Introduction
Business organizations should have proper mechanisms for preventing accidents and injuries. However, corporations might experience different occurrences even if such preventative measures are already in place. The involved parties should conduct proper accident investigations to prevent it from recurring. This essay explains why it is important for the relevant leaders and experts in companies to do a proper analysis of every incident.
Importance
Business organizations tend to experience various incidents that might affect their normal operations and goals. When such disasters strike, managers can complete timely investigations to achieve their aims. For instance, such measures will identify and determine the potential cause of the accident. This understanding will guide the relevant leaders to pinpoint inappropriate acts and conditions that might have led to the event (Ahmad et al. 5). The emerging views will guide the relevant individuals to implement the most appropriate mechanisms to prevent similar occurrences.
Pros of Doing an Investigation
Companies that take the concept of accident investigation seriously will record several advantages. First, such organizations will identify possible hazards that might have negative impacts on different workers or customers. Second, the strategy can guide leaders to identify the existing deficiencies and gaps in the established processes and operations. Third, proper investigations present evidence-based strategies for reducing injuries and meeting the demands of key stakeholders (Wang et al. 481). Fourth, this practice offers new incentives for introducing compensation practices, thereby increasing employee morale.
Cons of Not Doing an Investigation
Some organizational leaders might decide not to investigate accidents once they happen. This erroneous decision might have negative consequences on the company. The first one is that more employees and customers will have increased chances of getting injured when such incidents occur. The second one is that the company will lack a proper plan to mitigate similar accidents. The third disadvantage is that a culture of laxity might develop and eventually affect the overall performance of the organization (Morrish 637). The fourth one is that the approach will make it hard for the stakeholders to identify possible triggers of accidents and the most appropriate solutions. Consequently, the firm will be increasing its chances of becoming unsustainable or incapable of achieving its business aims.
Whether small or big, accidents provide timely insights for improving the nature of the workplace and meeting the demands of the greatest majority. The selected case of poor investigation is that of Tesco whereby Gavin Perrie sustained injuries following an unrepaired chiller handle (“Thompson Work Accident Case Studies”). The company instructed employees to open the door in an unacceptable way. The organization did very little to investigate and repair the handle. The company had to provide compensations to Perrie amounting to around £3,265 (“Thompson Work Accident Case Studies”). This case explains why companies should be prepared to conduct proper investigations.
Benefit to Companies
Proper investigations will always be beneficial to businesses. Such companies will apply the acquired knowledge to improve their workplaces continuously. More employees will operate in healthy environments and deliver positive business results. The company will minimize lawsuits revolving round negligence or injuries (Wang et al. 482). These aspects should compel the relevant professionals to conduct proper accident investigations and improve the established systems.
Conclusion
The above discussion has supported the power of proper accident investigations. Companies that embrace this idea will meet the demands of their workers, improve the safety of the working environment, and eventually achieve their business goals much faster. A culture of continuous improvement founded on the recorded outcomes will safeguard more individuals and reduce chances of liability.
Works Cited
Ahmad, Soltanzadeh, et al. “Analysis of Occupational Accidents Induced Human Injuries: A Case Study in Construction Industries and Sites.” Journal of Civil Engineering and Construction Technology, vol. 7, no. 1, 2016, pp. 1-7.
Morrish, Colin. “Incident Prevention Tools-Incident Investigations and Pre-Job Safety Analysis.” International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, vol. 27, no. 4, 2017, pp. 635-640.
“Thompson Work Accident Case Studies.” Thompson Solicitors Scotland, Web.
Wang, Jianhao, et al. “Investigation and Analysis of a Hazardous Chemical Accident in the Process Industry: Triggers, Roots, and Lessons Learned.” Processes, vol. 8, no. 4, 2020, pp. 477-494.