immigrant. Most of them rely on their neighbors to support their food, money, or other basic needs. Due to their poor living conditions, they are exposed to discrimination, prostitution and harassment. This type of discrimination may cause immigrants to believe they are different and avoid adapting to new cultures. Multiculturalism will not succeed unless all people in Canadian society feel the same and welcome it.
Language integration is another issue to be addressed as it is the most questioned anti-multicultural policy by critics. French speakers in Quebec and English speakers in other parts of Canada have different cultures. Each side seeks to maintain historical and cultural beliefs that can lead to violence and discrimination. The government should amend the Multicultural Policy Act to suit both issues according to cultural beliefs and security. By migrants, the government does not feel that the leading causes of unemployment and poverty are caused by employment on behalf of migrants, by creating jobs and helping those in need in the country. The migrants must be guaranteed that they will not to be threatened.
The government should amend immigration laws to energize them and ensure open immigration policies. Through these changes, Canadians will have a long-term response to criticisms of multiculturalism from their people and immigrants. It would help if they made sure that all migrants have food security and other basic needs. Many refugees engage in prostitution and other dangerous work to support their families. Critics use this challenge to say that Canada is moving to the ghetto country to increase the number of families on the street, and prostitution is also growing at an alarming rate. This problem creates uncertainty and destroys Canada’s pride in its people. Also, the government needs to allow migrants to reunite their families to adapt to the new culture as a family and help each other. When immigrants cannot take their families to Canada, they avoid adapting to unique lifestyles for fear that they may affect their families when they return to their homeland.
York’s Multicultural Week is the most crucial week for Canadians. For all participants in Big Week, participants should pursue the moments of life by learning, experiencing, eating, and listening to the cultural lifestyles of others and experiencing them alone. The best part of York’s Multicultural Week is the wide variety of food, unimaginable drinks, and great people in cultural clothing. But to answer the question, this week’s Multicultural Week in York wants all participants to remember the best week and party of their life forever. Participants want to wear their cultural clothing and prepare traditional meals to test and experience the traditional lifestyles they grew up with.
In summary, multiculturalism is a tool used to nationalize, localize and disguise racism in Canada. Some countries have worked to eradicate Canada’s multiculturalism, but all are in vain. Multiculturalism has always been, and remains to be Canada’s national identity. Multiculturalism, as explained, wiped out the notion of racism and saved whiteness through a movement focused on the Aboriginal community, Quebec’s French-speaking world, and gender, race, and culture. It is achieved through a rigorous process of age. Multiculturalism is shaped by York’s Multicultural Week, where people of different races come together to show unity by eating and drinking. Therefore, multiculturalism is Canada’s national identity.