Bargués-Pedreny, Pol, and Jessica Schmidt. “Learning to be Postmodern in an All Too Modern World: “Whatever Action” in International Climate Change Imaginaries.” Global Society 33, no. 1 (2019): 45-65.
The article by Bargués-Pedreny and Schmidt aims to identify the existing contradictions in climate regulation issues. In particular, the study is devoted to assessing contemporary initiatives designed to address environmental issues. Current regulatory mechanisms are assessed as insufficiently effective due to the emphasis on the consequences rather than the causes of climate change. The researchers have authored numerous publications on contemporary environmental problems and issues associated with their perception and resolution, and the credibility of the study in question is evident. The value of this work lies in the discussion of the little effectiveness of current practices designed to address the effects of climate change effects, and this information can be used to identify gaps and weaknesses.
Bodansky, Daniel, Jutta Brunnée, and Lavanya Rajamani. International Climate Change Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
In their book, Bodansky, Brunnée, and Rajamani evaluate the existing international legal norms and regulations and draw attention to the complexity of environmental management in a global context. The book primarily focuses on climate issues, which is one of its main benefits and discusses these problems as pressing ones in the context of modernity. Despite some positive steps, maintaining a consistently high level of environmental control is impossible due to distinctive legislative practices. The value of this guide lies in the coverage of a wide range of challenges and potential methods of resolution through the existing international agreements. The book is relevant and presented by a reputable publisher, which confirms the credibility of its authorship.
Broto, Vanesa Castan. “Urban Governance and the Politics of Climate Change.” World Development 93 (2017): 1-15.
The role of cities and their governments is the subject of Broto’s research. Networked forms of control and the similarity of management practices in modern urban areas are seen as potentially positive drivers for addressing the current environmental challenges. In addition, the sophistication of technology industries is also assessed as an essential aspect of targeted climate change mitigation efforts. One of the main values of this study is a comprehensive assessment that addresses government forms in cities, the distribution of powers, and other criteria related to the specifics of environmental regulation. The article is peer-reviewed and published on a reputable academic resource; therefore, the credibility of its authorship is not in question.
Henderson, Conway W. Understanding International Law. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
The book by Henderson touches upon the issues of managing global environmental regulations in the context of international legal principles. Particular attention is paid to the challenges of control due to an insufficiently developed legal framework, although some positive steps are noted, for instance involving a larger number of participating countries. The value of this book lies in its analysis of the distinctive forms and manifestations of legal conventions in relation to climate change issues, and some of the constraints and barriers mentioned can be utilized as target areas for intervention. As an evidence base, various cases of law violations at the global level are cited, and the author’s position as a political scientist corresponds to the declared academic status of the book.
Iacobuta, Gabriela, Navroz K. Dubash, Prabhat Upadhyaya, Mekdelawit Deribe, Niklas Höhne. “National Climate Change Mitigation Legislation, Strategy, and Targets: A Global Update.” Climate Policy 18, no. 9 (2018): 1114-1132.
The article by Iacobuta et al. addresses the issues of international control over climate change from the perspective of participation in special projects, for instance, the Paris Agreement. In the study, the ever-growing number of countries involved in the fight against environmental problems is seen as a positive step. As a justification, the scope of emission coverage is considered, and specific figures are cited in favor of advances in this area. The key value of this article is real numbers that highlight the work done to date, as well as accurate data on global environmental activities in percentage correlations. All the information is relevant, and each of the authors has already been involved in research on environmental protection and government sustainability in a global context.
Jotzo, Frank, Joanna Depledge, and Harald Winkler. “US and International Climate Policy under President Trump.” Climate Policy 18, no. 7 (2018): 813-817.
The U.S. position on environmental management policies under the Trump presidency is the subject of an article by Jotzo, Depledge, and Winkler. The researchers criticize the president’s program for his attempts to cut funds to combat climate change and, in particular, withdraw from the Paris Agreement. The Trump Administration’s regulatory practices are viewed as counterproductive and contrary to the global idea of addressing the existing environmental issues. The main value of the study is a list of gaps and shortcomings made by the government of the country regarding the topic under consideration. The article is published in a reputable international journal, which speaks of its authors’ authority and their right to speak with criticism confirmed by the facts.
Nissan, Hannah, Lisa Goddard, Erin Coughlan de Perez, John Furlow, Walter Baethgen, Madeleine C. Thomson, and Simon J. Mason. “On the Use and Misuse of Climate Change Projections in International Development.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 10, no. 3 (2019): e579.
In their research, Nissan et al. focus on the effectiveness of selected projects dedicated to the control of global environmental problems. Specific nuances are analyzed from the standpoint of relevance to modern conditions and the possibility of improving the quality of targeted practices. An individual role is assigned to the discussion of measures applied in public and private sectors, as well as the comparison among these measures. The value of the study lies in assessing the suitability of the steps taken with the ultimate goals, including the discussion of mistakes and limitations. The authors are reputable, and the article’s peer-reviewed status proves its credibility.
Oberthür, Sebastian, and Lisanne Groen. “Explaining Goal Achievement in International Negotiations: the EU and the Paris Agreement on Climate Change.” Journal of European Public Policy 25, no. 5 (2018): 708-727.
The environmental policies of the EU countries in terms of the Paris Agreement are the topic of Oberthür and Groen’s research. The main focus is on the accomplishments realized through the participation of states in this agreement, including implications from domestic and global perspectives. The EU’s performance is seen as the result of engaging available resources to maintain a stable targeted activity to address the current environmental problems. The study is valuable for its historical references, the analysis of individual states’ contributions, and the in-depth assessment of the Paris Agreement. The credibility of the article is high, and the researchers’ authority may be explained due to the publication of the study in one of the leading European journals.
Seo, S. Niggol. “Beyond the Paris Agreement: Climate Change Policy Negotiations and Future Directions.” Regional Science Policy & Practice 9, no. 2 (2017): 121-140.
Niggol assesses the possibility of the practical application of the Paris Agreement’s provisions within the framework of addressing global environmental problems. As a justification base, individual projects are presented, and the results of conferences on the relevant topic are mentioned. The discussion touches on countries around the world and cites excerpts from selected summits, which is the value of this study. In addition, precise data on individual states’ contribution to pollution abatement is provided, which also increases the credibility of the study. The author operates with deep data and uses a large volume of references, which speaks of his research experience and authority.
Zhang, Yong-Xiang, Qing-Chen Chao, Qiu-Hong Zheng, and Lei Huang. “The Withdrawal of the US from the Paris Agreement and Its Impact on Global Climate Change Governance.” Advances in Climate Change Research 8, no. 4 (2017): 213-219.
In their research, Zhang et al. analyze the consequences of the US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement from a global perspective. Government measures taken by different countries to address climate change issues are viewed in the context of cooperation and joint practices designed to improve the quality of targeted work. The real impacts of the US withdrawal from the agreement are valuable topics of this article and potential new models for developing relationships at the global level complement the discussion. A wide range of related issues has been touched upon, in particular, the role of individual governments in the global practice of combating environmental problems. The credibility of the authorship can be justified by the peer-reviewed of status of the article and its publication in an authoritative scholarly journal.
Bibliography
Bargués-Pedreny, Pol, and Jessica Schmidt. “Learning to be Postmodern in an All Too Modern World: “Whatever Action” in International Climate Change Imaginaries.” Global Society 33, no. 1 (2019): 45-65.
Bodansky, Daniel, Jutta Brunnée, and Lavanya Rajamani. International Climate Change Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
Broto, Vanesa Castan. “Urban Governance and the Politics of Climate Change.” World Development 93 (2017): 1-15.
Henderson, Conway W. Understanding International Law. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
Iacobuta, Gabriela, Navroz K. Dubash, Prabhat Upadhyaya, Mekdelawit Deribe, Niklas Höhne. “National Climate Change Mitigation Legislation, Strategy and Targets: A Global Update.” Climate Policy 18, no. 9 (2018): 1114-1132.
Jotzo, Frank, Joanna Depledge, and Harald Winkler. “US and International Climate Policy under President Trump.” Climate Policy 18, no. 7 (2018): 813-817.
Nissan, Hannah, Lisa Goddard, Erin Coughlan de Perez, John Furlow, Walter Baethgen, Madeleine C. Thomson, and Simon J. Mason. “On the Use and Misuse of Climate Change Projections in International Development.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 10, no. 3 (2019): e579.
Oberthür, Sebastian, and Lisanne Groen. “Explaining Goal Achievement in International Negotiations: the EU and the Paris Agreement on Climate Change.” Journal of European Public Policy 25, no. 5 (2018): 708-727.
Seo, S. Niggol. “Beyond the Paris Agreement: Climate Change Policy Negotiations and Future Directions.” Regional Science Policy & Practice 9, no. 2 (2017): 121-140.
Zhang, Yong-Xiang, Qing-Chen Chao, Qiu-Hong Zheng, and Lei Huang. “The Withdrawal of the US from the Paris Agreement and Its Impact on Global Climate Change Governance.” Advances in Climate Change Research 8, no. 4 (2017): 213-219.