Data Content
A Supply Chain Management System (SCMS) stores crucial data related to all supply chain partners, including suppliers, manufacturers, logistics providers, and customers. This data encompasses product details, orders, and shipments (Akbar & Darius, 2019). By tracking this information, which also covers inventory levels, production schedules, and transportation routes (Fu et al., 2022), organizations gain the ability to monitor their entire supply chain and make well-informed decisions aimed at improvement. This data is key to optimizing operations, such as reducing inventory and finding more efficient transportation paths.
In addition, the SCMS has data analytics capabilities that enable planners to examine trends and patterns in the data, making better decisions about how to run the supply chain. Some SCMSs track data on the financial side of the business, including information on invoices, payments, and credit terms. SCMS data typically includes information on supplier performance, customer satisfaction, and product quality (Gardner et al., 2019). This data can be used to assess the overall efficiency and effectiveness of the supply chain.
Hardware and Software
The hardware architecture of an SCMS can vary depending on the organization’s size and needs. However, most plans will include a server, client interface, database, and network (Foerstl, Meinlschmidt, and Busse, 2018). The client uses the client interface to interact with the system. It provides a graphical user interface (GUI) that enables the client to input data and view the results (Khosroshahi, Rasti-Barzoki, and Hejazi, 2019).
The server is responsible for storing and processing the data in various applications. It receives data from the client, processes it, and then stores it in the database (Genovese et al., 2017). The network is used to connect the client to the server. It can be a Local Area Network (LAN) or a Wide Area Network (WAN).
The software components of a supply chain management system can include applications for managing suppliers, manufacturers, logistics providers, and customers. These applications can include inventory management, used to track the movement of goods through the supply chain (Dubey et al., 2017). The software components of an SCMS enable organizations to automate their supply chain and increase its efficiency (Korpela, Hallikas, and Dahlberg, 2017).
Another app is order management, which allows for the tracking of customer orders and the monitoring of their progress through the supply chain. Transportation management software is applied to plan and execute the transportation of goods through the supply chain (Paliwal, Chandra, and Sharma, 2020). Warehouse management involves close monitoring of material storage and supplier management, enabling businesses to effectively oversee their relationships with suppliers and track their performance.
Organizational Process Support
The primary organizational processes that an SCMS supports are planning, sourcing, manufacturing, delivery, and returns. It helps organizations plan their production and delivery activities by providing information on inventory levels, supplier performance, and customer demand (Rebs, Brandenburg, and Seuring, 2019). This information paves the way for more informed decisions about timing and the method of production and delivery of goods and services. Organizations source the materials and components they need to create goods and services through the SCMS (Panigrahi, Bahinipati, and Jain, 2019). It provides information on supplier performance, prices, and availability.
Furthermore, firms can utilize SCMSs to manage the production of goods and services. It provides information on production schedules, equipment utilization, and quality control. This information enables organizations to make more informed decisions about producing goods and services (Saberi et al., 2018). Another essential activity is delivering goods and services to its customers. It accomplishes this by providing information on delivery schedules, routes, and customer preferences (Koberg & Longoni, 2019). Hence, companies need to better understand when and how to deliver goods and services to their target markets. Lastly, the SCMS assists organizations in managing the return of goods and services.
Benefits
Increased Efficiency
The SCMS enhances an organization’s efficiency by automating various processes and tasks, freeing up staff time to focus on more critical studies. The system can automate order processing, invoicing, and shipping (Dehgani & Jafari Navimipour, 2019). This can help reduce the time staff need to spend on these tasks and also decrease the likelihood of errors (de Camargo Fiorini & Jabbour, 2017). Activities and communication occur fast along supply chains using the SCMS, ensuring no gaps in cooperation, which could lead to delays and poor customer satisfaction.
Increased Customer Satisfaction
In practice, SCMSs have enabled companies to better forecast demand, plan production, and track inventory levels, ensuring that the organization can meet customers’ needs in a timely and efficient manner. This has resulted in shorter lead times, fewer stockouts, and fewer backorders (Castillo et al., 2018). All of these factors have contributed to increased customer satisfaction. Additionally, the system can help to monitor customer feedback and address any issues that may arise (Bai & Sarkis, 2020). This, in turn, has led to even higher levels of customer satisfaction, resulting in increased revenues, as depicted in the graph below. The yearly returns increase each year with the application of the SCMS.
Increased Accuracy
SCMSs help ensure accuracy in companies by streamlining the ordering, receiving, and shipping processes. By integrating with other systems, such as accounting and inventory management, it can provide real-time visibility into the location and expected arrival time of products (Srinivasan, Kumar, and Narayanan, 2020). This enables companies to make more informed decisions about production and inventory levels, thereby avoiding stockouts and production delays (Fernandes et al., 2017). In addition, SCMSs can help automate and track shipments’ progress, allowing companies to more easily resolve any issues that arise.
Challenges
High Costs of Implementation
Implementing the SCMS can often lead to increased costs throughout the supply chain, especially for low-performing companies, as illustrated in the graph below. The systems can be complex and require specialized software and hardware. Additionally, training staff to use these methods can also be costly. Acquisition of the system is expensive, and so is its maintenance (Zekhnini et al., 2020). A team of specialized workers must be employed to manage the system, ensuring its safety and proper performance, which incurs additional costs for the company (Xu et al., 2017). However, the prices of widely developed companies are lower and, therefore, more advantageous.
Organizations need to invest in new software and hardware to have an effective system in place and train their staff on how to use the new system (Yang et al., 2018). This can be a significant investment for many organizations. However, it may take some time for the benefits of the system to be realized. Furthermore, the system requires periodic updates and improvements, which can cause severe disruptions to business (Astill et al., 2019). A company could incur unnecessary costs if the system fails to update promptly, as many operations would come to a halt.
Lack of Standardization
One of the critical potential problems of SCMSs is the lack of standardization. This can lead to confusion and errors, making it difficult to compare data and performance across different supply chains (Zheng & Zhang, 2020). One of the reasons why standardization is so important is that it enables the comparison of data and performance across different supply chains.
This can make identifying problems and improvements complex (Akbar & Darius, 2019). Standardization is also crucial because it facilitates the sharing of information across various parts of the supply chain (Ansari & Kant, 2017). Lacking standards, attempts to share data become challenging, resulting in significant inefficiencies and potential disruptions.
Lack of Transparency
A lack of transparency in the supply chain can make it challenging to track goods and materials, leading to inefficiencies and potential disruptions. A transparent supply chain is one in which all parties have visibility into the entire process, from supplier to customer (Zhu et al., 2018). This visibility enables all parties to track progress, identify bottlenecks, and make necessary adjustments to keep the supply chain running smoothly (Marota et al., 2017). However, many supply chains are not transparent, resulting in several adverse effects, including siloed systems that fail to share information, manual processes prone to error, and a lack of uniformity throughout the supply chain.
This lack of transparency can lead to inefficiencies and disruptions, as tracking goods and materials and identifying and solving problems becomes more challenging (Zhong et al., 2017). There are some ways to improve transparency in the supply chain. One approach is to invest in technology that provides visibility into the entire process. Another is standardizing processes and data across the supply chain so that all parties work with the same information.
Reference List
Akbar, M. and Darius, A. (2019) ‘E-supply chain management value concept for the palm oil industry, Jurnal Sistem Informasi, 15(2), pp. 15–29. Web.
Ansari, Z. N., and Kant, R. (2017) ‘Exploring the framework development status for sustainability in supply chain management: a systematic literature synthesis and future research directions, Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(7), pp. 873–892. Web.
Astill, J. et al. (2019) ‘Transparency in food supply chains: a review of enabling technology solutions‘, Trends in Food Science & Technology, 91, pp. 240–247. Web.
Bai, C. and Sarkis, J. (2020) ‘A supply chain transparency and sustainability technology appraisal model for blockchain technology‘, International Journal of Production Research, 58(7), pp. 2142–2162. Web.
Best Supply Chain Management Solutions & Vendors 2022: TA (2022) TechnologyAdvice. Web.
BitCanna (2018) Supply chain management software on the rise catalyzing blockchain to leverage potential, Medium. Web.
Castillo, V. E. et al. (2018) ‘Supply Chain Integrity: A key to sustainable supply chain management‘, Journal of Business Logistics, 39(1), pp. 38–56. Web.
de Camargo Fiorini, P. and Jabbour, C. J. (2017) ‘Information systems and sustainable supply chain management towards a more sustainable society: Where we are and where we are going‘, International Journal of Information Management, 37(4), pp. 241–249. Web.
Dehgani, R. and Jafari Navimipour, N. (2019) ‘The impact of Information Technology and communication systems on the agility of Supply Chain Management Systems‘, Kybernetes, 48(10), pp. 2217–2236. Web.
Dubey, R. et al. (2017) ‘Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Framework and further research directions‘, Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, pp. 1119–1130. Web.
Fernandes, A.C. et al. (2017) ‘Supply Chain Management and Quality Management Integration‘, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 34(1), pp. 53–67. Web.
Foerstl, K., Meinlschmidt, J. and Busse, C. (2018) ‘It’s a match! choosing information processing mechanisms to address sustainability-related uncertainty in sustainable supply management‘, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 24(3), pp. 204–217. Web.
Fu, Q. et al. (2022) ‘Sustainable supply chain and business performance: the impact of strategy, network design, information systems, and organizational structure‘, Sustainability, 14(3), p. 1080. Web.
Gardner, T. A. et al. (2019) ‘Transparency and sustainability in global commodity supply chains‘, World Development, 121, pp. 163–177. Web.
Genovese, A. et al. (2017) ‘Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: Evidence and some applications‘, Omega, 66, pp. 344–357. Web.
Jen A. Miller and Thomas Wailgum (2017) The top 5 Supply Chain Management Vendors, CIO. Web.
Khosroshahi, H., Rasti-Barzoki, M. and Hejazi, S.R. (2019) ‘A game theoretic approach for pricing decisions considering CSR and a new consumer satisfaction index using transparency-dependent demand in sustainable supply chains‘, Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, pp. 1065–1080. Web.
Koberg, E. and Longoni, A. (2019) ‘A systematic review of sustainable supply chain management in global supply chains‘, Journal of Cleaner Production, 207, pp. 1084–1098. Web.
Korpela, K., Hallikas, J. and Dahlberg, T. (2017) ‘Digital supply chain transformation toward Blockchain Integration‘, Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2017) [Preprint]. Available at: Web.
Marota, R., et al., (2017). ‘Material flow cost accounting approach for sustainable supply chain management system’, International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 6(2), pp.33-37. Web.
Paliwal, V., Chandra, S. and Sharma, S. (2020) ‘Blockchain technology for Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A systematic literature review and a classification framework‘, Sustainability, 12(18), p. 7638. Web.
Panigrahi, S. S., Bahinipati, B. and Jain, V. (2019) ‘Sustainable supply chain management‘, Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 30(5), pp. 1001–1049. Web.
Rebs, T., Brandenburg, M. and Seuring, S. (2019) ‘System dynamics modeling for Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A literature review and systems thinking approach‘, Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, pp. 1265–1280. Web.
Saberi, S. et al. (2018) ‘Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management‘, International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), pp. 2117–2135. Web.
Srinivasan, R., Kumar, M., and Narayanan, S. (2020) ‘Human resource management in an industry 4.0 ERA‘, The Oxford Handbook of Supply Chain Management, pp. 10–29. Web.
Supply chain management costs per $1,000 in revenue. Supply and demand chain executive. (2020). Web.
Xu, L. et al. (2017) ‘COC: secure supply chain management system based on a public ledger‘, 2017 26th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN) [Preprint]. Web.
Yang, Z. et al. (2018) ‘Synergy between green supply chain management and green information systems on corporate sustainability: an informal alignment perspective‘, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22(2), pp. 1165–1186. Web.
Zekhnini, K. et al. (2020) ‘Supply chain management 4.0: a literature review and research framework‘, Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28(2), pp. 465–501. Web.
Zheng, X. and Zhang, L. (2020) ‘Risk assessment of supply-chain systems: a probabilistic inference method‘, Enterprise Information Systems, 14(6), pp. 858–877. Web.
Zhong, R., Xu, X. and Wang, L. (2017) ‘Food supply chain management: systems, implementations, and future research‘, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(9), pp. 2085–2114. Web.
Zhu, S. et al. (2018) ‘How supply chain analytics enables operational supply chain transparency‘, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 48(1), pp. 47–68. Web.