Abortion With Limitations: Analysis

Introduction

Since abortion remains a divisive issue due to the presence of divergent opinions, permitting it with specific limitations is a good decision. Abortion needs to be illegalized unless a woman’s life is at risk, the pregnancy has resulted from rape, or criminal activities are involved.

Thesis Statement

With abortion resulting in the loss of life, strict guidelines and limitations are critical to meet the needs of women affected by poverty, health concerns, sexual abuse, or rape.

Strong Topic

Societies should not permit abortion since it is unethical. However, exceptions could be made when women are facing social problems, such as poverty. Women who are underage or have other children could be allowed to secure abortions (Berer 17).

Stronger Topic

Illegalizing abortion is recommendable unless the life of the women is at risk. The practice could be considered if the ultimate aim is to improve the health outcomes of more women (Mosley et al. 449).

Strongest Case

Cases of rape could be a strong reason for allowing abortion. In the event of sexual abuse, physicians and policymakers can consider the idea of an abortion (Blackshaw and Rodger 468).

Counterarguments

Irrespective of whatever argument or limitation proposed, abortion remains an unethical human practice. Some professionals could consider existing loopholes to support women to abort while ignoring the outlined limitations (Foster et al. 209).

So-What Factor

Stakeholders need to come together to address this dilemma from an informed perspective. A balanced view is necessary where about is permitted only if the outland criteria is met.

Conclusion

Abortion needs to be illegalized since it threatens human life and presents ethical concerns. Societies will permit it when the woman’s life is in danger or cases of abuse or rape are involved.

Works Cited

Berer, Marge. “Abortion Law and Policy around the World.” Health and Human Rights Journal, vol. 19, no. 1, 2017, pp. 13-27.

Blackshaw, Bruce, and Daniel Rodger. “If Fetuses are Persons, Abortion is a Public Health Crisis.” Bioethics, vol. 35, no. 5, 2021, pp. 465-472.

Foster, Diana G., et al. “Socioeconomic Outcomes of Women Who Receive and Women Who Are Denied Wanted Abortions in the United States.” American Journal of Public Health, vol. 108, no. 3, 2018, pp. 407-413.

Mosley, Elizabeth A., et al. “Attitudes toward Abortion, Social Welfare Programs, and Gender Roles in the U.S. and South Africa.” Critical Public Health, vol. 30, no. 4, 2018, pp. 441-456.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2023, November 14). Abortion With Limitations: Analysis. https://studycorgi.com/abortion-with-limitations-analysis/

Work Cited

"Abortion With Limitations: Analysis." StudyCorgi, 14 Nov. 2023, studycorgi.com/abortion-with-limitations-analysis/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2023) 'Abortion With Limitations: Analysis'. 14 November.

1. StudyCorgi. "Abortion With Limitations: Analysis." November 14, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/abortion-with-limitations-analysis/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Abortion With Limitations: Analysis." November 14, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/abortion-with-limitations-analysis/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2023. "Abortion With Limitations: Analysis." November 14, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/abortion-with-limitations-analysis/.

This paper, “Abortion With Limitations: Analysis”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.