The Impact of Motivational Interviewing

Individuals prone to or suffering from substance abuse, smoking, eating disorders, gambling, etc., are less likely to have the motivation and desire to change. As a humanistic psychological practice, motivational interviewing has been treating addictions, disorders, and mental health issues. Motivational interviewing (MI) is an approach that “encourages people to say why and how they might change and pertains both to a style of relating to others and a set of skills to facilitate that process” (Frost et al., 2018, p. 2).

The four stages of motivational interviewing are engaging in a trustful working relationship, identifying the problem, helping the person find motivation for changing, and planning the change itself. At first, motivational interviewing was applied only to patients with alcohol addiction, but nowadays, it covers a wide variety of clinical problems, which is why the popularity of MI has significantly grown. It is quite challenging to identify which issues MI is most beneficial for, but there are plenty of reasons as to why this approach can be considered effective.

MI is person-centered and promotes responsibility, giving the patients both room to decide for themselves and ways to improve their motivation and mindfulness. The approach implies that “the counselor provides the conditions for growth and change by communicating attitudes of accurate empathy and unconditional positive regard” (Corey, 2017, p. 183). Therapists do not treat their clients as their opponents; on the contrary, they stress the importance of independence and make sure the conversation is always ambivalent. MI implies support, reflecting listening, empathy, and creating a safe and comfortable environment for the patient. In my estimation, MI is effective mainly because it is a gentle, respectful, and gradual process that allows people to use the resources they possess and establish their own goals and priorities.

References

Corey, G. (2017). Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 10th Edition. Cengage Learning.

Frost, H., Campbell, P., Maxwell, M., O’Carroll, R. E., Dombrowski, S. U., Williams, B., Cheyne H., Coles, E., Pollock, A. (2018). Effectiveness of motivational interviewing on adult behaviour change in health and social care settings: A systematic review of reviews. PLOS ONE, 13(10), 1-39. Web.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2022, July 26). The Impact of Motivational Interviewing. https://studycorgi.com/the-impact-of-motivational-interviewing/

Work Cited

"The Impact of Motivational Interviewing." StudyCorgi, 26 July 2022, studycorgi.com/the-impact-of-motivational-interviewing/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2022) 'The Impact of Motivational Interviewing'. 26 July.

1. StudyCorgi. "The Impact of Motivational Interviewing." July 26, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-impact-of-motivational-interviewing/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "The Impact of Motivational Interviewing." July 26, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-impact-of-motivational-interviewing/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2022. "The Impact of Motivational Interviewing." July 26, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-impact-of-motivational-interviewing/.

This paper, “The Impact of Motivational Interviewing”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.