Introduction
Social work implies contacting individuals and employing a personalized approach to address the challenges and needs for assistance for each person. However, comparing different demographics and groups can facilitate the establishment of efficient techniques for combating issues and providing help. It is especially vital in the framework of social assistance as inefficient practices are to be identified and minimized. In turn, researching differences among groups can generate the establishment of measures that are more effective and ethical compared to others.
Discussion
For example, two groups of people consisting of individuals working with a single social worker can be divided. The first group is to be assisted with resources, both community and informational ones. Thus, the individuals will be directed toward outside sources of assistance and provided with the necessary information regarding accessing services. The second group is to directly work with the social worker who is to facilitate help directly without an extensive list of intermediate actors. Then, the participants within both groups are to complete a survey on their satisfaction with the assistance received by them based on their subjective opinions and personal experiences.
A comparison of the results obtained through the initiative will highlight which method is more well-received by individuals. In this case, the measurement is based on self-assessment, as the surveys will be distributed for participants to complete. The results can then be employed on an organizational level through the encouragement of fellow social workers to adapt the technique regarded as more efficient.
Conclusion
To conclude, a similar approach can be implemented when determining vulnerable populations requiring social workers to intervene, the success rate of intervention measures, and the proficiency of employees in assisting people with their requirements.