Since the genesis of the US judicial system, the notion of the Supreme Court has always been one of the major bodies of justice and law implementation. Although the impartiality and promptness of the Supreme Court can barely be objected to, there is an ongoing debate on the correlation between public opinion and the decision-making process in Court. Thus, it concludes that US citizens are either unaware of their civil rights or experience ignorance of the judicial system, making the latter argument more reasonable considering the reality.
Thus, the following paper’s first point is the establishment of a correlation between the Supreme Court and the public as it is supposed to appear in terms of legal considerations. Another issue to be tackled is the extent to which this relationship should be exercised in the best-case scenario, claiming that this standard has been severely undermined. Finally, it should be mentioned the overall mention of public opinion is considered in extreme cases of public pressure on the hearing process.
The target audience that would consider the issue relevant is imitated neither to age nor to the social status. Since the very genesis of social structure across the state, active public participation in federal affairs has been predetermined by law. Thus, every active citizen of the US would be interested in defining how their relationship with the Supreme Court should have been legally built.
When speaking of the end goal of the following paper, it should be mentioned that raising people’s awareness is only a minor step on the way of establishing a proper relationship in the judicial-public paradigm. Thus, the primary aim of the discussion is to draw people’s attention to the aspect of their citizenship that is frequently ignored. In the best-case scenario, after acquaintance with the information, fellow residents will start to ask themselves what they could do to influence the current state of affairs.
One of the major primary sources for the discussion will be the statistical data recorded in terms of the “SCOTUSpoll” research held in association with Harvard University (“Supreme Court Public Opinion Project,” 2020). The following poll displays the public opinion on the matters currently relevant to the Supreme Court. To appeal to the already analyzed facts, the secondary study on the interrelation between these results and the Supreme Court’s decisions might be considered (Bryan, 2020).
Considering the sources introduced above, the major point outlined in the paper will concern the discrepancy present in the public opinion and the Supreme Court’s decision-making process. In fact, the discrepancy can be adequate when the decision itself is made impartially, but the following patterns of decision-making are extremely dependent on the leading party’s preferences and outlook. Another point of discussion concerns the overall interdependence of public outlook with the cases reviewed by the Supreme Court.
The evidence found in terms of the research work has revealed the actual opinion of the US public on relevant matters such as the LGBTQ+ community’s rights and justification of the police brutality. Hence, the aspect of public intervention in the process of decision-making will be contrasted by the opinion prevailing in the society. As a result, the publicity will become well-aware of the reality of social influence on the judicial work within the state.
References
ACLED. (2020). Demonstrations & political violence in America: new data for summer 2020. Web.
Bryan, A. C. (2020). Public opinion and setting the agenda on the US Supreme Court. American Politics Research, 48(3), 377-390.
Mazumder, S. (2018). The persistent effect of US civil rights protests on political attitudes. American Journal of Political Science, 62(4), 922-935.
Supreme Court Public Opinion Project. (2020). Web.