Introduction
The attainment of sustainable development goals is essential to justifying significant growth across Australia. Sustainability is a multidimensional phenomenon encapsulating the apt exploitation of available resources and ensuring the proficient distribution of benefits amongst all stakeholders. Different perspectives contribute to socioeconomic advancement within a region. As an Australian indigenous group, the Aboriginals encounter profound challenges within the civilization spectrum due to the marginalization essence (Altman, 2018). On the one hand, the Aboriginals optimally uphold traditional beliefs and customs. On the other hand, Australian society seeks adept alteration of systems and structures through such initiatives as urbanization and modern medicine. The core strategic initiative promoting an alliance between organizations and the Australian indigenous community encompasses implementing sustainable development goals.
The Australian Aboriginal Indigenous Community
The Aboriginal Sydney is the native community in Australia that faces significant challenges due to the drastic human evolution, mainly urbanization and legal framework. The aboriginal Sydney and Torres Strait Islander people continuously thrive under dynamic social factors such as healthcare, social growth, development, and cultural practices (Yap & Watene, 2019). One of the major factors that the native Australian communities utilize for survival and resilience is the essence of observing the individual health status. The marginalization of the Aboriginals in Australia is an issue that threatens the well-being of the group (Altman, 2018). In this case, the two communities observe a healthy lifestyle despite living in inaccessible remote regions.
Aboriginal diversity groups in Australia face imminent issues based on socioeconomic status due to the identical factor. Over the decades, the indigenous and non-indigenous rivaled for the key distinguishing features. On the one hand, a significant percentage of the Australian population identifies members of the Aboriginal diversity group from their appearance. On the other hand, it is easier to notice an Australian Aboriginal member by skin color on account of a significant percentage of the population encompassing brown or black based on the country’s location (Altman, 2018). However, the physical identification process poses a profound issue due to the neglect of the mixed race. Ideally, the expansion of the human population and movement fostered the increase in intermarriages. As a result, the number of people of mixed race, mainly between Whites and Aboriginals, increased. In this case, the best alternative to identifying members of the Aboriginal group entails cultural familiarity. A culture is a basic form of identifying the aboriginal diversity set and the solution to the underlying conflict between the indigenous and non-indigenous diversity groups.
Due to the prejudiced identification process, the Australian government faces a profound issue of balancing the benefits between indigenous and non-indigenous communities. In the early 1800s, the Aboriginals were referred to as the Australians, and the group was significantly diverse (Altman, 2018). Nevertheless, in the 1900s, the terminologies changed to the aboriginals to distinguish the non-indigenous from the indigenous groups (Altman, 2018). Although the Whites defined the Aboriginals and the Australians based on their racial composition, the Aboriginals identified each other based on their cultural practices. Fundamentally, the majority of the Aboriginal diversity group members argue that although they are indigenous community members, their ancestors emerged of non-indigenous descent, mainly mixed-race (Mio et al., 2020). However, the individuals associated with the indigenous group regard the nature of kinship. Aboriginal identity is geared by the inheritance and transition of knowledge about cultural practices and belief systems.
The social organization of the Aboriginal diversity groups is dynamic, especially based on the urban and rural entities. Fundamentally, the urban aboriginal communities mainly adapt to the urbanized behavioral practice significantly influenced by capitalism. However, it is different in rural areas. Rural Aboriginals face challenges such as accessing affordable health services and facilities anent to the distance and availability of finances (Borek et al., 2019). The factors contributing to the core issue encompass the social and organizational elements of using traditional medicine for healing properties and the distance to the health facilities. Rural aboriginal communities highly treasure ancestral lands. Therefore, in the case that the occupants of lands are located in the most remote Australian regions, the individuals resolve to use the conventional treatment methods. In this case, the nature of challenges among the Aboriginal communities varies based on the urban and regional remoteness to access the basic amenities.
Case Study Examples
Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders lack an effective legal framework that enhances the communities’ participation in the country’s development agenda. Schokman and Russell (2017) postulate that one of the organizations that advocate for indigenous groups’ self-determination include Oxfam Australia. Oxfam Australia is a company that promotes marginalized communities’ participation in the development agenda of national and global institutions. The researchers further argue that Oxfam Australia’s report indicates the key solution to eradicating poverty among the Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders is increasing their participation in decision-making (Schokman & Russell, 2017). An excellent example is the implementation of healthcare initiatives to boost the indigenous groups’ well-being. The increased participation of Aboriginals in decision-making about development contributes to an efficient trickle-down effect of benefits through self-determination.
The marginal difference in the socioeconomic status between the indigenous and non-indigenous groups is a factor that prompted the government to initiate an apology to the former group. The Australian prime minister offered an apology in 2008 to initiate the recognition and appreciation of the country’s socio-cultural heritage (Altman, 2018). Apart from acceptance of the Aboriginal communities and the cultural practices, the national administration established policies that focused on reducing the gap between the indigenous and non-indigenous groups. Therefore, the historical organization of the Aboriginal communities is founded upon the core issues of the margin difference with the non-indigenous.
The cultural practices of the aboriginal communities mainly involve communal and conventional engagements contrary to the modern influence of capitalism. Commercialism in Australia spearheaded economic growth and the evolution of human society (Borek et al., 2019). One of the aspects is the acquisition of knowledge and skills through the learning system. While the non-indigenous group focused on acquiring education, the Aboriginal communities focused on learning about the traditions as a form of identity (Sheppard et al., 2021). As a result, capitalism became the mediator in enhancing the gap between the indigenous and non-indigenous groups. In this case, the conflict underlying between the indigenous and the non-indigenous communities was geared by the influence of mercantilism in the construct of modern society.
The government aims to intensify the accrual benefits among the Aboriginal communities to empower them as Australians. In 2008, during the apology, the prime minister discussed the various measures fostered to empower the Aboriginal communities (Parnell et al., 2017). One of the measures was increasing the accessibility of education among the Aboriginals. In this case, the Aboriginals were offered grants to facilitate their learning. The acquisition of knowledge and skills is an opportunity for the Aboriginals to participate in the country’s economic growth and development (Parnell et al., 2017). The second measure encompassed increasing employment opportunities among the Aboriginals. The intensification of occupational prospects for the Aboriginals involved offering subsidy options to the companies hiring Aboriginals to encourage the private sector to commission more Aboriginals. As a result, this entity expanded the Aboriginals’ contingency to secure job openings and improve their livelihood. Another measure that the prime minister addressed was the issue of accessing health facilities and amenities. Therefore, the prime minister showed commitment to increasing medical care accessibility by increasing the number of health centers around rural Australia.
It is the responsibility of the Australian government to establish initiatives that boost interdependence across diverse communities. Different ethnic groups uphold other practices and belief systems (Hobbs, 2018). As a result, it is crucial to indicate the critical initiatives on diversity management strategies. An excellent example entails the foundation that demands the inclusivity of Aboriginals in development agendas due to the relative customs of creation. According to the Aboriginals, all worldly entities are created from their ancestors or manifest their personalities (Gauss, 2020). Therefore, it is crucial to appreciate the sustainable use of natural resources as a formative aspect to respect the ancestral platform. In this case, Aboriginals’ involvement in the growth and development action planning fosters a prominent trickle-down effect of the accrued benefits under socio-cultural and economic endeavors.
Different tales from the Aboriginals foster disparate meanings and understanding concerning society and the importance of peaceful coexistence. According to one of the tales by Aboriginals, there was a big frog named Tiddalick (Gauss, 2020). The animal woke up very thirsty one early morning and drank all the water from the sources. The phenomenon fostered the lack of water for other animals. Therefore, other animals decided to make Tiddalick laugh to spit out the water in the belly. After several trials with different animals, only the snake managed to make him chuckle, an aspect that rendered the spit out of the water. Campaign for the rights of indigenous groups in Australia is an effort to boost inclusivity towards dynamic civilization practices (Bennet & Gates, 2019). Research establishes that one of the vital challenges among the Aboriginals is the adequate acquisition of knowledge concerning distinct entities (Baker et al., 2021). An excellent example is the integration of perceptive domains appreciating cultural practices among dynamic communities. The Aboriginals uphold Australia’s pillar of sociological structure mainly as a result of relevant historical origin.
In a different spectrum, the disparity in the illiteracy levels between the indigenous and non-indigenous groups contributes to the adept necessity of enhancing growth and development. On the one hand, non-indigenous adhere to the constitutional requirements advocating for dynamic practices (Bennett & Gates, 2019). An excellent example is the privatization of land and other amenities. On the other hand, Aboriginals follow the communal ideological framework that justifies the apt foundation of traditional morals and virtues. Implementing programs enhancing the participation of all communities renders an advancement to the tourism activities due to the coordination to render competent tourism experience across the region.
Australia’s socioeconomic and cultural structure is a multifaceted dimension that fosters coordination and diversity among the dynamic stakeholders. Dedekorkut-Howes, Torabi, and Howes (2021) argue that sustainability boosts the quality of production across Australia based on distinctive economic pillars. The Sustainable Development Goals is a multifaceted ideology of governance that entails the core values of human health and environmental protection. The principles of Sustainable Development Goals enshrine human health, the protection of nature, and the enhancement of the resources’ productive benefits. In this case, waste management becomes one of the development initiatives in international governance. The practice is a dominant factor in growth since it shields settlements from poor sanitation and the spread of diseases. Urbanization rendered the migration of individuals to city centers seeking employment opportunities. As a result, the urban areas became congested and vulnerable to pollution from intense human activities. Therefore, the effective implementation of the action plan promotes public health and environmental protection from the evolutionary trend. Debris control is a vital factor that defines the principles of natural resource exploitation through the spectrum of sustainable growth and development.
Apart from government involvement in the promotion of sustainable development goals, various organizations implemented initiatives on corporate social responsibility. Plant et al. (2019) indicate that one of the core strategies among Australian firms on Aboriginals’ participation in product development enshrines the apt commodification of cultural elements. An excellent illustration is the focus on marketing and selling significant elements representing Aboriginal communities’ customs and norms as souvenirs. Transcendentally, the scholars establish that the solution encapsulates determining the business positioning and effective placement of the indigenous groups within the production to enhance efficacy. The planning and implementation of a program prioritizing empowerment among stakeholders is a composite of sustainable development goals.
Sustainable Developmental Initiative in Australia
Different controversial factors influence the relationship among all Australian communities. The domains enshrine tourism, healthcare, and Aboriginal traditional culture and practices. Although the region features dynamic foundational engagements among the citizens, it is the government’s responsibility to incorporate strategies that boost inclusivity (Baker et al., 2021). Sustainability management is a multidimensional phenomenon that enshrines the integration of ethical praxis to boost the distribution of accrued benefits. Researchers establish that morality is an essential framework within an organization since it attributes to the work culture (Baker et al., 2021). However, a major challenge in deciphering virtuosity is determining objectivity and relativity. The efficiency scale of distinctive structures, socio-cultural pillars, tourism activities, and healthcare services depends on optimal stakeholders’ participation.
Organizations utilize variant policy frameworks influencing competence levels. In this case, Sachs et al. (2021) argue that the key advantage of sustainable development goals enshrines standardizing the strategic initiatives. One of the insights attributing to the foundational sustainable development goals involves enhancing all stakeholder participation in the implementation process. Ideally, it is crucial to indicate the variable entities on accrued benefits and the trickle-down effect. Therefore, Sachs et al. (2021) focus on reporting the necessity of achieving the core objective. The main goal of advancing the relationship between firms and Australian indigenous groups is to promote productive corporate social responsibilities. Transcendentally, the strategic incorporation of programs on Aboriginals’ cultural identity plays a proficient role in the diversification of certain elements as enrichment of tourism experiential and satisfactory quotients. Therefore, it is recommended that companies optimally engage the Aboriginal communities in corporate development to affirm the core aspect of social justice and inclusivity.
Conclusion
Conclusively, sustainable development goals are a steering framework for coordination between organizations and Australian aboriginal groups. The core foundational outlier that involves growth enshrines engaging the Aboriginals to elevate the trickle-down effect of accrued benefits on the economic development quotient. It is recommended Australian government remodels the policy mainframe focusing on the distinct entity of stakeholders’ participation in project planning and implementation. The actualization of the initiatives boosts the sustenance and harmonization of social equity within the Australian region.
References
Altman, J. (2018). Beyond closing the gap: Valuing diversity in Indigenous Australia. Canberra, ACT: Centre for aboriginal economic policy research (CAEPR), The Australian National University.
Baker, K., Adams, J., & Steel, A. (2021). Experiences, perceptions and expectations of health services amongst marginalized populations in urban Australia: A meta‐ethnographic review of the literature. Health Expectations.
Bennett, B., & Gates, T. G. (2019). Teaching cultural humility for social workers serving LGBTQI Aboriginal communities in Australia. Social Work Education, 38(5), 604-617.
Borek, J., Groelke, B., Earnhardt, C., & Vermillion, C. (2019). Economic optimal control for minimizing fuel consumption of heavy-duty trucks in a highway environment. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 28(5), 1652-1664.
Dedekorkut-Howes, A., Torabi, E., & Howes, M. (2021). Planning for a different kind of sea change: lessons from Australia for sea level rise and coastal flooding. Climate Policy, 21(2), 152-170.
Gauss, A. V. (2020). Villains of Formosan Aboriginal Mythology. Intergrams, 20(1), 1-29.
Goldenberg, T., Reisner, S. L., Harper, G. W., Gamarel, K. E., & Stephenson, R. (2020). State policies and healthcare use among transgender people in the US. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 59(2), pp.247-259.
Hobbs, H. (2018). Constitutional recognition and reform: developing an inclusive Australian citizenship through treaty. Australian Journal of Political Science, 53(2), 176-194.
Hunt, J., & Smith, D. (2018). Strengthening indigenous community governance: a step towards advancing reconciliation in Australia. Web.
Mio, C., Panfilo, S., & Blundo, B. (2020). Sustainable development goals and the strategic role of business: A systematic literature review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3220-3245.
Parnell, D., Morris, S., & Jacobs, R. (2017). Engaging aboriginal and Torres strait islander peoples in the ‘Proper Way’. Web.
Plant, A., Hammadi, A., Taylor, R., Reiners, T., & Wood, L. (2019). A classification of deception in operations and supply chain management: A case study of deception in Australian souvenir markets. In 26th EurOMA conference.
Sachs, J., Kroll, C., Lafortune, G., Fuller, G., & Woelm, F. (2021). Sustainable development report 2021. Cambridge University Press.
Schokman, B., & Russell, L. (2017). Moving beyond recognition: Respecting the rights of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. and acknowledgements.
Sheppard, L. K., Rynne, S. B., & Willis, J. M. (2021). Sport as a cultural offset in Aboriginal Australia?. Annals of Leisure Research, 24(1), 29-50.
Yap, M. L. M., & Watene, K. (2019). The sustainable development goals (SDGs) and indigenous peoples: another missed opportunity?. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 20(4), 451-467.