The argument raised from the lecture is that religious attitudes within the soul are adjustments and beliefs of things people cannot see. However, regardless of whether the unseen or the unrealities are things people believe to exist or objects of their consciousness, they elicit a reaction resulting from things thought due to sensible presence or even more substantial. Only in ideas are the different deities of various religions known. For example, for Christians, the believer’s prevalent attitude is linked to the realistic vision of the savior, and therefore, it is determined by divine personage beliefs (James, 2020). Religious objects are more concrete and fuller of abstract objects, yet all prove to have identical power, showing God as omnipresent, merciful, just, absolute, holy, and infinite.
However, from a philosophical perspective, human nature and the association with reality can be firmly attached to a belief object where life is polarized constantly. However, what is abstractly constituted in human minds is the magnetized and polarized cardinal facts, which people turn to, away from, hate, seek, hold, and bless as though they formed part of a concrete being (James, 2020). From another example, in human perception of the Greek gods, the attached conclusion is that religious conceptions can touch a feeling of reality in what seems to be almost unimaginable objects. When perceived from Buddhism and Catholicism philosophies, what constitutes belief are intuitions working together with reason and a great system ruling the world. The conclusion about religious and metaphysical spheres is they enable a platform where reason is articulated; they become cogent to people only when their inarticulate reality feelings are expressed to favor similar suppositions (James, 2020). Going by the philosophies in Buddhism and Catholicism, the belief objects are formulated translations.
Reference
James, W. (2021). The varieties of religious experience: A study in human nature. Scribere Semper et Legere.