The short story by Richard Connell called “The Most Dangerous Game” quickly grabs a reader’s attention with its action-filled scenes. However, there are more mature topics within the story that highlight a question regarding the exceptional value of life and the error of black-and-white worldviews. This essay will analyze the underlying meaning of the story and the topics that the author placed into this hunt.
The differences in power are observable from the very beginning. The premise of the story revolves around the idea that Connell described as “The world is made up of two classes — the hunters and the huntees.” This notion will be revised throughout the story, as the main character gets involved in a horrific event himself, where he becomes the huntee. Connell stated the idea directly through Zaroff’s words: “Life is for the strong.” Mr. Rainsford met an opponent who has surpassed his achievements and had more resources at his disposal. However, he steeled himself and went on par with his opponent, proving that life’s worth can not be measured by one’s capabilities.
In conclusion, this story is not merely an action-packed short tale but a challenge of one’s values and worldviews. This dehumanization only angers the people who are considered less worthy while giving them the motivation to overcome adversity. As Connell shows in the last paragraphs of the hunt, this is “how an animal at bay feels.” In my option, this short story provides a crucial point of view on the power struggles between those who have the power and the will to live. It is essential not to treat others as equals, as hostility and violence will only make them dangerous.