Crisis Response to Active Shooter Situations

Active shooter events constitute a serious problem in the United States, particularly with regard to police response to incidents. According to Sikes et al. (2018), 70% of active shooter situations end in under 5 minutes, while “the national average response time of law enforcement is approximately 10 minutes” (p. 34). Therefore, it is essential to address the problem of active shooting crisis intervention and reduce police response time as a detrimental factor in the event outcomes and the number of casualties.

When establishing law enforcement policies and crisis intervention strategies, it is essential to follow evidence-based practice. This research explores the issue of law enforcement response time to active shooter events. The current problem is the difference between the average incident duration and the average time required for police officers to arrive on the site. The proposed policy solutions are to increase the employment of school resource officers (SROs), improve law enforcement communication, and include guidelines on building design and architectural features in first responder training. Kellom and Nubani (2018) report that preparing ahead of time and studying floor levels can reduce the police response time to active shooter events. Furthermore, Sikes et al. (2018) suggest that simulation training can effectively coordinate efforts, improve communication between departments, and prevent confusion, which can reduce response time.

Effective strategies are detrimental to the incident outcomes, which determines the significance of this study. The research will address the literature gaps concerning measured response time and standardized police response training. If successful, research implementation includes providing law enforcement with evidence-based data on reducing response time and the number of casualties. To conclude, this research is critical to address the problem and prepare for unpredictable active shooter events.

References

Kellom, K., & Nubani, L. (2018). One step ahead of active shooters: Are our university buildings ready?. Buildings, 8(12), 1-15. Web.

Sikes, D. L., Barnes, G. A., & Casida, D. L. (2018). Active shooter on campus!. Nursing made Incredibly Easy, 16(1), 34-41. Web.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2023, May 18). Crisis Response to Active Shooter Situations. https://studycorgi.com/crisis-response-to-active-shooter-situations/

Work Cited

"Crisis Response to Active Shooter Situations." StudyCorgi, 18 May 2023, studycorgi.com/crisis-response-to-active-shooter-situations/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2023) 'Crisis Response to Active Shooter Situations'. 18 May.

1. StudyCorgi. "Crisis Response to Active Shooter Situations." May 18, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/crisis-response-to-active-shooter-situations/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Crisis Response to Active Shooter Situations." May 18, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/crisis-response-to-active-shooter-situations/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2023. "Crisis Response to Active Shooter Situations." May 18, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/crisis-response-to-active-shooter-situations/.

This paper, “Crisis Response to Active Shooter Situations”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.