StudyCorgi Philosophy

Philosophy of Social Science and Education Research

Introduction

In this section of the book, Nel Noddings (1998) discusses the main philosophical assumptions underlying education research as well as social science. This question is of great importance to scholars who examine the nature of scientific knowledge. The main purpose of this chapter is to show how theoretical views on epistemology can affect the activities of social or educational researchers. This paper will be aimed at examining various issues such as the concept of falsifiability and the use of various research paradigms.

We will write a
custom essay
specifically for you

for only $16.05 $11/page
308 certified writers online
Learn More

The understanding of these topics is important for designing empirical studies. This is why readers should not overlook these issues. On the whole, it is possible to argue that education research and social science cannot be judged according to the standards that are traditionally applied to naturalistic sciences like physics. It should be kept in mind that these areas of study incorporate questions that cannot be examined with the help of naturalistic research techniques.

Summary and the main arguments

Overall, Nel Noddings’ main point is that researchers should remember that theories and models, which are incorporated in social sciences or educational research, do not always enable scholars to make accurate predictions. In some cases, they should help scholars gain a deeper understanding of various behavioral social, or educational phenomena. The following bullet points give a brief over view of the chapter

  1. Karl Popper’s views on scientific knowledge;
  2. The notion of progress in science;
  3. Qualitative and quantitative methodologies;
  4. The complexities of narrative research.

At first, the author focuses on Karl Popper’s concept falsifiability. This notion implies that a hypothesis or a theory can be called scientific only if it can be confirmed or refuted in an empirical way (Noddings). As a rule, this requirement is critical for social sciences. Nevertheless, this standard is not always applicable to social sciences or psychology. For instance, one can mention Freudian views on the development of personality. Similarly, Piaget’s model of developmental stages cannot always be falsified. Nevertheless, they have been critical for the development of psychology as a science.

Additionally, the writer discusses the peculiarities of qualitative and quantitative methods. Overall, quantitative methods are primarily aimed at testing a specific hypothesis or a theory. This approach is helpful when it is necessary to make generalizations. In contrast, qualitative approach is more useful when one has to explore the opinions of people and understand their major concerns. Under such circumstances, one often has to adopt a narrative approach. Still, it is not consistent with the principles of fallibility. Furthermore, this approach is not suitable for testing a scientific claim.

Finally, it is critical to remember that the data generated in the course of a social or educational research may give rise to various interpretations. In many cases, this interpretation can depend on the personality of the researcher, especially his/her values and attitudes. In contrast, natural sciences include more objective criteria which prevent a person from the misinterpretation of data.

Conclusion

Overall, this discussion indicates that social and educational sciences differ significantly from other areas of knowledge. In many cases, conventional standards of validity may not be applied to various studies are supposed to explore the experiences and attitudes of respondents. This reading has enabled me to understand the difficulties that educational and social researches have to encounter. These are the main details that can be singled out.

Get your
100% original paper
on any topic

done in as little as
3 hours
Learn More

Reference List

Noddings, N. (1998). Philosophy of Education. New York, NY: Westview Press.

Print Сite this

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2021, February 21). Philosophy of Social Science and Education Research. Retrieved from https://studycorgi.com/philosophy-of-social-science-and-education-research/

Work Cited

"Philosophy of Social Science and Education Research." StudyCorgi, 21 Feb. 2021, studycorgi.com/philosophy-of-social-science-and-education-research/.

1. StudyCorgi. "Philosophy of Social Science and Education Research." February 21, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/philosophy-of-social-science-and-education-research/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Philosophy of Social Science and Education Research." February 21, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/philosophy-of-social-science-and-education-research/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2021. "Philosophy of Social Science and Education Research." February 21, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/philosophy-of-social-science-and-education-research/.

References

StudyCorgi. (2021) 'Philosophy of Social Science and Education Research'. 21 February.

Copy to clipboard

This paper was written and submitted to our database by a student to assist your with your own studies. You are free to use it to write your own assignment, however you must reference it properly.

If you are the original creator of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal.

Psst... Stuck with your
assignment? 😱
Susan
Online
Psst... Stuck with your assignment? 😱
Do you need an essay to be done?
Yes
What type of assignment 📝 do you need?
Yes
How many pages (words) do you need? Let's see if we can help you!
Yes