Introduction
The life cycle of a project determines the stages through which it passes during the creation process and includes the period from initiation to completion. Schmidt identified five life cycles for the project, which follow one another in the project creation process. There are predictive, iterative, incremental, agile, and hybrid life cycles (Burmistrov et al., 2018). Each type has its peculiarities, and one can choose a specific cycle type for a particular project. The requirements have been considered to identify the most appropriate process for the Kitchen Heaven Project, and it has been determined that the iterative life cycle is the most suitable choice.
Project Lifecycle Stages
It was essential to start with the life cycle of a project. First, it is a way from the beginning to the end of the project, through which the manager can control the work (Dalcher, 2020). Splitting is also important for the quality of the final product, as it allows you to focus on individual details of the work. For example, the project can be improved using different management life cycle models (Burmistrov et al., 2018).
Project Lifecycle Types
Since Schmidt has identified five life cycles, one can focus on a brief description of each. The projected life cycle is of a specific size and is characterized by preliminary planning. This method is linear, which allows the manager to control changes promptly.
The next cycle is iterative, involving repetitive processes of project planning, execution, and evaluation. Each iteration depends on the previous one, but as it progresses, it provides flexibility. The incremental cycle is characterized by more miniature stages, allowing for earlier project implementation feedback. A flexible process is focused on cooperation and project adaptation, where client participation plays an important role (Burmistrov et al., 2018). Finally, the hybrid life cycle combines elements from other cycles, drawing on the strengths of different methodologies.
Choosing the Best Lifecycle for the Kitchen Heaven Project
To determine the most appropriate life cycle for the Kitchen Heaven Project, it is necessary to understand the essence of the initiative with a real example. In general, the study of management based on an actual project can come closer to solving essential problems in practice (Yilmaz et al., 2018). The project plans to open a retail store within a specific time frame with particular requirements, such as accommodation in a wealthy city area. In addition, the project requires stakeholder participation and coordination with marketers.
Based on this information, the most appropriate cycle is iterative, as it allows quick adaptation to changing requirements. In addition, this approach provides flexibility and coordination with the marketing team for opening. The iterative cycle also responds to the dynamic nature of retail, which is customer-oriented. Nevertheless, it is essential to have a precise analysis of consumer requirements to assess risks and opportunities for choosing a suitable life cycle.
Conclusion
In conclusion, choosing a life cycle for the Kitchen Heaven Project is a complex task that a project manager must manage. However, the iterative cycle has good potential for successful project implementation. This method takes into account feedback and is flexible, allowing it to adapt to the needs of the consumer and manager throughout the project implementation process. Therefore, the project could be started and completed promptly, which was the ideal option for the project under consideration. At the same time, the project’s limitations and needs must be carefully analyzed to make the most appropriate life cycle decision.
References
Burmistrov, A., Siniavina, M., & Iliashenko, O. (2018). Project Management Life Cycle Models to improve management in high-rise construction. E3S Web of Conferences, 33, 03005. Web.
Dalcher, D. (2020). Moving beyond project delivery: reflecting on the life cycle concept as a way for organizing project work. PM World Journal, 2, pp. 94–104. Web.
Yilmaz, M., Tasel, F. S., Gulec, U., & Sopaoglu, U. (2018). Towards a process management life-cycle model for graduation projects in computer engineering. PloS One, 13(11), e0208012. Web.