Key Issues in the Peer Review Cycle
In my opinion, one of the primary points in the peer-reviewed cycle is the research because it is the stage that requires a long and detailed analysis, which gives the possibility to proceed to the subsequent stages of writing a scientific work. Besides, the submission of a particular publication to an editor also plays an important role. This person checks an almost finished paper, regulates the time of its publication, and verifies the reliability of all the data. The fundamental difference between an editor and peer reviewer is that the first studies the content of an article, as well as checks the novelty and finds out whether the declared topic corresponds to the written sample. As Paltridge (2017) notes, a peer reviewer does not contact the author. He has no information about who wrote a particular paper, and the author of the work does not know the peer reviewer either.
Evidence of Peer-Reviewed Article
The article chosen for the analysis is about a life-work balance and flexible work schedules that may help in organizing the work and rest process (Galea, Houkes, & De Rijk, 2014). According to the information studied, it is possible to claim that this article was verified by the expert since it has all the necessary evidence of this procedure. First, the list of references is checked and edited. Secondly, the work is published in a well-known scientific journal, which indicates that the paper has passed the necessary verification. Peer-reviewed information can be found in various databases, which contain useful data about everything that a person needs to check a particular paper: the name of the editor and publisher, as well as the information about the place and date of publication.
References
Galea, C., Houkes, I., & De Rijk, A. (2014). An insider’s point of view: How a system of flexible working hours helps employees to strike a proper balance between work and personal life. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(8), 1090-1111.
Paltridge, B. (2017). Learning to do peer review. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.