Introduction
Edinburgh Depression screen is also known as Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale which is used to screen pregnant and postnatal women for emotional distress. It has ten questions for the correspondent to answer. Women are required to rate how for last been feeling for last seven days (Klein, Dougherty & Olino, 2005). It is made to check for depression within five minutes (Hollingshead, 1975). Beck depression inventory applies use of DSM-IV criteria. It evaluates extend in depression.
Edinburgh Depression screen
Depression is the second mainly common chronic disorder portrayed by primary care physicians. The severity in disability and suffering linked with depression are similar to those in most persistent medical situation (Hollingshead, 1975). Timely correct treatment and identification considerably reduces the pessimistic impact of depression in the majority patients. Drugs like antidepressants and psycho therapy are used to manage Edinburgh depression.
In the United States,” preventive services task force recently reviewed finding that patients did well when physicians acknowledged the symptoms of depression and gave right treatment made sure that they received appropriate treatment” (Kazdin, 1981).Based on this support, the Preventive Services Task Force issued new depression screening regulations, recommending on primary care by physicians to monitor their patients for depression. The Geriatric Depression Scale, Depression Anxiety Stress Scales and Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist are frequently recommended for mental health screening (Hollingshead, 1975).
Screening for postpartum depression is at present suggested in Australia and the USA, but not the UK. In the UK, the policy has shifted towards opportunistic case finding for postpartum depression (Kaslow, Rehm & Siegel, 1984).
Edinburgh Depression screen scale has been reviewed different researchers. They did review of screening tools for postpartum depression, which included a literature review done for several years. It focused on comparing the psychometric information individual report actions including the EPDS. The EPDS is agreed to be a screening tool for ante partum depression in pregnant women (Hollingshead, 1975).
Other researcher has done studies of EPDS (Hollingshead, 1975) did a study of screening instruments for postpartum depression, which incorporated a literature review. The EPDS is obtainable in many languages such as French, Dutch, Swedish, Spanish, Chinese, Thai, Turkish and Arabic (Kaslow, Rehm & Siegel, 1984).
Postpartum depression is extremely widespread amongst women. It is a chief public health problem there is a broad variety of occurrence of postnatal depression amid women from diverse countries. Recognition and assessment of F mental disorder is significant. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale is prominently used instrument for evaluating postnatal depression. When it is used in non-postnatal women, the scale is called the Edinburgh Depression Scale. It has been revealed that the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale gives clinically significant outcome as a mental screening instrument. It is receptive to variation in pre natal and postnatal (Kaslow, Rehm & Siegel, 1984).
Current analysis of justification studies of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale accomplished that; most studies examined indicated elevated sensitivity for the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, in spite of the fact that hesitation remained concerning the comparability amid the specificity and compassion estimates of the diverse Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale versions (Kazdin, 1981). “The authors reported that since the Spanish version of the EPDS contained a number of words not used in Mexico, they had changed those words for more colloquial ones used for the general population in the validity values for Turkish version” (Kaslow, Rehm & Siegel, 1984). However, not excellent and thus recommended that it needs to be improved for use (Kaslow, Rehm & Siegel, 1984).
“The intention of the study was to interpret the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale to Persian (Iranian language), to authenticate and use the questionnaire in clinical and epidemiological studies” (Wisner, Parry & Piontek, 2002).Beck depression Inventory is long and detailed. It is limited for use by psychiatrists and skilled personnel. It makes them very unfriendly in managing daily procedures in examination processes. “Procedures need to be dependable valid, reliability; accuracy and reproducibility are important qualities for a discriminative instrument. For an evaluative instrument, responsiveness (as indicated by sensitivity to detect changes in patients who have improved or deteriorated) is also essential” (Kazdin, 1981).
According to Jané, Araneda, Valero & Domènech-LLaberia (2000), one of the tools that could be considered for use as a discriminative measure in the rehabilitation context is the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). It was at first industrialized as a short questionnaire intended to recognize scientific for anxiety and depression in universal medical outpatient. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale was introduced in 1980s.since then it has been applied in various teaching. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale popularity has gone high in clinical sector. it has made it easier for hospital management to work (Wisner, Parry & Piontek, 2002).
Conclusion
Edinburgh Depression screen scale has been reviewed different researchers. They did review of screening tools for postpartum depression, which included a literature review done for several years. It focused on comparing the psychometric information individual report actions including the EPDS. The EPDS is agreed to be a screening tool for ante partum depression in pregnant women (Hollingshead, 1975).
Postpartum depression is extremely widespread amongst women. It is a chief public health problem there is a broad variety of occurrence of postnatal depression amid women from diverse countries. Recognition and assessment of F mental disorder is significant (Kaslow, Rehm & Siegel, 1984).
Edinburgh Depression screen scale has been reviewed different researchers. They did review of screening tools for postpartum depression, which included a literature review done for several years. It focused on comparing the psychometric information individual report actions including the EPDS. The EPDS is agreed to be a screening tool for ante partum depression in pregnant women (Hollingshead, 1975).
References
Hollingshead, A.B. (1975). Four-factor index of social status. Unpublished manual. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
Jané, M.C., Araneda, N., Valero, S. & Domènech-LLaberia, E. (2000). Evaluación de la sintomatología depresiva del preescolar: correspondencia entre los informes de padres y de maestros. Psicothema, 12, pp. 212-215.
Kaslow, N.P., Rehm, L.P. & Siegel, A.W. (1984). Social-cognitive and cognitive correlates of depression in children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 12, 605-620.
Kazdin, A.E. (1981). Assessment techniques for childhood depression. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 20, 358-375.
Klein, D.N., Dougherty, L.R. & Loin, T.M. (2005). Toward guidelines for evidence-based assessment of depression in children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 34, pp. 412-432.
Petti, T.A. (1982). Self-report and interview measures of childhood and adolescent depression. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 23, pp. 437-457.
Wisner, K. L., Parry B, L. & Piontek, C. M. (2002). Postpartum depression.Journal of Medicine, 347, pp 194-199.