The changes in the social structure began in the 18th century during the industrial revolution. On a very fundamental level, these ongoing modifications provided new working and living strategies, transforming the social design (Risjord, 2014). In this way, the insurgency shifted people’s perspectives from their homes to their workplaces. The Industrial Revolution is one of the factors that contributed to the advancement of social science. Auguste Comte, the father of human science, has encouraged an interest in noticing and focusing on the general population during the current upheaval (Risjord, 2014). As previously said, modern trouble has resulted in significant observable changes in the universal populace. Individuals’ lives changed due to current unrest, both on a social level and in their working surroundings. Individuals began a mass relocation to urban communities due to urbanization and the increase in potential open doors in metropolitan zones (Risjord, 2014). Consequently, social conditions shifted, and theorists believed that the existing circumstances resulted from numerous sociologies such as social theory and financial problems.
Progress was also central in nineteenth-century social development ideas, and evolutionism was the common ground shared by the century’s most influential favorable hypotheses. Evolutionism assumes that people progressed along a single line of improvement (Risjord, 2014); improvement was predetermined and unavoidable because of its comparison to specific laws. Social orders were more advanced in this advancement than others, and Western culture was the most exceptional, thus revealing the rest of the population (Risjord, 2014). This line of reasoning has since been challenged and refuted. Therefore, sociological changes that sociologists would have to consider during development include fall of state or degradation, cyclic, reoccurrence, and continuity of change or events.
Reference
Risjord, M. (2014). Philosophy of social science: A contemporary introduction. Routledge.