Scientific Ethics in Tuskegee Syphilis Study

Infection with syphilis in most cases occurs sexually, is transmitted from person to person. Untreated or poorly treated syphilis in the vast majority of cases, despite individual deviations, consistently passes in its development through certain negative periods. I believe that it should be mandatory to inform the physician about the presence of symptoms of such diseases. In this way, the physician will be able to pre-inform patients who are not sufficiently versed in the topic about precautions and treatment options.

The well-being and health of not only the patient and his family, but also other people sometimes depend on how the specialist manages the information received during counseling and diagnosis. Indeed, there is a threat of spread to people with whom the infected person comes into contact. However, this spread is also inherent in other diseases. Establishing and maintaining a relationship of trust between physician and patient is important, and confidentiality is critical. Medical ethics should not allow disclosure of such information, as this may lead to consequences in the format of the desire of infected patients to hide information from medical personnel.

The Tuskegee experiment shows that there are significant reasons for the current distrust of health care on the part of certain cultural groups in the US. The researchers, in their pursuit of results, have taken a lengthy, unethical, and unprofessional approach (Barrett, 2019). The use of people as test subjects without their consent cannot be justified by any result. Regulations should limit such interference by the scientific community in the lives of citizens. Conducting experiments on humans should be carried out on a volunteer basis and in compliance with safety rules. The deaths of people in the Tuskegee experiment were largely a consequence of the deliberate inaction of doctors.

Reference

Barrett, L. A. (2019). Tuskegee syphilis study of 1932-1973 and the rise of bioethics as shown through government documents and actions. Documents to The People, 47, 11. Web.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2022, December 19). Scientific Ethics in Tuskegee Syphilis Study. https://studycorgi.com/scientific-ethics-in-tuskegee-syphilis-study/

Work Cited

"Scientific Ethics in Tuskegee Syphilis Study." StudyCorgi, 19 Dec. 2022, studycorgi.com/scientific-ethics-in-tuskegee-syphilis-study/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2022) 'Scientific Ethics in Tuskegee Syphilis Study'. 19 December.

1. StudyCorgi. "Scientific Ethics in Tuskegee Syphilis Study." December 19, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/scientific-ethics-in-tuskegee-syphilis-study/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Scientific Ethics in Tuskegee Syphilis Study." December 19, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/scientific-ethics-in-tuskegee-syphilis-study/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2022. "Scientific Ethics in Tuskegee Syphilis Study." December 19, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/scientific-ethics-in-tuskegee-syphilis-study/.

This paper, “Scientific Ethics in Tuskegee Syphilis Study”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.