Review of “Guns and Cars Are Different” by MacLeod

The writing “Guns and Cars Are Different” was originally composed by Jacob MacLeod who is a student at Wright State University. In fact, the text provides a reaction to a New York Times writing by the author Nicholas Kristof, which is “Our Blind Spot about Guns” (Bullock et al. 40). According to MacLeod, While Kristof is factual that reasonable gun restriction is a worthy proposition in general, the statistics suggests that some of the specific measures he recommends should not be implemented (Bullock et al. 40). Enhancing background checks will be a fair approach to control weapons, according to MacLeod, and failing to do so would result in more weapons in the hands of (Bullock et al. 40).

In general, the text says that lower speed restrictions and trigger locks cannot be considered as appropriate forms of regulation, although background checks are. As per MacLeod, the issue with this idea is that, while it is founded on common sense, practical evidence suggests that it might not function properly (Bullock et al. 41). The initial text is written in a form of an essay with clearly separated introduction, thesis statement, main body, and conclusion parts. Furthermore, the author utilizes statistical data from the sources that are listed as references to justify his argumentation. In terms of the reaction, it is feasible to state that the writing is argumentative and, due to the presence of sources, can influence the overall perception of the described issue.

To summarize, to support his position, the author relies on statistical data from the sites given as references. Regarding reader’s reaction, it is reasonable to conclude that the writing is argumentative and, due to the inclusion of sources, has the potential to impact the overall impression of the discussed problem. Concerning implications of the text, further research on the topic of gun control regulations can offer variants of dealing with different related issues.

Work Cited

Bullock, Richard, Goggin, Maureen Daly, and Francine Weinberg. The Norton Field Guide to Writing: with Readings and Handbook. W. W. Norton & Company, 2019.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2023, June 14). Review of “Guns and Cars Are Different” by MacLeod. https://studycorgi.com/review-of-guns-and-cars-are-different-by-macleod/

Work Cited

"Review of “Guns and Cars Are Different” by MacLeod." StudyCorgi, 14 June 2023, studycorgi.com/review-of-guns-and-cars-are-different-by-macleod/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2023) 'Review of “Guns and Cars Are Different” by MacLeod'. 14 June.

1. StudyCorgi. "Review of “Guns and Cars Are Different” by MacLeod." June 14, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/review-of-guns-and-cars-are-different-by-macleod/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Review of “Guns and Cars Are Different” by MacLeod." June 14, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/review-of-guns-and-cars-are-different-by-macleod/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2023. "Review of “Guns and Cars Are Different” by MacLeod." June 14, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/review-of-guns-and-cars-are-different-by-macleod/.

This paper, “Review of “Guns and Cars Are Different” by MacLeod”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.