Pepsi Co’s Diversification Strategy in 2008

Introduction

Strategic management is considered to be one of the basic elements that allow a business company to achieve success in its operations in both domestic and international markets (Thompson, 2001, p. 24; Thompson, Strickland, Gamble, 2009, p. 37). However, even such giants of the global business as Pepsi Co. sometimes face diversification strategy issues in their developmental initiatives, and a comprehensive restructuring and strategy re-formulation become necessary to overcome the emerging consequences.

Pepsi Co’s Strategy

SWOT Analysis

Thus, to see the roots of the issues experienced by Pepsi Co. between 2007 and 2008, it is necessary to carry out the SWOT analysis for the company:

Fig.1 Pepsi Co. SWOT Analysis.

Strengths Weaknesses
1. Diversified assortment of products and operations in over 20 segments of beverage and snack markets 1. Weak projection initiatives that promised Pepsi Co. revenue increase but resulted in the need for strategic restructuring
2. Successful acquisition and merger policy bringing the company billions of dollars (e.g. Quaker Oats $13.9 billion acquisition) 2. Staying behind Coca-Cola market share (31.4% and 41.6% respectively)
Opportunities Threats
1. “Power of One” unification strategy that submits diversified goals of Pepsi Co.’s members to the joint corporate goal 1. Strong competition in the industry formed by Coca-Cola, Cadbury Schweppes, and Nestle
2. Comprehensive restructuring of the company implemented to reduce the number of reporting segments and ease the process of accounting 2. Risk of Pepsi Co.’ projections being false and not allowing the company to have expected rates of revenue growth

Acquisitions and Mergers

Thus, the strategy of Pepsi Co. regarding acquisitions and mergers is one of the strengths of the company according to the SWOT analysis. The examples of successful acquisitions of Pepsi Co. include:

  1. 1980s Mug root beer, 7UP International, and Smartfood ready-to-eat popcorn acquisitions;
  2. 1990s Walker’s and Smith’s Crisps, Gamesa, and SunChips acquisitions;
  3. 2001 Quaker Oats acquisition;
  4. 2000s Sandora Juice, Lucky Juice, Star Foods acquisitions;

Industry Driving Forces and Porter’s 5 Forces Model

Further on, to better understand Pepsi Co.’s industry positions, 5 forces Porter’s model can be quite helpful (Thompson, 2001, p. 289):

Porter’s 5 Forces Model.
Fig.1 Porter’s 5 Forces Model.

Thus, one can see that the rivalry among existing firms in the industry is the central driving force, and Pepsi Co. faces this rivalry at especially severe rates as far as it tries to catch up and exceed the Coca-Cola market share, while also trying not to stay far behind losing its positions to its other competitors, i. e. Cadbury Schweppes and Nestle. Further on, Pepsi Co. tries to cope with a high power of suppliers by establishing long-term relationships with the latter.

The power of buyers is crucial for the industry with such great competition, and this factor is one of the major threats for Pepsi Co., as well as the threat of substitute products provided by its competitors. At the same time, the threat of new entrants is rather low in the beverage industry as there are quite high operating margins and capital requirements.

Recommendations

So, Pepsi Co. faces major issues in the beverage industry, i. e. the rivalry within the industry and the strong buyer power both conditioned by the fierce industry competition. To cope with these issues, it is recommended that Pepsi Co. should:

  1. Continue diversification of products to cope with the competition and threat of substitutes in the market;
  2. Monitor buyer satisfaction levels;
  3. Implement customer-friendly programs to increase buyer satisfaction levels.

If properly implemented, these steps are expected to strengthen Pepsi Co.’s market position and enable the company to develop competitive advantages in the beverage and snack industries.

Works Cited

Thompson, Arthur, A. J. Strickland, and John E. Gamble. Crafting and Executing Strategy: The Quest for Competitive Advantage Concepts and Cases. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2009. Print.

Thompson, John. Understanding corporate strategy. Cengage Learning EMEA, 2001. Print.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2021, December 14). Pepsi Co’s Diversification Strategy in 2008. https://studycorgi.com/pepsi-cos-diversification-strategy-in-2008/

Work Cited

"Pepsi Co’s Diversification Strategy in 2008." StudyCorgi, 14 Dec. 2021, studycorgi.com/pepsi-cos-diversification-strategy-in-2008/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2021) 'Pepsi Co’s Diversification Strategy in 2008'. 14 December.

1. StudyCorgi. "Pepsi Co’s Diversification Strategy in 2008." December 14, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/pepsi-cos-diversification-strategy-in-2008/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Pepsi Co’s Diversification Strategy in 2008." December 14, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/pepsi-cos-diversification-strategy-in-2008/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2021. "Pepsi Co’s Diversification Strategy in 2008." December 14, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/pepsi-cos-diversification-strategy-in-2008/.

This paper, “Pepsi Co’s Diversification Strategy in 2008”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.