Introduction
Pricing strategy amongst firms is a complex undertaking, primarily determined by market structure, production costs, and product differentiation. Macroeconomic models are at the heart of price-setting behavior, as they adequately analyze the market and address the firm’s competitive position. High price fluctuations can cause a nominal shock to firms, leading to insolvency and, ultimately, extinction if the company lacks a strategic price-setting model (Pitschner, 2020).
A keen analysis of production, the firm’s market, and strategic interactions between companies helps formulate models that provide both short- and long-term financial solutions for a firm. Price-setting can either be internally or externally instigated (Rudanko, 2022). Market structure is at the heart of the internal factors leading to price setting, while government policies are the non-changeable external factors.
The internal environment leads to nominal shocks if a firm still needs to prepare a model to mitigate the fluctuations. Observable effects of minor shocks among firms include staff layoffs, company extinctions, and a decline in the economy, as countries become increasingly dependent on exports rather than less expensive internal manufacturing. In the manufacturing sector, exports serve as a tool for local companies to set prices, but overreliance on exports paralyzes local production (Basu, 2019, p. 18). This report addresses the drivers of price fluctuations and mechanisms to keep price changes manageable, thereby curbing the adverse effects of high prices on firms.
Rigidity is a common phenomenon affecting price setting. For instance, in the United States, companies listed on stock exchanges are protected from high price fluctuations imposed by market rigidity, which creates price binding. This case requires the government to spend its resources to subsidize the prices. However, the government’s limited shock absorption limits the number of firms operating within its jurisdiction.
Market structures such as monopoly and oligopoly do not exist. Perfect competition and monopolistic competition, which impose barriers to market entry and exit, are predominant. This paper addresses the complex price-setting strategy, which involves a keen study of the company’s output and the profits it earns. The report also addresses the overall impacts of customers, competitors, and the government on market prices, enabling intensive, results-driven analysis.
Types of Market Structures and Their Effects on Pricing
Market structure is the aggregation of related firms within a specific economic and geographical setting. The collection, which is dictated by the firm’s products, creates a connection between firms, bringing price into the equation. Markets differ in how products enter and exit. For instance, some may experience barriers, while others enjoy unhindered access.
The forms and external factors determine prices in a free-market entry and exit. Government policies play a small role in price modifications and fluctuations (Ma et al., 2021)—the presence or absence of competition within a market determines its price-setting strategy. Most firms do not enjoy a monopoly due to the high product demand. Competition is inexplicably intertwined with production, consumption, and pricing strategies.
Competition also plays a major role in determining a firm’s market structure, as relative prices and the availability of other options directly affect pricing strategies. Market structure is a direct component of the goods produced (Paine, 2021). Perishability in interest rates plays a massive role in pricing, as it dictates the quality of products over time. For instance, food manufacturing firms are more vulnerable to price fluctuations than automobile firms because of the nature of their products.
The high production costs necessitate that firms price commodities within a specific price range to avoid losses (Basu, 2019, p. 21). Several customers, also called tee demand, are at the center of the pricing strategy, since all firms are profit-oriented and revenues keep their operations afloat. High demand for products drives up prices, as the imbalance between demand and supply creates a bidding war among customers. On the other hand, low demand leads to low commodity prices, resulting in losses for the firm.
Market structures are classified based on the principles they operate on, the nature of their product, and their economies of scale. In any economy, principles are vital to ensure firms generate revenues that cover production costs and ensure customer satisfaction through a non-exploitative approach. Four market structures exist in any economy: perfect competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and monopoly.
Perfect Competition
A perfect competition market structure is a balanced design due to the high demand and supply of products. An increased number of buyers and sellers characterizes an ideal competition structure. The products are in excess due to the high number of producers and sellers competing. In perfect competition, no seller has exceptional market power; therefore, buyers choose products based on product quality rather than the seller’s reputation.
In a realistic world, customer loyalty is critical; buyers purchase products from their preferred sellers. If a single seller earns more loyalty through satisfaction, they automatically have a higher demand for their products, making the perfect competition market structure remain theoretical rather than practical. For perfect competition to occur, the firms ‘ goods and services must be identical (Goerke, 2022). This similar nature gives any seller the leverage to sell their products.
The firm’s primary aim in a perfect competition market structure is profit maximization rather than competition (Kreps, 2020). Since the produce on sale is homogeneous, the firms aim to maximize revenue by offering buyers a variety of products to take advantage of economies of scale. A perfectly competitive market structure lacks barriers to entry and exit, as free entry and exit are guaranteed. Uniform prices characterize a perfect competition market structure because products are homogeneous. Moreover, the need for customer preference, which is more theoretical than practical, promotes uniform pricing amongst the firms involved.
Monopolistic Competition
In the real world, a monopolistic competition market structure occurs. As assumed in perfect competition, product homogeneity is rarely achievable. Additionally, customer preference is an internal factor promoted by satisfaction and the quality of products and services. In monopolistic competition, there are many sellers and buyers, but the market is characterized by product differentiation. Due to the marginal differences in resources, sellers in a monopolistic competition market can price their goods differently depending on their market power and economic superiority (Mieszkowska et al., 2022).
Unlike perfect competition, sellers are the price setters in a monopolistic market. The selling firms use product differentiation to promote specialty, leading to the rise of specific products (Kramer, Krebs, and Schmidt, 2021). Lack of product uniformity gives sellers the power to raise prices at will. Monopolistic competition, however, is characterized by free entry and exit from the market. The most distinctive feature of a monopolistic market is that the firm controls output, since differentiation necessitates output restriction.
Monopolistic Market
A large demand-supply imbalance occurs in a monopolistic market. This market structure characterizes a market with many buyers and few sellers. As a result of the imbalance between sellers and buyers, a single supplier sells goods and services to many buyers.
The firm that takes over the market is referred to as the monopoly, which controls the prices of its commodities to its convenience. A monopoly sets the output level, price, and supply of items to its customers regardless of demand (Turner, 2019). Monopolistic markets are promoted by barriers to entry, resulting from government policies and political interactions.
Though scarce, a monopolistic market structure is aimed at profit maximization, as the seller can influence the market to their advantage. It is the critical tool that induces price fluctuations in a monopolistic market (Goerke, 2022). In its price-setting policy, a monopolistic market determines that the marginal revenue equals the marginal cost, commonly called the break-even point. The break-even point is the point at which there is neither profit nor loss. Firms either increase or decrease supply to maximize returns in the market.
Oligopoly
In an oligopoly, a few firms exhibit product differentiation. Usually, there are fewer firms than buyers, so they compete to gain market dominance. In an oligopoly market, sellers can collaborate rather than compete to maximize profits in a less crowded market (Crawford, 2021). Compared to a monopolistic market, buyers enjoy a wider variety of products and fewer price fluctuations in an oligopoly. Supply is higher in an oligopoly than in a monopoly because no single firm wants market power (Aïd, Dumitrescu, and Tankov, 2020).
To influence the market, firms need to collaborate in a perfectly competitive market; therefore, it is considered a more lenient structure than a monopoly. Models were developed to define the price strategy that maximizes profits while reducing costs. In an oligopoly, entry to the market is restricted by barriers intended to regulate supply and output.
Pricing Strategy in Different Market Structures
Different market structures have diverse price strategies in the effort of profit maximization. The methods differ based on demand, since the number of customers determines the market’s revenue. To ensure firm growth, pricing strategy is critical, as it dictates production levels, production costs, output, and economies of scale (Hennecke, 2019).
Different market structures adopt different techniques depending on their openness to trade, the level of competition amongst their counterparts, and their efforts to make profits. The level of competitive ability among the four in the perfect competition market structure makes the price-setting strategy dependent solely on profits (Shen, Cao, and Xu, 2020). On the other hand, the market operates under barriers, such as monopoly and oligopoly, and uses output and price decisions to set prices for its goods and services.
Barriers to Market Entry and Exit
In economics, free market entry is the condition in which a firm can enter the market to produce or sell goods without restrictions. In perfect and monopolistic competition, free-market entry guarantees an unlimited number of buyers and sellers of a particular product. The pricing strategy in the four market functions depends on the firm’s profits, output, and price decisions.
Exit from oligopoly market structures is restricted because each firm, amongst the few, is mandated to produce a specific product, which would create a significant market gap if it left the structure (Hinterhuber, 2019). The firms already in the oligopoly are usually established, making it difficult for new firms to enter a market that is already complete. Pricing in firms in an oligopoly market structure is a collaborative approach, as the associated firms reach consensus on regulating the output and supply of their goods and services.
Output Decisions
In most market functions, the quality and quantity of output determine their success and revenues. The restricted market functions, such as the consumer-based monopoly and oligopoly models, are proposed to increase their competitiveness. One aspect identical to the oligopolistic and monopolistic models is the output decision. To control price in the market function, comparing your product with competitors’ products is critical (Smith, 2017).
Looking at the unique strengths of another rival’s output helps a firm gauge its weaknesses and devise a mitigation plan to improve product quality, thereby increasing demand and, in turn, prices (Kramer, Krebs, and Schmidt, 2021). In perfect competition, the price-taker model dominates its functions. Since there is no product differentiation, each firm is a price taker and must accept the standard price at which it sells its products.
Therefore, the quantity of output is the distinctive feature of the firm’s revenues. The brand name is a critical feature in a firm’s production. A firm’s outward image in a restricted market determines its ability to monopolize it.
Building a strong brand can increase demand for a firm’s products, giving the company the power to dominate the market by releasing small quantities at higher prices. To retain customer loyalty, firms set output prices above average cost of production. In an oligopoly, firms have low production efficiency because they must produce at high rates to match demand, since there are fewer sellers than buyers.
Price Decisions
Although the monopolistic model stresses that firms cannot control prices, they can still directly affect output and exercise price control in response to demand fluctuations. Unlike a monopoly, firms in perfect competition lack the power to control prices due to a lack of market power and the inability to control quality or quantity (Blind et al., 2022). The market function dictates the marginal costs among firms. For instance, two firms producing identical products would be confronted with increasing their marginal cost by the emergence of a third, more powerful brand (Kyle, 2019). The price and output policy determines price strategies in oligopolistic or duopolistic markets, which calls for a consensus between identical firms. Through perfect collusion, the firms decide on the standard price for their commodities since they hold market power and have customer loyalty.
How Can a Firm Affect Market Prices
Pricing strategy and objectives give a firm theoretical knowledge of the impact of its output quality on price. The models, however, do not look into the factors that affect external market prices. To influence the prices of a product or a service, a firm should address the external environment, including the customers and its competitors (Kniazeva & Baskin, 2023). Customer reviews are critical to compete successfully and ultimately venture into the international market (Song, Zhang, and Zhang, 2021). Since other firms also have strategies for competition, carrying out a SWOT analysis on trials would help a firm outcompete its rivals.
Customers
Customer response is at the forefront of a company’s success. Before setting a price on a commodity, the firm’s internal audits should brainstorm on probable customer feedback. Feedback is dependent on the product’s value and quality. Price strategy is risky since it can be intertwined with losses (Bozkurt & Gligor, 2019). For instance, when lowering the process to increase demand to achieve a monopoly, firms should ensure quality to clients to avoid counterfeiting risks. By looking into how sensitive its customers are, a firm can adopt the price elasticity principle, which is the ratio of the quantity demanded to the change in price. Adopting price elasticity to respond to customers guarantees success in a firm’s pricing strategy.
Competitors
A firm’s success depends on its response to competition. Price fluctuations among competitors shape the strategy of a new firm. In markets that lack natural monopolies, such as perfect competition and monopolistic competition, the competing firms are more likely due to unrestricted access. In an oligopoly, the competing firms range between 3 and 5, while in a monopoly, a single firm dominates the market (Jaśkowski & Czarnigowska, 2019). Since customer retention and loyalty are critical for a firm’s success, a company should set prices that are reasonable to its clients to promote loyalty (Song, Zhang, and Zhang, 2021). With guaranteed quality, even increasing the prices will not cause the firm to lose customers, hence gaining power in the market.
Strategic Interaction between Companies
In free-entry markets, there are functions, such as monopolistic competition and perfect competition. Firms are profit-oriented and work together due to the homogeneity of products (Lipatov, Neven, and Siotis, 2020). In highly competitive markets such as monopolies and oligopolies, the interaction between companies determines a firm’s market power and ability to influence prices. If the firm sells identical and homogenous products in an oligopolistic market function, the firm can collaboratively engage as a price-setting strategist(Wiencierz, Röttger, and Fuhrmann, 2021). Too many firms may merge into one unit and differentiate their functions, making them reach a uniform price (Khajeh et al., 2020). Either way, both firms can agree on their prices and work separately. Becoming perfect substitutes is a competitive method of setting prices. Here, one firm intentionally lowers its prices to increase its demand and attain monopolistic power.
Conclusion
Price setting is a complex process involving both internal and external factors. From the discussion, the four market functions, oligopoly, monopoly, monopolistic competition, and perfect competition, affect pricing through decisions, price decisions, customers, and competition. Therefore, customer loyalty, a quality function, is critical to achieve practical price setting.
Moreover, to attain the desired price changes, the paper discusses the price take models, which advise on the optimum market conditions before risking raising or lowering the prices. Restricted market functions under government jurisdiction have more power to change their process than unrestricted market functions. The report provides a complete analysis of the impact of price changes in monopolistic markets and how interaction in restricted markets would lead to an effective pricing strategy.
Reference List
Aïd, R., Dumitrescu, R. and Tankov, P. (2020) ‘The entry and exit game in the electricity markets: A mean-field game approach’, arXiv Preprint arXiv:2004.14057.
Basu, S. (2019) ‘Are price-cost markups rising in the United States? A discussion of the evidence, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(3), 3–22.
Bozkurt, S. and Gligor, D. (2019) ‘Customers’ behavioral responses to unfavourable pricing errors: The role of perceived deception, dissatisfaction and price consciousness’, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 36(6), pp. 760–771.
Blind, K., Pohlisch, J. and Rauber, J. (2022) “Patenting and standardization: Similarities and differences based on firms’ strategic motives and experienced barriers,” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 65, p. 101699.
Crawford, T.W. (2021) ‘Selective accommodation in great power competition and U.S. grand strategy‘, The Power to Divide, pp. 182–210.
Goerke, L. (2022) Partisan competition authorities, cournot‐oligopoly, and endogenous market structure. Southern Economic Journal, 89(1), pp.238–270.
Hennecke, I. (2019) ‘Implementing a structured pricing strategy approach‘, Pricing Strategy Implementation, pp. 92–99.
Hinterhuber, A. (2019) ‘Implementing pricing strategies,’ Pricing Strategy Implementation, pp. 11–21.
Jaśkowski, P. and Czarnigowska, A. (2019) ‘Contractor’s bid pricing strategy: A model with correlation among competitors’ prices‘, Open Engineering, 9(1), pp. 159–166.
Khajeh, H. et al. (2020) A new local market structure for meeting customer-level flexibility needs. In 2020 International Conference on Smart Energy Systems and Technologies (SEST)(pp. 1–6). IEEE.
Kniazeva, M. and Baskin, E. (2023) SWOT analysis. SAGE Publications.
Kramer, A., Krebs, V. and Schmidt, M. (2021) Strictly and Γ-robust counterparts of electricity market models: Perfect competition and Nash–Cournot equilibria’, Operations Research Perspectives, 8, p.100197.
Kreps, D.M. (2020) ‘The competitive firm and Perfectcompetition‘, A Course in Microeconomic Theory, pp. 263–298.
Kyle, A.S. (2019) Market structure, information, futures markets, and price formation. In International Agricultural Trade (pp. 45–64). CRC Press.
Lipatov, V., Neven, D. and Siotis, G. (2020) ‘Preempting the entry of Near perfect substitutes‘, Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 17(1), pp. 194–210.
Ma, J. et al. (2021) ‘Pricing strategy and coordination of automobile manufacturers based on government intervention and carbon emission reduction‘, Energy Policy, 148, p. 111919.
Paine. S.R. (2021) ‘Market entry, exit, and Antitrust Law’, Health Care Finance, Economics, and Policy for Nurses.
Mieszkowska, N. et al. (2022) ‘A study on monopolistic competition‘, Journal of Economic Research & Reviews, 2(2).192-194.
Pitschner, S. (2020) ‘How do firms set prices? Narrative evidence from corporate filings’, European Economic Review, 124, p. 103406.
Rudanko, L. (2022) ‘Price setting with Customer Capital: Sales, teasers, and rigidity’, Working paper (Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia).
Shen, B., Cao, Y. and Xu, X. (2020) ‘Product line design and quality differentiation for green and non-green products in a supply chain‘, International Journal of Production Research, 58(1), pp.148–164.
Song, Y., Zhang, X. and Zhang, M. (2021) ‘The influence of environmental regulation on industrial structure upgrading: Based on the strategic interaction behaviour of environmental regulation among local governments’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170, p.120930.
Smith, T.J. (2017). Pricing strategy: Setting price levels, managing price discounts, & establishing price structures. Cengage Learning.
Turner, J.R. (2019) ‘Monopoly and monopoly price‘, Introduction to Economics, pp. 582–601.
Wiencierz, C., Röttger, U. and Fuhrmann, C. (2021) ‘Agile cooperation between communication agencies and companies, International Journal of Strategic Communication, 15(2), pp. 144–158.