Tokyo Terrorist Attack in 1995: Stakeholders and Effects

Tokyo Attack is a Scandalous Terrorist Act in the History of Japan

In 1995, the capital of Japan was stirred by a dreadful terrorist attack that produced a damaging impact on the world community. According to the reports, the members of a scandalous religious group dropped the bags with sarin into the subway trains. The terroristic act inflicted 13 deaths. Moreover, more than 50 passengers were severely injured (Alfred, 2015). The shadowy cult, which was directed by Aum Shinrikyo, instantly fell into suspicion since the grouping was known for similar attacks. Due to the general suggestions, the act served as an indication of the government’s disapproval, for the scandalous leader, who claimed to be Christ, strived to overtake the central power in Japan.

We will write a
custom essay
specifically for you

for only $16.05 $11/page
308 certified writers online
Learn More

Stakeholder Analysis: Emphasizing the Effects of the Attack

Primary Stakeholders

The direct victims of the terroristic act fall into the category of initial stakeholders since they were harshly affected by the religious manipulations. The group includes not only those people, who were killed in the attack but their relatives as well as the citizens, who received some damage to their health in the aftermath of the event. Thus, it is acknowledged that approximately 6,000 Japanese people still suffer from the impact of nerve gas and are forced to require constant medical care support. Since human life is regarded as the highest value in all existing social systems, the primary group of stakeholders deserves for a high-quality treatment and medical expenditure recompenses. Moreover, the members of this sector should be provided with constant psychological support, for the attack became a moral burden for numerous victims and followed them through their lives.

Secondary Stakeholders

The category of secondary stakeholders includes two subgroups: the central government of Tokyo and the organization that was convicted of accomplishing a terroristic act. First, the authority of the city partly lost its credentials after the event since it was claimed that its leaders were supposed to establish strict control over the activities of this religious group, for it was not the first criminal act that was committed by it. Consequently, the society considered that the tragedy could have been precluded if the government had acted more decisively in the first place. Second, the act created an impact on the cult grouping. A significant part of its members got separated from the religious community, and it stopped its existence with an official death penalty of the leader of the Aum cult. Until today, some express skepticism about the guilt of religious grouping since they claim that it was impossible for the members of this community to produce a biological weapon (Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 2013). Therefore, it is often suggested that the act was shadowed governmental manipulation.

Key Stakeholders

The group of the key stakeholders includes the members of two previous categories. Besides, it refers to the world community as a whole. The matter of terroristic attacking is a substantial problem that targets multiple countries. Therefore, the global society is directly affected by the event since it provides personal implications for every state.

Summarizing the Consequences of Biological Weapons Usage

Any incident that takes place with the inclusion of biological weapons influences society and evokes mass panic, fear, and disintegration (DiGiovanni, 2002). Therefore, the group of primary stakeholders that can be identified in the Tokyo attack should receive psychological assistance. In their turn, the governmental leaders of the world are responsible for preventing similar events in the future.

References

Alfred, C. (2015). 20 years ago, a shadowy cult poisoned the Tokyo subway. The World Post. Web.

Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013). Web.

Get your
100% original paper
on any topic

done in as little as
3 hours
Learn More

DiGiovanni, C. (2002). Domestic terrorism with chemical or biological agents: Psychiatric aspects. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 156(10), 1500-15005.

Print Сite this

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2020, May 17). Tokyo Terrorist Attack in 1995: Stakeholders and Effects. Retrieved from https://studycorgi.com/tokyo-terrorist-attack-in-1995-stakeholders-and-effects/

Work Cited

"Tokyo Terrorist Attack in 1995: Stakeholders and Effects." StudyCorgi, 17 May 2020, studycorgi.com/tokyo-terrorist-attack-in-1995-stakeholders-and-effects/.

1. StudyCorgi. "Tokyo Terrorist Attack in 1995: Stakeholders and Effects." May 17, 2020. https://studycorgi.com/tokyo-terrorist-attack-in-1995-stakeholders-and-effects/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Tokyo Terrorist Attack in 1995: Stakeholders and Effects." May 17, 2020. https://studycorgi.com/tokyo-terrorist-attack-in-1995-stakeholders-and-effects/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2020. "Tokyo Terrorist Attack in 1995: Stakeholders and Effects." May 17, 2020. https://studycorgi.com/tokyo-terrorist-attack-in-1995-stakeholders-and-effects/.

References

StudyCorgi. (2020) 'Tokyo Terrorist Attack in 1995: Stakeholders and Effects'. 17 May.

This paper was written and submitted to our database by a student to assist your with your own studies. You are free to use it to write your own assignment, however you must reference it properly.

If you are the original creator of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal.