Introduction
Reflective practice is one of the most critical components of communication assistance in nursing. Such practice can be performed within the framework of different models that help to reveal existing professional problems and experiences better. Workflows such as Gibbs, Johns, Kolb, or Borton’s models can significantly help in reflective practice, and with their help, it is possible to achieve maximum results (Smith, 2021). It will be correct to use the Gibbs model to analyze a difficult conversation in the past and identify the parties that need to be improved.
Application of the Reflective Model
The Gibbs reflective model is an effective practice that helps medical staff process their communication problems better. This technique is well-formed and requires specific steps such as description, feelings, evaluation, analysis, conclusion, and action plan (Sekarwinahyu et al., 2019). This way, practitioners and nurses can systematically review their experiences and reflect on past mistakes or situations that should have turned out differently.
This model should be used because it is practical and contains the necessary steps, the passage of which can significantly facilitate the task in reflection. With the help of structuring, this model is a convenient, universal tool for use in any situation. In this case, the Gibbs reflexive model will analyze a complex conversation between a nurse and a resuscitator. This approach is relevant because it will allow us to describe the situation and feelings experienced during communication (Harithuddin, 2021). In addition, this is done for further analysis and evaluation to draw up a plan that will help act in similar situations.
Gibbs Reflective Cycle will allow a general idea of what happened by placing and indicating the location of all key players. A further important step in applying the model is assessing the emotional state and the degree of stress experienced by the medical worker (Britt et al., 2021). This feelings stage will allow the nurse to concentrate on her emotions and understand their responses to the conversation. Further evaluation is crucial in understanding and internalizing the nurse’s strengths and what needs to be worked on more (Zhan et al., 2023). In this way, the medical professional can analyze the situation using critical thinking, which will help identify problems and their source. Further findings in the Gibbs scheme are needed to clarify areas for further improvement.
Description of Challenging Conversation
The defiant conversation occurred at the moment when the nurse initiated a medical emergency team call for a patient who was 3/52 weeks post-op. The patient had two abdominal drains on suction and IDC and was on intravenous therapy and patient-controlled analgesia. The patient was irritable, did not understand what was happening, experienced discomfort, and tried to get rid of attachments. During the conversation with the nurse, the resuscitator asked about the situation and the manipulations performed.
The resuscitator was dissatisfied with what the nurse had done and did not hide his irritation by telling the nurse that they did not understand how to help the patient and that the treatment plan should be followed. This public conversation, which took place in front of other colleagues and patients, made the nurse feel insecure and incompetent. At the same time, the discussion was not planned and prepared, which made the nurse feel uncomfortable. This could have been avoided by better preparation and review of the patient’s personal history before making the decision to move (Buheji & Buhaid, 2020). At the same time, the nurse did not try to object to anything without defending her position, thinking that nothing could be changed.
Analysis of Challenging Conversation
The conversation with the resuscitator of the intensive care unit was difficult and unpleasant, primarily because it was happening in front of other people. The situation made the nurse feel insecure about their competence and professionalism because they were publicly told what had been done wrong. The presence of other doctors, visitors, and patients hurt the situation, as it increased the feeling of embarrassment. However, despite this, after analyzing what the resuscitator said, it can be concluded that the criticism was constructive and was misperceived due to incorrect presentation.
Due to unexpected reprimands in front of colleagues and patients, pointing out errors could not be perceived as they should. This experience may help the nurse understand the importance of good preparation for challenging conversations involving bystanders (Carissa Fehr & Seibel, 2022). The lack of such practice left the nurse confused and unable to explain her position. In the future, when getting into similar situations, the nurse will be able to assess the needs of the patient better, keeping in mind past experiences. This, in turn, will improve the quality of care provided in the clinic.
Description of Learning and Formulation of Action Plan
The nurse gained invaluable knowledge from the discussion with the intensive care unit’s resuscitator, which allowed her to thoroughly evaluate the scenario and identify any mistakes committed. In this regard, the training outcomes used by the Gibbs Reflective Cycle can be attributed to the correct assessment of the importance of transferring patients (Tawanwongsri & Phenwan, 2019). It is also essential to learn from what happened that there are many factors to consider when deciding whether to call MET.
A more comprehensive assessment of the patient’s condition can help the nurse make a better transfer decision. Pay attention to details such as bedsores, medications, and treatment plans (Sepahvand et al., 2023). In addition, comprehensive work with all employees of the medical department will also be a positive lesson learned from the current situation. Establishing better communication could potentially prevent the previous nurse from missing out on detailed information about the patient’s condition.
Planning for future difficult conversations can be a helpful process to be ready to defend one’s position. This can help clarify the current situation so that doctors understand it more comprehensively (Shaw et al., 2019). Preparing and possibly scheduling future difficult conversations with colleagues and clients can help show a professional attitude and a high awareness of the patient’s condition. Facing difficult conversations can be inevitable in the nursing profession. Preparation for such situations in the future may include reviewing the patient’s medical history, treatment plan, and current medications. In addition, there should be preparation for specific possible questions that other doctors may have. This will make it easier for the nurse to answer them when they are not unexpected.
Conclusion
Careful preparation of nurses for interviews with doctors can positively impact the final results. However, in addition to this, it is also essential to pay attention to the patient’s condition since this is the primary duty of the nurse. Timely reading of all indicators can help determine the client’s state in order to make a further decision regarding their content. Thus, the unpleasant situation associated with a difficult conversation can be avoided. The absence of errors in a nurse’s activities indicates the qualifications necessary to achieve a better level of care.
References
Britt, T. W., Shuffler, M. L., Pegram, R. L., Xoxakos, P., Rosopa, P. J., Hirsh, E., & Jackson, W. (2021). Job demands and resources among healthcare professionals during virus pandemics: A review and examination of fluctuations in mental health strain during COVID‐19. Applied Psychology, 70(1), 120-149. Web.
Buheji, M., & Buhaid, N. (2020). Nursing human factor during COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Nurs Sci, 10(1), 12-24. Web.
Carissa Fehr, F., & Seibel, M. (2022). Nursing students and cognitive rehearsal training as an antibullying strategy: a Canadian national study. Journal of nursing education, 61(2), 80-87. Web.
Harithuddin, A. S. M. (2021). A first experience of using failure report as a reflective tool in engineering education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Online), 16(18), 23. Web.
Sekarwinahyu, M., Rustaman, N. Y., Widodo, A., & Riandi, R. (2019). Development of problem based learning for online tutorial program in plant development using Gibbs’ reflective cycle and e-portfolio to enhance reflective thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(2). IOP Publishing. Web.
Sepahvand, E., Daryabor, A., Hosseini, R. S., & Neyseh, F. (2023). Design and development of Kardex and nursing reports in the rehabilitation hospital. SAGE Open Nursing, 9. Web.
Shaw, A. C., McQuade, J. L., Reilley, M. J., Nixon, B., Baile, W. F., & Epner, D. E. (2019). Integrating storytelling into a communication skills teaching program for medical oncology fellows. Journal of Cancer Education, 34(6), 1198-1203. Web.
Smith, P. R. (2021). A study of the uses of a blog-based critical incident questionnaire in further education. University of Derby.
Tawanwongsri, W., & Phenwan, T. (2019). Reflective and feedback performances on Thai medical students’ patient history-taking skills. BMC medical education, 19, 1-8. Web.
Zhan, T. T., Wang, L. L., Wang, Y., & Sun, C. J. (2023). Master of nursing specialist experiences of an internship through the use of written reflections: A qualitative research study. Heliyon, 9(2). Web.