It is essential to emphasize that the replication crisis refers to the argument that the results of many studies cannot be verified or reproduced, which leads scientists to assume that they are unreliable. I suppose that static bias is the reason for the biased attitude towards publications, which is causing the crisis. It is because the authors often change or exaggerate them to demonstrate the validity of the research. Another reason for the replication crisis is that the data analysis methods are not correctly selected, which influences the inconsistent outcome (Maxwell et al., 2015). Moreover, the vested interests of third parties funding research will also limit the degree of freedom of researchers, which distorts the results. I suggest reducing the risk of failure to replicate is achievable. It requires interpreting each replication individually rather than conducting a meta-analysis to produce a coherent interval (SciShow, 2016). Thus, it is crucial to change the wrong practice of interpreting data and improve data analysis techniques.
The Open Science framework is an essential tool to overcome the replication crisis. It is because when scientists can openly share data and codes that have been used in research and for information analysis, they can quickly verify them. In this way, in psychological research, other authors can conduct a parallel study with the same data and confirm or refute the claims of the first author. This is extremely beneficial, as it allows for identifying and discussing possible errors and ways to correct them (Maxwell et al., 2015). In addition, in psychological research, the publication of research findings will allow for many validation studies and alternative studies that will explore different aspects of the problem. As a result, it will present a holistic outcome to solve the issues of replication crisis and failure to replicate.
References
Maxwell, S. E., Lau, M. Y., & Howard, G. S. (2015). Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does “failure to replicate” really mean?. American Psychologist, 70(6), 487.
SciShow. (2016). Why an entire field of psychology is in trouble. [Video]. YouTube. Web.