Introduction
The term “international trade” refers to all commercial dealings conducted between countries on a global scale. Consumer products, including clothing, electronic devices, raw materials, and food, are among the regularly traded items in international commerce. Also included on this list are capital goods, such as machinery. Other transactions include services such as purchasing international patents and travel services. Transactions relating to international trade are evidenced by the processing of monetary payments on a global scale (Balaam & Dillman, 2018).
Within the trading states, the banking systems of both commercial and central banks play crucial roles in executing these payments. Engaging in international trade and the accompanying financial transactions provides a nation with the goods it lacks in exchange for those in huge quantities. When combined with many other economic strategies, transactions such as these tend to raise the standard of living in a country. A significant portion of modern international relations history appears to have contributed to promoting freedom between nations while commerce was taking place.
This topic was chosen because of its significance to the global economy. Therefore, the primary purpose of this article is to explore the history, theories, strengths, and weaknesses of the international structure of trade as a key part of the world economy. In light of this, the problem statement for the paper entails explaining how the component of the structure of international trade plays a significant part in the continuity of the world economy.
Ancient Structures of International Trade
In ancient times, and possibly even before the dawn of human history, various classes of people and regions traded goods and services with one another. This practice formed the foundation of modern international trade. On the other hand, international trade refers to the exchange of goods and services between nations or their citizens (Gorgoni et al., 2018).
Only with the rise of the modern nation-state around the end of the European Middle Ages did the first encounters and elaborations of this kind of trade begin (Alt et al., 2017). The study of international trade as a field emerged as a direct consequence of early efforts to investigate the nature and function of the state on a global scale (Wang & Ang, 2018). Consequently, the attempts made in antiquity to describe the roles involved in international trade necessitated the development of the term “mercantilism.”
Mercantilism
Mercantilism reached its peak in terms of influence on European thought between the 16th and 17th centuries, with its analysis focusing directly on the state’s well-being and prosperity. Consideration of the state’s welfare was central to mercantilism (Weingast, 2018). It emphasized that the accumulation of riches, particularly in gold, served as an important element of state policy (Weingast, 2018). Mercantilists regarded the benefits of gold so highly that they were almost considered an item of faith. Consequently, they did not explain why the search for gold reflected the highest priority in their economic plans.
The examination of mercantilism was based on the assumption that the nation’s interests would inevitably be at odds with one another. Therefore, one nation can increase its trade to compete with others (Weingast, 2018). As a result, governments were expected to take the initiative in imposing wage and price controls and to encourage the importation of raw materials and the exportation of finished products. At the same time, governments were required to impose controls on the exports and imports of raw materials and finished products (Doh, 2017). The nation made a concerted effort to provide its inhabitants with access to the commerce channels and resources monopolized by its colonies.
The mercantilist economic ideology called for a straightforward approach to trade policy. This approach favored exports over imports to maximize the country’s gold reserves while minimizing international business costs (Weingast, 2018). The theories of the mercantilists were considered to have a limited intellectual depth. In addition, the policy of their trade sought to extend beyond rationalization to follow the interests of the emerging classes of merchants who sought larger market sizes. The result is a focus on increasing exports, combined with a restriction on the number of products imported to defend against the effects of competition.
The Navigation Act, passed by the English in 1651 and in effect until 1849, is credited with fostering a significant mercantilist attitude (Weingast, 2018). The Act guaranteed that its home country would continue to have reservations about the right to trade with its colonies. In contrast, it made it unlawful to import goods from countries that were not part of Europe unless such goods were transported in shipments with English flags flying over them. The French government was also considering adopting this approach at the time.
Liberalism
Around the middle of the 18th century, there was a significant pushback against the mercantilist philosophy that was prevalent at the time (Smith & Youngs, 2018). The Physiocrats were a school of economic thought in France that advocated for free commerce and creative freedom in the workplace. On the other side, in his book published in 1776 titled “The Wealth of Nations,” an English economist named Adam Smith illustrated the benefits connected to the absence of trade constraints.
The businesspeople and economists of the time opposed the extremely high customs duties and their ever-more-prohibitive policies. They supported the ongoing trade agreement negotiations with the powers based outside the country. The shift in mentality led to numerous instances of signed agreements about the new restriction-free ideas and liberal principles on international trade. These agreements were signed as a result of the change in mindset. Among these is the Anglo-French Treaty of 1786, which brought an end to the protracted economic conflict between the two countries (Smith & Youngs, 2018). The long-running commercial competition between England and France finally came to an end.
Following the propositions made by Adam Smith in his book, the fundamental notions communicated by the mercantilists were flawed and ultimately proved indefensible. On the other hand, mercantilism continued to influence the ideas and practices of certain nations. The idea that the government should, at least to some extent, prevent foreign goods from entering the market to protect domestic manufacturers from foreign competition has become a popular justification for protectionist economic policies on the national level.
The idea that the government should ensure it keeps foreign merchandise out of the market provided support for this position (Smith & Youngs, 2018). It was becoming common practice to levy customs duties to replace outright prohibitions on imports, the majority of which eventually resulted in a reduction in both frequency and number.
Protectionism
Later in the 1800s, a response supporting protectionism emerged in all Western parts of the globe. For example, Germany instituted a consistent protectionist policy, which was adopted by many other states over a short period (Mehaylo, 2019). The United States of America saw a significant increase in its tariffs just after the end of the Civil War in the 1860s and again in the 1890s under the McKinley Tariff Act, which was an extremely protectionist piece of legislation.
The United Kingdom was the only country in the world that adhered to the principles of free trade. However, compared to the mercantilist policies prevalent during the 17th century, the protectionism of the final quarter of the 19th century proved relatively mild. Its revival occurred between the two world wars. 1913 marked the beginning of widespread economic liberty (Felbermayr et al., 2017). As a direct result, customs duties were lowered and made more consistent, while quantitative limits were removed entirely. Since converting other currencies into gold was easy, this precious metal became the standard medium of exchange worldwide.
The New Mercantilism
As the hostilities of the wars came to a close, the globe’s economic institutions and trading systems became so fragmented that it was difficult for the world to recover from the devastation. The aftermath of World War I led to a shift in the typical conditions and policies governing international trade. This led to a new alignment. In the first half-decade of the era following World War II, establishing several elements of wartime regulation and control marked me.
As a result of the economic downturn that occurred in the 1920s, and directly due to the commercial privileges gained by states like Germany, whose currencies had undergone significant depreciation, many countries were compelled to implement new restrictions on international trade. These restrictions included tariffs and quotas (Losev, 2017). The resultant influence of protectionism impacted the global economic system due to the pressure that emerged from the economic conditions and the ideology of nationalism, rather than the policies of policymakers who might have subscribed to a particular doctrine.
In May 1927, the League of Nations convened the first conference to establish the World Economic Organization, aiming to mitigate the gradual yet steady increase in trade obstacles imposed by customs (Losev, 2017). A world convention that was a balanced global treaty of trade and the most detailed to date was subscribed to by 29 countries, including the primary industrial states. This was the most recent milestone in the process.
The convention served as a forerunner to the organizations that were subsequently established to comply with the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) of 1947 (Losev, 2017). However, the trade deal reached in 1927 had no significant impact on the real world. During the era known as the “Great Depression” of the 1930s, unemployment rates in senior states reached unfathomable highs, which caused hiccups in the protectionist policies that were in place at the time.
Theoretical Approach
State Power Theory of International Political Economy
The degree to which no restrictions are placed on the free movement of commodities is one of the defining characteristics of the international trade structure. A theory of state power in the context of the global political economy may provide the best explanation (Balaam & Dillman, 2018). The maximum of national objectives serves as the starting point for the theory, which presupposes that the nature of the global economic movement is such that it is determined by the actions of nations working toward these objectives (Oatley, 2018).
It is possible to establish a systematic relationship between the degree of openness in global trade systems and each of the four goals—political power, economic growth, social stability, and total national income—for nations of varying relative sizes and levels of development (Snider, 2017).
The above analysis suggests that there is a possibility of openness in the presence of the hegemonic spread of economic power. This conclusion is required since it is a necessary consequence of the study. For this reason, there is a presentation of trade proportions, per capita income, time series data on tariff levels, regional concentration, the percentage of world commerce, national income, and the share of world investment (Balaam & Dillman, 2018).
The trade proportions, time-series data on tariff levels, and regional concentration all help explain the degree of openness within the trading system. On the other hand, the power distribution among states can be described by their national income, the proportion of global investment, income per capita, and the percentage of global commerce (Oatley, 2018). The findings suggest that the theory of state power should be revised to account for the political restraints imposed on national action by domestic factors.
Strengths
The international trade structure has significantly more potential than domestic trade. While domestic trade deals with goods that can be produced in one country and sold in another, international trade relates to selling goods, which are produced in one country, worldwide. This means that there are numerous growth opportunities, making it more exciting to work in this industry than in others (Chen et al., 2018).
Second, the international trade sector offers more opportunities for growth than other careers because it encompasses a wide range of job types. For example, some jobs will involve traveling to different countries daily or researching new products before going on business trips overseas. Other jobs will involve developing relationships with local businesses, such as suppliers or distributors, so that they can help sell your products overseas when they return to the U.S.
Weaknesses
Several flaws mar the structure of international trade. The absence of standardization is one of these problems. This lack of standardization can result in challenges, including the inability to compare costs across international borders, difficulties in enforcing contracts, and a lack of transparency (Gourevitch, 2021). Another one of our flaws is a lack of coordination among the various nations.
This can result in the establishment of trade barriers, such as tariffs and quotas, both of which can potentially make the international trade system less effective. In conclusion, the framework of international commerce is susceptible to disruptions caused by calamities such as earthquakes and tsunamis, economic downturns, and political unrest (Kramarz et al., 2020). These shocks can potentially hinder trade flows and result in a general decline in trade volume.
The Simplified Theory of Competitive Advantage
For the reasons of exposition, the comparative advantage theory is typically first outlined as an interaction involving only two products and two states. However, this is not a necessary restriction of the theory. Production costs are always measured in terms of the time and effort required to create a product, so that’s something to keep in mind (Dean et al., 2020).
For instance, a cloth unit may be priced as two hours of labor. We can use X and Y, as shown in Table 1, as examples for the two countries, and wine and fabric as examples of the two commodities they produce. The following are the times required to create one unit of either of the goods mentioned above in either of the two jurisdictions:
Table 1: The Simplified Competitive Advantage
The production efficiency of country Y is lower than that of country X. So, it takes longer for workers in country Y to get one use out of one unit of cloth or wine. Climatic differences, differences in employee skill or training, differences in the sizes of available equipment and tools, and other variables all may contribute to the overall relative inefficiency. Because of his lack of interest in tracking down their source, Ricardo considered the connection meaningless.
Since country X demonstrates a higher efficiency in producing both fabric and wine, it enjoys a decisive competitive advantage in both industries. It appears that country Y has little chance of succeeding against country X in a competition, and it would be significantly outmatched if it were to engage in trade with X.
According to Ricardo, the above statement is not accurate. The most important factor is that, in producing wine, workers in country Y require only twice as much time per unit as workers in country X. In contrast, the time required for producing clothing is three times as great (Gani, 2017). Suggesting that Ricardo believed country Y had a comparative edge in the winemaking industry. Both X and Y countries appear ahead in terms of their real income.
If nation Y focuses on wine production, it will ship some of its wine to country X. If country X focuses on clothing production, it will ship some of its clothing to country Y. Although country X’s workers can make wine of comparable quality and quantity to that manufactured by Y’s workers in a duration that is only half that required by country X’s workers, country X seems to prefer leaving the manufacture of wine to country Y.
The Theory of Comparative Advantage
The “Classical Economics” school in Britain began largely as a reaction against the inconsistencies introduced by the policies and ideas incorporated into mercantilism. Since Adam Smith is still considered the school’s founder from the 18th century, his anti-mercantilist approach as a reaction to mercantilist trade policies is portrayed in his work from 1776 titled “The Wealth of Nations” (Dean et al., 2020).
The primary focus of Smith’s argument is on the positive aspects of specialization as the source of rising output levels. Additionally, he views international trade as another example of specialized activity. Smith focuses on regions of the world with limited availability of production resources. At the same time, human wants cannot be completely satisfied; therefore, every state must specialize in producing different types of goods according to the types of goods it can and is willing to produce (Kanayo & Mbangata, 2020).
As a result, the nations should consider exporting portions of such productions in exchange for other foreign products they cannot produce themselves. However, Smith did not elaborate on these ideas. An additional well-known world economist, David Ricardo, developed Smith’s propositions into the principles of ‘competitive advantage’ based on Smith’s work. Ricardo made several significant changes to his previous work related to international commerce.
Amplification
In the most recent iteration of comparative advantage theory, English political economist and philosopher John Stuart Mill argued that pinpointing the precise post-trade ratio is still a demand-and-supply-oriented problem (Pflüger & Tabuchi, 2019). At every plausible intermediate ratio, say in a range between 1:2 and 1:3, country X might require importing a certain amount of wine and exporting a given size of garments. At that exchange rate, specific clothing and wine must be imported and exported from country Y.
However, for whichever intermediate ratio is picked randomly, the export-import volumes of nation X are not to match those of country Y. Normally, there will be only one such ratio in the middle. Once they reach this ratio, a permanent equilibrium will be established between the quantities of goods traded between these two countries (Pflüger & Tabuchi, 2019). Therefore, stability will result in a loss of profit from goods trade.
Sources of Comparative Advantage
The British classical economists acknowledged that there are disparities in productivity between states. They did not attempt to outline the types of things a state would import or export. In the 20th century, global economists developed many hypotheses in an attempt to explain why states demonstrate disparities in their productivity levels. This component shapes the comparative advantage and, often, the entire manner of international trade. Natural resources, commodity production cycles, large-scale economies of production, and endowment variables are all examples of what economists refer to as “sources of comparative advantage” in international trade.
Conclusion
All monetary exchanges between nations make up international trade. Commodities were the main items traded by these countries in international trade. These commodities included electronics, clothing, food, raw materials, and capital goods such as machinery. Services such as acquiring patents from foreign countries and transportation services are examples of other transactions.
When private banking and central banking systems in trading countries perform critical functions, internationally initiated financial transactions facilitate international trade. Trade and other forms of international finance are conducted so that countries can acquire the goods they need in exchange for the relatively small quantities of goods they produce.
Together with other economic strategies, deals like this appear to help raise a country’s standard of living. Freedom of trade between nations appears to have been a primary focus of most modern international relations. Natural resources, technology, the commodity production cycle, endowment, and large-scale economies of production variables all contribute to a country’s comparative advantages in international commerce.
Reference List
Alt, J.E., Frieden, J., Gelligan, M.J., Rodrik, D. and Rogowski, R., 2017. The political economy of international trade: Enduring puzzles and an agenda for inquiry. In Global Trade (pp. 151-180). Routledge.
Balaam, D. N., & Dillman, B. (2018). Introduction to international political economy. Routledge, 556. Web.
Chen, B., Li, J.S., Wu, X.F., Han, M.Y., Zeng, L., Li, Z. and Chen, G.Q., 2018. Global energy flows embodied in international trade: A combination of environmentally extended input–output analysis and complex network analysis. Applied Energy, 210, pp.98-107.
Dean, E., Elardo, J., Green, M., Wilson, B., and Berger, S., 2020. Absolute and comparative advantage. Principles of Economics: Scarcity and Social Provisioning (2nd Ed.). Web.
Doh, J., Rodrigues, S., Saka-Helmhout, A. and Makhija, M., 2017. International business responses to institutional voids. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(3), pp.293-307.
Felbermayr, G., Kinzius, L. and Yalcin, E., 2017. Hidden protectionism: Non-tariff barriers and implications for international trade (No. 91). ifo Forschungsberichte. Web.
Gani, A., 2017. The Logistics Performance Effect in International Trade. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 33(4), 279-288.
Gorgoni, S., Amighini, A., & Smith, M., 2018. Automotive international trade networks: A comparative analysis over the last two decades. Network Science, 6(4), 571-606.
Gourevitch, P. A., 2021. International trade, domestic coalitions, and liberty: comparative responses to the crisis of 1873–1896. In The Political Economy (pp. 279-299). Routledge.
Kanayo, O. and Mbangata, T., 2020. A Comparative Analysis of Macroeconomic Outcomes amongst the BRICS (2000-2015). Journal of International Economics (0976-0792), 11(1). Web.
Kramarz, F., Martin, J., and Mejean, I., 2020. Volatility in the small and the large: The lack of diversification in international trade. Journal of International Economics, 122, 103276.
Losev, A., 2017. On the Threshold of New Mercantilism. Russia in Global Affairs, 15(1), pp.70-79. Web.
Mehaylo, J.A., 2019. More Tariffs, More Protection [ism]. Suffolk J. Trial & App. Advoc., 25, p.125.
Oatley, T. (2018). International political economy. Routledge, 412. Web.
Pflüger, M., and Tabuchi, T., 2019. Comparative advantage, agglomeration economies, and trade costs. Journal of Urban Economics, 109, pp.1-13. Web.
Smith, M.H., and Youngs, R., 2018. The EU and the global order: Contingent liberalism. The International Spectator, 53(1), pp.45-56.
Snider, E.A., 2017. International Political Economy and the New Middle East. PS: Political Science & Politics, 50(3), pp.664-667.
Wang, H., and Ang, B. W., 2018. Assessing the role of international trade in global CO2 emissions: An index decomposition analysis approach. Applied Energy, 218, 146-158.
Weingast, B.R., 2018. War, Trade, and Mercantilism: Reconciling Adam Smith’s Three Theories of the British Empire. Available at SSRN 2915959. Web.