Communism and liberalism are two distinct ideologies that have been traditionally framed as opposing approaches. Nevertheless, certain similarities can be identified that determine their impact on the global community. The main similarity between liberalism and communism is the emphasis on equality characteristics for both ideologies. However, the specificities of the said equality are different in each ideology. For example, liberalism ensures equality by postulating equal freedom from restrictions for all members of society. Through this freedom, liberalism creates a common ground for all individuals to interact and coexist. Communism, on the other hand, does not view equality in terms of freedom. Instead, its ideology is based on the concept of even distribution of power among the stakeholders. In other words, communism can be viewed as a doctrine that prioritizes the well-being of the society whereas liberal ideology places individual rights and freedoms in the center of attention. At this point, it is necessary to recognize the fact that minor differences exist between classical and modern liberal models.
specifically for you
for only $16.05 $11/page
The brightest example is the approach to social security. Classical liberalism postulates that governments are expected to control the economic development without interfering with individual freedoms whereas the modern approach also permits the possibility of controlling citizens’ subversion through means such as surveillance (Goodman, n.d.). This example illustrates the similarity between modern liberalism and socialism since both ideologies achieve the desired level of economic development and security through tight control over the population. This aspect of modern liberalism made it an especially popular option in a contemporary political environment. Thus, while it is commonly believed that liberalism provides opportunities for resolving problems of disadvantaged populations, it was also pointed out that on some occasions it was used to increase influence in previously unregulated areas. To sum up, communism is thought to impact the global community on a strategic scale whereas liberalism takes into account individual needs and interests at the expense of decreased control.
A diplomacy is a vital tool in facilitating peaceful collaboration between nations. From this viewpoint, the role of diplomacy is to establish reliable communication between global players in order to prevent conflict and maintain fruitful and sustainable collaboration. Since these goals can be achieved only when the stakeholders trust each other, the diplomat’s responsibilities include identifying vital needs and chief interests of nations and develop suggestions that would lead to mutual satisfaction with minimal disadvantages for all parties. These responsibilities can be fulfilled in a number of ways, including the development of dedicated events serving as platforms for information sharing, employing a third party to de-escalate conflict of interests, ruling out misunderstandings through summits and meetings, and drawing up treaties to formulate mutually agreeable terms.
However, the success of these approaches depends on a number of factors. For instance, readiness to seek mutually agreeable terms is vital in reaching a consensus. Thus, when at least one party views its interests as non-negotiable, it becomes more difficult to settle the argument, which means that in such scenario diplomacy may fail. A good example of such a stance is the ongoing Israel-Palestine conflict which shows resilience to diplomatic efforts. Some experts believe that the inability of Israeli peace groups to shift the public opinion towards altering the existing policies (Thrall, 2017). In other words, diplomacy can be considered a way of finding a solution that would provide benefits for both parties through minimal expenses, and the reluctance of at least one party to accept such terms will result in a failed diplomatic effort.
Goodman, J. C. (n.d.). Classical liberalism vs. modern liberalism and modern conservatism. Web.
Thrall, N. (2017). Israel-Palestine: The real reason there’s still no peace. The Guardian. Web.