The Cross-Generational Discrimination

Harmful biases may present themselves in forms that not many people recognize. Ageism is one such discrimination that is widely accepted among many companies, with over 78% of older and many younger workers being subjected to it (Hasserot, 2021). I observed this phenomenon myself, as I have been deemed inexperienced in a situation where I had the necessary skills, yet my age made people consider me less worthy. Nowadays, younger people are thought to be lacking the potential for long-term commitments and have everything given to them by others. This perception leads to younger adults being hired at a lower rate and creates systemic oppression.

Older adults can be subjected to similar situations where their physical fitness would be disregarded merely because of their age. Frailty is not a myth, yet it does not prohibit people from participating in society. These generations can also be expected to have issues with memory. While such a deterioration does occur in some cases, it is detrimental for people to consider every older person as prone to Alzheimer’s (Levy, 2018). Systemic oppression in the form of forcing retirement upon older adults is a common practice.

Cross-generational conflicts are more common than people perceive them. Interpersonal discrimination often stems from one’s view on older or younger people being not fit for a task, as it is acceptable to call them “geezer” or “kid” (Hasserot, 2021). People who are experiencing ageism can promote the positive qualities that make them superior to younger or older workers, despite the usual stereotypes. For example, an older person can remain physically fit, or a young worker can increase their self-worth without relying on their parents. In conclusion, the adverse impact of cross-generational discrimination can be seen in the vast majority of modern societal structures, yet it is not a well-addressed phenomenon.

References

Haserot, P. W. (2021). How organizations can address ageism as part of their DEI strategy. Thomson Reuters Institute. Web.

Levy, S. R. (2018). Toward reducing ageism: PEACE (Positive education about aging and contact experiences) model. The Gerontologist, 58(2), 226–232. Web.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2023, April 24). The Cross-Generational Discrimination. https://studycorgi.com/the-cross-generational-discrimination/

Work Cited

"The Cross-Generational Discrimination." StudyCorgi, 24 Apr. 2023, studycorgi.com/the-cross-generational-discrimination/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2023) 'The Cross-Generational Discrimination'. 24 April.

1. StudyCorgi. "The Cross-Generational Discrimination." April 24, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/the-cross-generational-discrimination/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "The Cross-Generational Discrimination." April 24, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/the-cross-generational-discrimination/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2023. "The Cross-Generational Discrimination." April 24, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/the-cross-generational-discrimination/.

This paper, “The Cross-Generational Discrimination”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.