Discrimination in the Workplace: A Case Study

Case Elements of a Hostile Work Environment

It is evident that any employee of the company wants their workplace to be distinguished not only by its benefits and privileges but also by a friendly corporate culture in which it is pleasant to develop professionally. On the contrary, if verbal humiliation, insulting jokes, and disrespect are regularly directed towards the staff, then even with the guarantee of keeping the position, the enthusiasm to work for the benefit of the company is lost. In 1964, a federal law was adopted regulating discrimination in employment based on color, religion, gender, and national origin. According to the Act, an employer may not disrespect or humiliate an employee’s personality regardless of the conditions of work (“Title VII,” n.d.). In the case study, John is humiliated and groundlessly insulted by his supervisor, apparently because of his supervisor’s racist tendencies. The man must file a complaint with a commission for labor discrimination cases, which must be supported by evidence. According to Perry & Heller (2017), a complaint about a hostile work environment requires that the complainant falls into a legally protected category: race, religion, sexual orientation, pregnancy, age, and physical health. In addition, the man must be able to demonstrate humiliation. Finally, the complaint must be justified by a change in a work environment that has become destructive to the employee.

Can John Make a Complaint

Based on the above, it is not difficult to understand that John has every reason to count on filing a complaint. The manager regularly calls the employee an idiot, although no such insults have been noticed against non-Hispanic employees. In that case, discriminatory practices by national origin and skin color should be mentioned. It was essential to clarify that the EEOC supported people who suffered from racism and discrimination in the workplace. Indeed, management’s disrespectful approach has a negative impact on an employee’s professional status, so John is concerned. John should have a prima facie case, as a complaint is not enough, just an oral statement or blind faith. For this reason, the next time he communicates with the supervisor, the man may begin taping to confirm that he is insulted or insulted by other Hispanic-origin employees through derogatory language.

Ability to Protect the Employer

Based on legislative practice concerning labor conflicts, there is no basis for a complaint to be appealed to a superior. On the contrary, all the elements confirm that the boss acting on behalf of the employer commits a professional crime, so that sanctions will be imposed on them. It is worth noting that the manager’s personal rights are not affected, as only the labor relations between the leader and the subordinate are considered. An additional factor contributing to the lawsuit’s development will be deemed to be the HR Management Division’s protocol drawn up when John approached them for assistance.

Progress of the Complaint Process

The first step is for John — if the man is discriminated against, he should contact an EEO counselor at his workplace. As a general rule, the time required to approve a complaint should not exceed 45 days from the date of humiliation (“Overview of federal sector,” 2016). It is possible to file a complaint in person or by mail, including online. From the time of filing, if the complaint is approved, EEOC has 180 days to investigate. This is followed by a hearing with the administrative judge, who will issue a final verdict on the case of discrimination. Only after the application has been processed, formed, and approved does John have the right to go to the Supreme Court.

References

Overview of federal sector EEO complaint process.” (2016). U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Web.

Perry, S. & Heller. (2017). “3 things that may indicate a hostile work environment.”

Schwartz Perry & Heller. Web.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.” (n.d.). U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Web.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2022, February 28). Discrimination in the Workplace: A Case Study. https://studycorgi.com/discrimination-in-the-workplace-a-case-study/

Work Cited

"Discrimination in the Workplace: A Case Study." StudyCorgi, 28 Feb. 2022, studycorgi.com/discrimination-in-the-workplace-a-case-study/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2022) 'Discrimination in the Workplace: A Case Study'. 28 February.

1. StudyCorgi. "Discrimination in the Workplace: A Case Study." February 28, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/discrimination-in-the-workplace-a-case-study/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Discrimination in the Workplace: A Case Study." February 28, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/discrimination-in-the-workplace-a-case-study/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2022. "Discrimination in the Workplace: A Case Study." February 28, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/discrimination-in-the-workplace-a-case-study/.

This paper, “Discrimination in the Workplace: A Case Study”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.