Underdevelopment of the Mentoring Theory

Apparently, there are several significant problems in the mentoring theory development. Bozeman and Feeney (2007) from the Department of Public Administration and Policy at the University of Georgia focus their article on identifying these persistent issues and critiquing this theory, as well as a number of existing findings that are not useful. The conceptual framework is used for this study; namely, the researchers analyze published sources, find a relationship between them, and suggest their own ideas that may contribute to the theory.

The authors decided to use two research methods for their paper, and Secondary Data Analysis is the first of them. To identify the problems in the theory and critique findings that lack necessary information, it is needed to analyze existing literature. Second, Bozeman and Feeney (2007) highlight the issues and voids with the help of a “thought experiment” that makes it possible to prove that the mentoring theory and research cannot solve particular persistent problems.

In a conclusion, the authors claim that the mentoring theory remains underdeveloped. In their judgment, the reason for that is “a failure to confront some of the lingering conceptual gaps in research and theory” (Bozeman & Feeney, 2007, p. 735). Therefore, further studying, as well as “demarcating mentoring from the sometimes confounding concepts of training or socialization,” are needed (Bozeman & Feeney, 2007, p. 719). Unfortunately, the existing literature is not enough to answer the questions and solve the problems in theory.

This article is a high-quality overview that builds on criticism and discussion of many studies. The paper is supported by sources, leaves no unresolved issues, and also brings new ideas and proposals to the mentoring theory. Since my research topic is about the lack of mentorship of African American women, this article is of great significance. It allows suggesting that an increase in the mentorship of African American women may be achieved by solving a more global problem: the underdevelopment of the mentoring theory. As soon as researchers continue enhancing it, it will be possible to address the issue of my research topic.

Reference

Bozeman, B., & Feeney, M. K. (2007). Toward a useful theory of mentoring: A conceptual analysis and critique. Administration & Society, 39(6), 719-739.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2022, August 4). Underdevelopment of the Mentoring Theory. https://studycorgi.com/underdevelopment-of-the-mentoring-theory/

Work Cited

"Underdevelopment of the Mentoring Theory." StudyCorgi, 4 Aug. 2022, studycorgi.com/underdevelopment-of-the-mentoring-theory/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2022) 'Underdevelopment of the Mentoring Theory'. 4 August.

1. StudyCorgi. "Underdevelopment of the Mentoring Theory." August 4, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/underdevelopment-of-the-mentoring-theory/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Underdevelopment of the Mentoring Theory." August 4, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/underdevelopment-of-the-mentoring-theory/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2022. "Underdevelopment of the Mentoring Theory." August 4, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/underdevelopment-of-the-mentoring-theory/.

This paper, “Underdevelopment of the Mentoring Theory”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.