The Removal of Cash Equivalents

Under the current rules, the statement of cash flows features both cash and cash equivalents, short-term stable liquid investments that can easily be converted into cash. However, the FASB is currently considering eliminating the second category, working purely with money, and reclassifying noncash transactions as different categories on the statement. The change has not yet been settled on and is currently under deliberation by the organization, but the idea of such a change has existed for some time. The author disagrees with the change, as it aims to increase transparency in reporting but would only complicate it further instead.

The definition of cash equivalent is broad and somewhat imprecise, which can lead to misconceptions, both intentional and otherwise. As Novak et al. (2019) note, there have been incidents in the past where companies classified investments that were not necessarily suitable as cash equivalents and had to reissue their financial statements after the correction. With the new policy, such actions would no longer be possible, as each investment would have to be listed in its separate category. As a result, the company’s liquidity would not be misrepresented, enabling analysts to understand its situation as it is.

However, while there may be less deception, the statements would become substantially more convoluted. Per Klammer (2018), the change would also mean that noncash transactions would need to be reported in a separate financial statement note. As a result, it would take substantially more effort to parse the statements and comprehend the company’s financial state. As a result, the accessibility of this reporting to investors would become lower. Ultimately, some companies’ inappropriate actions should not serve as the cause to complicate the processes of all businesses and involved parties.

References

Klammer, Tom. 2018. Statement of Cash Flows: Preparation, Presentation, and Use. Hoboken: Wiley.

Novak, Lori, Valerie Warren, Donald E. Kieso, Jerry J. Weygandt, Paul D. Kimmel, and Barbara Trenholm. 2019. Accounting Principles. 8th ed. Hoboken: Wiley.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2022, January 29). The Removal of Cash Equivalents. https://studycorgi.com/the-removal-of-cash-equivalents/

Work Cited

"The Removal of Cash Equivalents." StudyCorgi, 29 Jan. 2022, studycorgi.com/the-removal-of-cash-equivalents/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2022) 'The Removal of Cash Equivalents'. 29 January.

1. StudyCorgi. "The Removal of Cash Equivalents." January 29, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-removal-of-cash-equivalents/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "The Removal of Cash Equivalents." January 29, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-removal-of-cash-equivalents/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2022. "The Removal of Cash Equivalents." January 29, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-removal-of-cash-equivalents/.

This paper, “The Removal of Cash Equivalents”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.