Background
Right-to-work (RTW) laws refer to the state legislation in the United States that forbids several union-security measures where workers are likely to join during employment. Right-to-work laws entail support from most employers, particularly small businesses and other anti-union individuals. Members supporting the laws argue that the progression grants employees the right to work without joining unions’ pressures. Additionally, they suggest that the laws enhance the workers’ ability to bargain on an individual basis. On the other hand, the opponents to right-to-work laws view the laws as misleading due to their inability to guarantee employment to the citizens. This group maintains that the laws reduce the employee’s job security due to the weakened union’s bargaining power. The unions are critical instruments in the workers’ achievement of better working conditions and high wages. They also contribute to the establishment of economic stability in the nation. This paper focuses on the proposal to abolish right-to-work laws because they have harmed unions.
Reasons for the Abolishment of Right-to-work Laws
The RTW Laws Solves a Nonexistent Issue
With the RTW laws, the federal government enhances the protection of the employees’ free will in joining the union and due payment. Workers can choose to opt out of the union membership under a unionized organization or pay reduced dues catering to wage negotiations, benefits, and employee reorientation when solving workplace issues (Denice & Rosenfeld, 2018). This advancement gives more workers a free ride as they gain from the union’s collective bargaining even without contributing. For instance, the ant-union workers will utilize the situation to their advantage by opting out of payment but still have a legal right to union representation. These individuals enjoy complimentary services at the member’s and the union’s expense. The free-rider issue challenges the union activities and can contribute to its collapse. Workers expect the union to handle their problems without ensuring support to the operations due to the legal protection they enjoy (Hogler, 2017). In the advancement, the process becomes harmful to the union that does not benefit from the services it renders to numerous free riders.
Additionally, the situation depicts a high inequality level that the union has been fighting for years in the working environment. The labor unions operate in the workers’ best interest, which is evident in how they present grievances bridging the gender and ethnicity gaps in society. Additionally, the unions ensured that women get equal pay as the male counterparts working in the same position and performing similar duties (Denice & Rosenfeld, 2018). The weakening of union power entails implementing the RTW laws as significant guidance in the working environment. The laws also inhibit the workers that wish to enhance solidarity by joining from getting enough power to voice their grievances. This inhibition prevents the members from negotiating for better wages and improved working conditions.
The RTW laws harm the union progression, as it is very challenging for it to work without funds. Based on the national operations, there is not a single institution in the US that can function without dues. All organizations require funding to offer services to its members. The workers also operate under the same conditions as the state chambers requiring them to participate fully in the due payment for better services. The members’ payments are the primary sources for the union’s functioning (Denice & Rosenfeld, 2018). In the advancement, it would be unfair to the faithful members in due payment if the union serves non-members, such as representing them at workplaces when having issues with employers yet do not pay any funds. Several states have adopted the RTW laws, and research reports indicate the employees’ inclination to low wages in the progression. In such conditions, the union power diminishes, and it is hard for unions to enhance solidarity among the workers. This situation indicates how the RTW laws harm the union enhancing unfairness.
The Decline in Union Funding
Right-to-work laws are harmful to the union as they affect its funding source. The regulations prohibit employers and labor unions from necessitating the employee’s payment of union dues as an employment condition. This situation implicates that the employers can choose to either be part of a union or not (Bueno, 2017a). Additionally, the law progression allows the employers to opt for the due payment to the unions. This condition harms the unions financially as each worker’s due adds to several dollars per year. Apart from the union members’ dues, the leaders also stand a better payment chance. The unions utilize the funds under various functions that contribute to the development and aid the workers in attaining better working conditions. It is vital to note that some fund utilization methods such as union maintenance and new contract negotiations. They also use the funds to propose bills, build up strike funds, and enhance pending legislation campaigns. The unions also spend their money by supporting political campaigns.
The United States historical advancement depicts unions as strong actors in the political campaign donations. The unions play a significant role in the government’s political development and participate in leaders’ endorsement at the national and local levels (Coslovsky et al., 2017). They disseminate their political views at national events through the union’s founding. Apart from funding the political activities, the union also guides the workers in choosing the right leaders inclined to help employees receive better employment terms. The RTW laws weaken this power and the influential capacity as some workers and employers decided to implement the RTW laws requirements. Implementation of right-to-work laws affects all these functions in the union, making it lose influence among the workers.
The RTW law proponents argue that unions and employers’ inhibition from collecting dues from the employees aims to protect workers and support them in establishing economic stability and growth. Additionally, they indicate that unionized organizations are likely to turn away potential employees due to dues payments to the unions (Bueno, 2017a). They also suggest that requiring the employees to join the unions and remit funds infringes their right to economic freedom (Coslovsky et al., 2017). The dues are essential, and the progression enhances financial stability in all socioeconomic levels through bargaining for better wages. The anti-union groups limit the union powers to enhance less support for the democratic parties in the political arena. The law utilization successfully brings down the unions’ activities by contributing to the financial constraints they experience. The elimination of RTW laws is essential for the union’s growth and ability to generate funds to support political moves with the worker’s best interest at heart.
RTW Contributes to Decline in Solidarity
The unions help the workers in bargaining for higher wages. In the progression, if an employee who is a union member undergoes persecution entailing low wages, the union fights for the grievances and ensures the workers get their dues. Even the same sector employees who do not pay their dues receive higher wages and the encompassing benefits (Makridis, 2019). Additionally, as the workers enjoy salary increment, the union also benefits from more elevated privileges. The RTW laws, on the contrary, allow for individual bargaining, and an employee who feels underpaid can set an agreement with the employer for higher dues. In the process, some workers could earn higher than others while working in the same position. This situation implicates that the adoption of RTW laws limits the union operation, and the lack of collective power contributes to low wages across all sectors. Collective bargaining is significant in the working environment due to several advantages it carries for the workers (Makridis, 2019). It allows for an agreement between the group of workers and the employee about the best working conditions for both parties, employee rights, compensation, benefits, and salary increment. These agreements determine the participation levels in the organizational affairs, training provisions, working hours, safety, and the wage scale. The introduction of RTW laws jeopardizes the collective bargaining power allowing each worker to fight for their rights.
The union gains ability to champion workers’ grievances when they work as a team in goal attainment. When the union registers divisions emanating from the RTW laws, it is hard to fight for substantive results due to a lack of enough support (Unser et al., 2020). Only a few members cannot advocate for salary increment and success. The union decline results in the employers ensuring low wages due to lack of a collective bargaining ability. The union also receives low rates while others workers fail to remit their dues, and the division affects the union’s functioning.
The RTW laws grant the federal government the right to burn all the strikes in the nation. This activity hurts the union’s abilities, which involve peaceful protesting in the presentation of the grievance. The unions were so powerful before the emergence of RTW laws and could mobilize the members who experienced unfair treatment through the striking process (Unser et al., 2020). It is difficult for the unions to mobilize workers under a meaningful agreement for solidarity through a protest with the current progression as only a few workers are inclined to the union. The loss of power that the union had for years serves as a significant blow to its function in the working environment. The workers who valued the union’s bargaining aspect now fight for individual rights as the states implement the RTW laws.
The RTW Laws Decline the Union Power by Silencing the Worker’s Voice
By weakening the employee’s ability to join unions and work in solidarity with colleagues, the RTW laws reduce the organization’s voter turnout and the union’s capability in power generation. This situation weakens the workers union’s ability to enhance government policies to support better working conditions and remuneration for all employees, including non-members. Workers under a union are more likely to participate in charitable activities, be politically active, and have a high likelihood to vote. More vital unions entail community members’ support irrespective of the wealth status (VanHeuvelen, 2020). The unions also have a robust nature that allows them to champion the workers’ economic interests. Additionally, the unions have positively contributed to the legislative landmarks including, the voting rights Act and ACA. The unions argue that if the nation wishes to establish democracy, they focus on strengthening the country’s labor movements. The RTW laws weaken the union bonds and democratic activities, affecting its positive progression.
The United States anti-worker groups work towards enhancing policies that diminish the union’s power through employees’ solidarity. The groups advocate implementing RTW laws as the employees’ top priority right, claiming to protect workers legally (VanHeuvelen, 2020). America’s cooperate groups that champion the workers’ laws aim to benefit from the union’s downfall in several ways. For instance, at the union’s decline, the corporations are free will to cut the employee wages, including the accrued benefits, rather than sharing with them. Also, the fewer union members result in a weakened political force responsible for backing other developing economic policies. These beneficial aspects of the corporations depict a decline in the union’s power to advance worker’s needs.
The RTW laws that aim to weaken the union powers adversely affect middle-class Americans. The unions are the topmost groups that advocate for the middle-class workers’ rights and grievances (Bueno, 2017b). The progression of the union’s success implicates the middle-class Americans’ achievement. If the union records declined rates, it indicates that the middle-class workers receive flogged wages, whether members or non-members (Kane & Newman, 2019). Unions are vital instruments in the community as they constitute full intergenerational economic mobility. For instance, in the research progression, the CAP report suggests that union membership is associated with higher future wages and benefits for the members’ children. Additionally, the children who grow up in lower-income communities that value union solidarity have higher economic mobility than those that originate from low-union association areas (Hsieh et al., 2017). This advancement implicates that the middle-class workers’ financial stability depends on the union support that fosters their growth. The unions are influential groups in the employment sector, enhancing solidarity and economic stability where it is weakening results in the middle-class’ disability to generate a successful future. The numerous middle-class workers in America contribute to the unions’ prosperity, and their solidarity decline implicates low benefits.
The RTW Laws Contributes to Power Shift towards Corporations
The RTW laws aim at shifting the power in the employment sector to corporate influence. The progression diminishes the union’s ability to harness the workers’ support and enhance economic and political policies. These laws promote individual bargaining ability that increases the capacity for low wages (Hsieh et al., 2017). The unions argue that this situation depicts the corporations’ aim to accumulate wealth among the rich while the poor languish in poverty due to lower wages. The unions advocated for equity in wealth acquisition by fighting for an increase in minimum wages allowing the low-earners to improve their living standards. As the corporations gain influence, unions have to devise other financial measures to sustain their functions. Additionally, achievement of the economic stability entailed the union’s success in planning collective bargaining that attracted membership (Kane & Newman, 2019). It was easier for associations to disseminate information concerning the best political leaders and charitable opportunities under this progression. As the corporations gain power and influence, they become dominant in decision-making regarding wage determination while eliminating the employees’ bargaining power ability.
The RTW Laws cause Economic Harm
The resulting economy from the RTW laws harms not only the employees but also the unions. The contemporary progression depicts around 28 states that have adopted the right-to-work laws. A report from the economic policy institution (EPI) indicates that workers in unionized states receive higher wages than those that implemented the RTW laws. (Arslan‐Ayaydin et al., 2021). As the advocates for the workers’ law suggested that the new laws would contribute to employment creation, studies indicate that they do not affect job growth. The unions attest to the advancements as anti-union actions that aimed at gaining more power. Another EPI report regarding Oklahoma’s impact after implementing RTW laws depicts an insignificant employment effect. The state indicated massive relocations due to the decline in the manufacturing firms after de-unionization. This situation implicates loss of jobs as the firms declined.
The study reports depict that RTW laws do not enhance economic value by impacting the employment sector through job creation and wage raising. The unions argue that due to the negative implication of the RTW laws in the job market, it is essential to eliminate the laws and work with policies that contribute to economic stability across all socioeconomic spectrums (Arslan‐Ayaydin et al., 2021). Although the statutes fail, congress still upholds them due to their ability to assert corporate power over the workers. The provision also diminishes the worker impact in wage increment and democratic progression in the absence of union influence. The RTW laws should be abolished due to their failure to contribute to economic stability and instead harm the abilities that contribute to stabilization.
In conclusion, the RTW laws harm the union and require abolishment for productive operation in the nation. The law affects the unions’ funding ability by protecting workers who opt out of the unions and fail to pay their dues. Employees join the progression of a free rider where they require the union’s services, including wage bargaining and benefit utilization. The laws solve non-existent problems by creating an unfair situation for the members who pay dues and the union itself. Their operation involves workers’ division jeopardizing the bargaining power ability. The laws also contribute to the unions’ diminishing power by declining the workers’ voice. This situation presents the union with the inability to influence the workers in the voting progression that improves the working conditions as power shifts to corporations. Based on the various reasons for the RTW laws’ abolishment, they indicate the critical functions that the unions performed. By declining the union influence, the RTW laws enhance low wages among the workers, which replicates economic progression. A stable nation ensures equal resource distribution, as the unions strived to achieve. The unions’ federal government requirements to operate under insufficient resources seem unrealistic as even the government chambers can also not function without fund sources. The workers’ unions must have a primary source of income to function well. The RTW laws ensure more harm than good to the union, which qualifies them for abolishment. The laws affect the union and the entire working environment, including employment terms and financial capabilities. By abolishing the RTW laws, the union will gain power and contribute to the workers’ ability to seek higher wages and collective bargaining in other unfair proceedings. The advancement is essential in establishing the national economy as individuals stabilize.
References
Arslan‐Ayaydin, Ö., Thewissen, J., & Torsin, W. (2021). Disclosure tone management and labor unions. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 48(1-2), 102-147.
Bueno, N. (2017a). Corporate liability for violations of the human right to just conditions of work in extraterritorial operations. The International Journal of Human Rights, 21(5), 565-588.
Bueno, N. (2017b). From the right to work to freedom from work: introduction to the human economy. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 33(4).
Coslovsky, S., Pires, R., & Bignami, R. (2017). Resilience and renewal: The enforcement of labor laws in Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society, 59(2), 77-102.
Denice, P., & Rosenfeld, J. (2018). Unions and Nonunion Pay in the United States, 1977-2015. Sociological Science, 5, 541-561.
Hogler, R. L. (2017). Saying goodbye to unions in higher education: Labor policy under the trump administration. Academic Labor: Research and Artistry, 1(1), 49-58.
Hsieh, H. Y. S., Jung, B., & Han, Y. (2017). The impact of non-financial stakeholders on accounting conservatism: The case of labor unions. Seoul Journal of Business, 23.
Kane, J. V., & Newman, B. J. (2019). Organized labor as the new undeserving rich: Mass media, class-based anti-union rhetoric and public support for unions in the United States. British Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 997-1026.
Makridis, C. A. (2019). Do right-to-work laws work? evidence on individuals’ well-being and economic sentiment. The Journal of Law and Economics, 62(4), 713-745.
Unser, A., Zviadadze, S., Döhnert, S., Shupac, M., & Ziebertz, H. G. (2020). Predictors of attitudes towards the right to work: An empirical analysis among young people in Moldova and Georgia. In International Empirical Studies on Religion and Socioeconomic Human Rights (pp. 129-168). Springer, Cham.
VanHeuvelen, T. (2020). The right to work, power resources, and economic inequality. American Journal of Sociology, 125(5), 1255-1302.