How Psychology Contributed to the Legal System

Psychology involves and contributes to the process of behavioral analysis, thoughts, feelings, perceptions, as well as emotions within personalities and the general society. The lawyers concern for psychology as well as psychologist’s involvement in law is traceable back in a lengthy period. It is critical to observe that questions of psychological basis were being asked in law before psychology grew as a distinct discipline. For example, the 1833 England Commissioners were happy to acknowledge their debt to Cesare Beccaria (Collins, 2011). However, they were not confident that “all appropriate conditions as well as aggravations would be articulated sufficiently in the legal process.” Consequently, unlike to Beccaria, the elements they were ready to assume cognizance of in differentiating among “gradations of felony, shades of culpability, as well as alternatives of punishment”. These embodied several offenders’ individual characteristics which of course Beccaria could have neglected “as probably to result into bias or inequality.” From this, it is notable that even in the ancient days; the legal system had to be grappled with nascent psychology. Moreover, it is observable that the law didn’t discover its conclusions adequately palatable (Turtle, Read, Lindsay & Brimacombe, 2008).

The present linkage between psychology and law remains intertwined. For instance, Psychology underpins several legal decisions. In addition, it remains at the foundation of several legal principles. Legal evidence might rest upon psychological state and extent of harm, particularly on concerns of duress and trauma, or questions might emerge concerning the extents of provocation (Collins, 2011). This might specifically apply to the several infamous cases in which battered females have killed their violent husbands. Additionally, legal decisions can also rely on the forecasting of future behavior. For example, finding out which position lies in the child’s interests.

References

Collins, H. (2011). Modern Law Review. The Modern Law Review Limited, vol. 27(6), 656-668.

Turtle, J., Read, J., Lindsay, D. & Brimacombe, C. (2008). Toward a more informative psychological science of eyewitness evidence. Applied Cognitive Psychology, vol. 22, 769–778.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2021, December 26). How Psychology Contributed to the Legal System. https://studycorgi.com/how-psychology-contributed-to-the-legal-system/

Work Cited

"How Psychology Contributed to the Legal System." StudyCorgi, 26 Dec. 2021, studycorgi.com/how-psychology-contributed-to-the-legal-system/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2021) 'How Psychology Contributed to the Legal System'. 26 December.

1. StudyCorgi. "How Psychology Contributed to the Legal System." December 26, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/how-psychology-contributed-to-the-legal-system/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "How Psychology Contributed to the Legal System." December 26, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/how-psychology-contributed-to-the-legal-system/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2021. "How Psychology Contributed to the Legal System." December 26, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/how-psychology-contributed-to-the-legal-system/.

This paper, “How Psychology Contributed to the Legal System”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.