Women’s Rights: Annotated Bibliography

A Vindication of the Rights of Woman

Author and Title of Source: Wollstonecraft, Mary. “A Vindication of the Rights of Woman.”

City of Publication: The publication of this primary source in the Norton Anthology of English Literature was located in the city of New York. However, the original work was first published in England.

Publisher and date of publication: The publisher of this primary source is W.W. Norton & Company. The tenth volume of the anthology was published in 2018; however, the original work was first published in 1792.

Relevance

The essay by Wollstonecraft is a primary source that informs the overall topic of the proposed essay since it provides the theoretically authentic basis for the discussion of the issues of women’s rights. The source provides explicit first-hand information on the women’s rights issues relevant to society at the end of the eighteenth century. In this regard, the source is directly related to the topic since it presents the author’s claims concerning the education necessary for women to obtain equal opportunities with men. Wollstonecraft devoted this deliberate piece of philosophical writing to claiming and vindicating women’s rights due to the dispute concerning the shortcomings of girls’ education for their life achievements. The reason for the relevance of this source to the selected topic of the research paper is related to the continuous importance of women’s rights issues in the contemporary world regardless of the centuries that have passed since Wollstonecraft’s publication.

Author’s and publishers’ credentials and reputation

The author’s credentials

The author of this primary source is a renowned English writer and philosopher, Mary Wollstonecraft, who was a prominent feminist who actively and successfully promoted women’s rights. These credentials qualify the author to be an expert on the subject of women’s rights due to her in-depth investigation of the problem and the logical and philosophical validation of the presented claims.

The publisher’s reputation

The publisher of this material is W.W. Norton & Company, which is a publishing entity with a long history. In particular, the tenth edition of Norton’s Anthology of English Literature is one of the many books published by W.W. Norton & Company; the organization is a reliable one since it specializes in printing credible and reliable materials.

Date of publication

The date of the publication of Wollstonecraft’s essay in Norton’s Anthology of English Literature is 2018, which is a recent publication date that validates the reliability of the source. However, the original publication of the essay is dated 1792; since then, it has been reprinted numerous times due to its significant historical value of this piece of writing. In this regard, one might claim that the source’s outdated publication does not hinder the quality and relevance of the information presented in it. Such a claim is validated by the researcher’s goal to deliver a historical perspective on the investigated issue and inspect how the concerns about women’s rights in 1792 have changed until now. Nonetheless, the publication date is an important issue to consider in feminist studies due to the necessity of placing the researched problems in the historical context for relevance.

Level of specialization and audience

This piece of literature was intended for a specific audience and not the general public when it was first published. In particular, it was a response addressed to the author of the publications that claimed to limit women’s liberation. In this regard, the initial intention of Wollstonecraft’s essay was to influence the decision-makers opinions on women’s rights in general and the importance of equal education for men and women in particular. Nonetheless, the expertise of the author and the validation of the arguments are easy to understand for the general audience due to the overall social context of the investigated problem that is relevant to wider audiences.

Availability

The material is available in print and in electronic formats, which makes it easily accessible in time for deadlines.

The rationale behind the choice of the source

The reason for choosing Wollstonecraft’s essay as a primary source for the research paper was validated by the strengths of the arguments presented in her writing and their persistent relevance to the contemporary situation with women’s rights. Moreover, the source provides a reliable and accurate historical context for the investigated problem. It is easily accessible, relevant to the topic, understandable for non-specialists, and was included in a recent academic anthology published by a reputable publisher. Thus, the source was deliberately selected on the basis of its relevance to a number of important factors.

Women’s Needs in New Global Sustainable Development Policy Agendas

Author and Title of Source: Nhamo, Godwell, et al. “Women’s Needs in New Global Sustainable Development Policy Agendas.”

City of Publication: The location of the publisher who prints the journal is New York.

Publisher and date of publication: The journal entitled Sustainable Development is published by Wiley & Sons Publishing; the article was published in 2018.

Relevance

As a secondary source, this academic journal article presents an in-depth piece of evidence about the contemporary issues experienced by women in an unequal society. The source is directly related to the topic of women’s rights and explores the connection between the addressing of women’s needs and the outcomes of gender inequality for sustainable development. Since sustainability and gender issues are interrelated, the source allows for setting the researched topic into a relevant contemporary context.

Author’s and publishers’ credentials and reputation

The author’s credentials

The authors are the scholars specializing in corporate citizenship and economics in South African universities. These credentials contribute to their level of expertise and make the source reliable and academically credible.

The publisher’s reputation

Sustainable Development is a reputable academic journal that is published by a reliable publisher, which makes the article a credible source of data on the researched topic.

Date of publication

The date of publication is 2018, which is only four years old as per the date of the research paper’s development. The recent publication date is pivotal in this regard since the source is used to illustrate the contemporary situation with women’s rights.

Level of specialization and audience

The material addressed in this journal article is of scholarly expertise and might be relevant for a narrow audience of academics or students researching feminist and sustainability issues. The academic vocabulary makes it a more advanced material. The evidence is presented in a scholarly manner, which contributes to the reliability of the data.

Availability

The source is easily accessible through online databases and in print through libraries.

The rationale behind the choice of the source

The choice of this source was validated by the contribution of the evidence contained in the study for the topic under investigation. The methodology and the approach to addressing women’s rights from the perspective of their contribution to sustainable development is a compelling aspect I the researched topic. It allows for widening the scope of the researched problem by validating its relevance and persistence.

A Critical Exploration of Women’s Gendered Experiences in Outdoor Leadership

Author and Title of Source: Rogers, Elizabeth Bond, and Jeff Rose. “A Critical Exploration of Women’s Gendered Experiences in Outdoor Leadership.”

City of Publication: The headquarters of the Sage Publication that prints the Journal of Experiential Education is Thousand Oaks, United States.

Publisher and date of publication: Sage Publications, 2019.

Relevance

The source directly addresses the adverse outcomes of gender inequality n the contemporary leadership sphere. The use of the method of narrative inquiry allowed the researchers to cultivate a realistic picture of leadership opportunities based on gender inequality. Moreover, the evidence provided by the scholars extends the scope of the topic by introducing the many manifestations of women’s rights concerns in the modern world.

Authors and publishers credentials and reputation

The author’s credentials

The authors of the article are scholars employed at the University of Utah; their credentials make them experts in the research field, which makes the source reliable.

The publisher’s reputation

Sage Publications is one of the largest academic publishing companies that have a long-term reputation of the one providing credible information.

Date of publication

Since the study was published in 2019, which is only three years prior to the present research paper, the date of publication is relatively recent, which validates the relevance of the study findings to the present situation. In this regard, the more recent the source, the more accurately the findings represent the state of affairs in the women’s rights field. Since policy-making is a fluid issue, the changes might occur quickly; thus, the recent publication date of this source signifies the relevance of the content to the context of the study.

Level of specialization and audience

Overall, the methodology used by the scholars is appealing to a wider audience of individuals within scholarly circles and those interested in the subject but without professional expertise. The source is of an academic level, the evidence, methods, discussion, and implications are relevant to the scholarly context.

Availability

This source is an electronic article that might be easily accessed through the website of the publisher or through academic databases.

The rationale behind the choice of the source

The researcher selected this article for the reason of the article’s precise attention to the problem of women’s underrepresentation in leadership positions. Given the context of the research topic, diminished access to leadership opportunities in both the results and the predecessor of gender inequality. The source is reputable, reliable, informative, and accessible, which has validated its selection as a literature piece for the research paper.

Does Increasing Women’s Education Reduce Their Risk of Intimate Partner Violence? Evidence from an Education Policy Reform

Author and Title of Source: Weitzman, Abigail. “Does Increasing Women’s Education Reduce Their Risk of Intimate Partner Violence? Evidence from an Education Policy Reform.”

City of Publication: The publisher printing the journal entitled Criminology is located in New York.

Publisher and date of publication: The publisher is Wiley & Sons; the publication date is 2018.

Relevance

The article is closely related to the topic of women’s rights and the role of education in eliminating inequality. Since the source provides evidence of women’s disproportionate exposure to intimate partner violence, it might be effectively applied to the research topic to illustrate how the lack of proper policies and education, in particular, threatens women’s safety in the long-term perspective.

The author’s and publisher’s credentials and reputation

The author’s credentials

The author of the study is a scholar at the University of Texas. The credentials of the academic contributions to the expertise in the field of study.

The publisher’s reputation

The publisher has a long renowned history; the journal is a reputable source of professional and scholarly data.

Date of publication

The journal article was published four years ago, in 2018, which makes the evidence relevant to the contemporary situation.

Level of specialization and audience

The academic level of specialization limits the target audience of the source to scholars and students investigating the issues of intimate partner violence. However, the discussion of the results and their implications are not too difficult for a non-specialist.

Availability

The source might be easily accessed in both electronic and print formats in time for deadlines.

The rationale behind the choice of the source

Since the article represents the field of criminology, the integration of such a source into the research paper allows for establishing intersectionality and interdisciplinary ties for more in-depth arguments. Indeed, the use of this source allows for extending feminist concerns beyond social or philosophical context and connecting them with real-life antecedents. Moreover, the accessibility, credibility, and accuracy of the source’s content validated its selection for the purposes of researching the topic.

Thesis Statement

Without the promotion of women’s rights to education, equal employment opportunity, and equal representation in leadership, states and communities will be unable to sustain long-term development.

Works Cited

Nhamo, Godwell, et al. “Women’s Needs in New Global Sustainable Development Policy Agendas.” Sustainable Development, vol. 26, no. 6, 2018, pp. 544-552.

Rogers, Elizabeth Bond, and Jeff Rose. “A Critical Exploration of Women’s Gendered Experiences in Outdoor Leadership.” Journal of Experiential Education, vol. 42, no. 1, 2019, pp. 37-50, Web.

Weitzman, Abigail. “Does Increasing Women’s Education Reduce Their Risk of Intimate Partner Violence? Evidence from an Education Policy Reform.” Criminology, vol. 56, no. 3, 2018, pp. 574-607.

Wollstonecraft, Mary. “A Vindication of the Rights of Woman.” The Norton Anthology of English Literature, edited by Greenblatt, Stephen. 10th ed., vol. 2, W.W. Norton & Company, 2018, pp. 98-123.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2023, March 29). Women’s Rights: Annotated Bibliography. https://studycorgi.com/womens-rights-annotated-bibliography/

Work Cited

"Women’s Rights: Annotated Bibliography." StudyCorgi, 29 Mar. 2023, studycorgi.com/womens-rights-annotated-bibliography/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2023) 'Women’s Rights: Annotated Bibliography'. 29 March.

1. StudyCorgi. "Women’s Rights: Annotated Bibliography." March 29, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/womens-rights-annotated-bibliography/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Women’s Rights: Annotated Bibliography." March 29, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/womens-rights-annotated-bibliography/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2023. "Women’s Rights: Annotated Bibliography." March 29, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/womens-rights-annotated-bibliography/.

This paper, “Women’s Rights: Annotated Bibliography”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.