The questions related to philosophical issues have been extensively discussed by people for many centuries. One of the core philosophical problems of the boundary between ethical and non-ethical actions and decisions. The topic of ethics is a complex one and has been approached from different angles by numerous philosophers. Yet, the most relevant perspective is the one which states that decisions cannot be categorically considered ethical or non-ethical.
Firstly, the world is a chaotic place, where sometimes there is no time to stop and reflect on life. People tend to be concerned mostly over their own lives and thus frequently do not take into consideration the feelings of others. However, such a behavior can be dangerous because people live in societies where they become dependent on one another. As a result, every action made by one person has immediate consequences for others. Thus, since one action can affect numerous people in various ways, their assessments of whether it is ethical or not may differ.
Secondly, every moral rule can be broken in an emergency. During wars, killing a person can become ethical and beneficial, euthanasia can release somebody from an unbearable life, and abortion can help some women avoid facing health problems. Additionally, the perspective also matters since, in a war for the soldier from an aggressor country, it is unethical to kill innocent people or soldiers who protect their country. Moreover, a person exposed to euthanasia could make a significant contribution and drastically change the world’s history. An abortion can kill a crucial person who could enjoy their life or change the world. Thus, every action or decision has a context that can ultimately change the perception of people of how ethical they are.
In conclusion, the question of which decisions are ethical is very subjective and uncertain. Essentially, since every situation is subject to many changes and factors, one decision can be viewed as ethical by some people and as non-ethical by others. Therefore, it is possible to state that there are no such decisions that can be unequivocally ethical or non-ethical because people tend to have different perspectives on the same events and actions.