Climate change is among the top threats facing the world in the 21st century and it deserves prioritization when planning how to move the country and the globe forward. Environmental shifts happen primarily due to advancing human activities. Therefore, there is a need to design holistic approaches to environmental protection. Legislation has been the most promising method of addressing ecological concerns. However, the enactment of appropriate directives is ineffective, considering the speed of ecosystem damage. Hence, it is critical to invest in improving environmental laws to boost the progress geared towards mitigating adverse climate modification.
The assigned readings reveal present-day ecological matters, particularly challenges undermining legislative management of environmental problems. The critical aspects identified in the articles include the necessity to personify nature for heightened legal safeguarding and boosting legislation’s resilience. Consequently, there is a push to treat nature as a living organism, assigning to it legal rights and designating the respective advocates (Pecharroman, 2018). In addition, it is vital to make environmental laws adaptable to respond to contemporary ecological transformations (Garmestani et al., 2019). Notably, it is essential to support the creation of nature’s rights and modification of the corresponding laws’ flexibility.
The world should emphasize the universality of environmental laws for improved ecosystem governance. The best mechanism is to regard ecosystems as living entities by giving nature legal personhood (Pecharroman, 2018). Such a move will pave the way for the development of policies that will apply internationally. Moreover, this reaction will help clarify who should assume the protection responsibility to streamline the existing enforcement difficulties. Apart from the lack of worldwide uniformity concerning ecological conservation, there has been insignificant trans-border advancement because of a few relevant agreements (Garmestani et al., 2019). Correspondingly, it is crucial to transfigure how the globe interprets nature to promote natural resources’ joint preservation.
Environmental laws must be pliable, given that the ecology continually deteriorates. Humans benefit the most from the environment, and they should appreciate the urge to support modern ecological laws that shield our planet from massive pollution arising from contemporary society’s actions (Pecharroman, 2018). The legislation is currently ineffective in saving the surroundings from anthropological effects due to the mismatch between policies and destruction levels. For instance, the existing laws are non-adaptive and cannot support functional environmental governance (Garmestani et al., 2019). Subsequently, it is pivotal to make the socio-ecological system self-regulating so that the guarding measures will match with the harm.
The climate predicament is spurring at a speed that people cannot cope with, and they must think elaborately on how to arrest the situation. The principal problem is the weak jurisdiction, and I am interested in partaking in innovative governance. The readings have provided me with insights into the best ways of contributing to creative legal modification. Notably, the identified main concepts and arguments affirm my future interest in sponsoring effective and resilient cosmopolitan ambient laws since I look forward to being an accomplished international environmental lawyer.
The world is staring at unprecedented issues that may become even worse than the ongoing pandemic situation due to the negligence in responding to climate change. The readings confirm that ecological catastrophes continue to subject humans to unbearable sufferings because of a lack of practical legislation continentally. Besides, the latest codes are rigid to contain the emerging ecological affairs, making them almost irrelevant. Consequently, the materials signify the prerequisite for law-making harmonization and legislation’s suppleness improvement for effectual environmental governance.
References
Garmestani, A., Ruhl, J. B., Chaffin, B. C., Craig, R. K., van Rijswick, H. F., Angeler, D. G., Folke, C., Lance Gunderson. L., Twidwell, D., & Allen, C.R. (2019). Untapped capacity for resilience in environmental law. PNAS, 116(40), 19899-19904.
Pecharroman, L. C. (2018). Rights of nature: Rivers that can stand in court. Resources, 7(1), 1-14.