Introduction
This study seeks to answer question relating to a pilot research study done in two health centers in Connecticut to determine the effect of dance and movement on the quality of life for 32 breast cancer survivors. It was undertaken in a period of 12 weeks.
Data Collection Method Used
Data was collected through questionnaires which were self administered to 32 respondents. Data was also obtained from two sample groups; the waiting list and the intervention groups. Statistical and expert techniques were also used to give a deeper insight into the observations (Sandel et al., 2005).
Data Collection Instruments
Data was collected through FACT B questionnaires. The body image scale was a secondary measure. This was used to support the outcomes of the other measures used. Shoulder ROM and the circumference of the arm were measured by an independent individual in the entire response group (Sandel et al., 2005).
Accuracy and reliability of Instruments used
The FACT-B type of questionnaire has been validated in various countries around the world with a primary use in cancer research. A number of countries have incorporated the use of the body image scale in their research studies on cancer victims and its use has been confirmed to be accurate and reliable. However, ROM and circumference of the arm outcomes are not that reliable because they are open to human error. Moreover, reproducibility trials were not done (Sandel et al., 2005).
Statistical or Analytical Methods Used
Variables of a binomial nature were measured using the chi-square tests. In addition, variables of a continuous nature were measured using the t-tests. U tests were used to analyze the data relating to the unevenly distributed time period for the breast cancer treatments. The arm circumference and the ROM were determined by the t-tests. These were used in pairs on the surgery. Linear models of a general nature were used to determine the credibility of the respondents’ replies. ANOVA measures were used repetitively to determine the effects relating to time as well as effects relating to the X groups. Reviewing of the data was done in an access data base that were incorporated it into an SPSS version (Sandel et al., 2005).
Statistical Values Reported
The FACT B measure improved from 102.0:15.8 to 116.7:16.9 in the intervention group. Compared to the thirteenth week, the waist group recorded statistical figures of 108.1:16.4 to 107.1: 21.3. The statistical figures regarding the impact of the program on the respondents’ health in the 26th week was significant. This recorded a time effect of P~.03; while the order of training signified P=.25. The shoulder ROM for both intervention and waist list groups also increased. The increase was from about -15oC to 8oC in the thirteenth week. This was quite significant considering the time frame. The body image scale also recorded significant improvement over the period of the program at the 13th and 26th weeks (Sandel et al., 2005).
Conclusion
The study to determine the quality of health was a qualitative research study because it showed a significant improved in the quality of life for the breast cancer victims. All the control measures including body image, FACT B questionnaires and the ROM measures showed an improvement in the quality of life. This therefore means that dance and movement can improve the quality of life for breast cancer survivors.
Reference
Sandel, S., Judge, J., Landry, N., Faria, L., Oullette, R., & Majczack, M. (2005). Dance and Movement Program Improves Quality-of-Life Measures in Breast Cancer Survivors. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.