Annotated bibliography
Edwards, J. A. (2018). Make America great again: Donald Trump and redefining the US role in the world. Communication Quarterly, 66(2), 176-195.
The United States has been instrumental in maintaining global peace since the end of World War II. This country has facilitated peace talks between conflicting nations by advocating for negotiations instead of military solutions. The article above describes a redefined role of the U.S. in ensuring peace across the world. In essence, the authors have been objective in presenting current events describing international policy of the former administration. The credibility of this source is evaluated on depth and currency as vital elements of an informative research. Most importantly, the president has international roles and responsibilities to make essential leadership decisions about global diplomacy. This article will be useful in understanding moral conduct among public figures, such as political leaders (Edwards, 2018). They can declare peace or war, and hence require accuracy and caution when communicating publicly. The former U.S. president has been accused of inciting insurrection after his supporters attacked the Capitol. His words, in this case, describe the overall international contribution of America to global concessions. Redefining the roles of the U.S. administration will be critical in adopting the principles of moral and responsible leadership.
Garrett, K. N., & Bankert, A. (2020). The moral roots of partisan division: How moral conviction heightens affective polarization. British Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 621-640.
Winning presidential elections in the U.S. depends on the loyalty and commitment of voters. Individuals aspiring for this leadership position are sponsored by political parties, as evidenced in the U.S. and United Kingdom. For instance, the former country divides voters based on party affiliation between Republicans and Democrats (Garrett & Bankert, 2020). In essence, this article highlights the moral roots of supporting specific political parties. The authors identify discriminatory practices which result in political divisions, such as race, religion, and gender. The source is credible as it presents in-depth facts of antidiscrimination, chronologically based on the relevance of similar historic events in modern U.S. Most fundamentally, this information will help understand the moral responsibility of leaders approved to represent political parties during elections.
Nye, J. S. (2019). Do morals matter?: Presidents and foreign policy from FDR to Trump. Oxford University Press.
Morals are important for enhancing public leadership by heads of states and other politicians. They allow individuals to make collective decisions which incorporate insights from relevant stakeholders. This leadership approach is also important for enhancing global peace, as evidenced in different regions with civil conflicts. Essentially, this article is credible as its authors have specialized in the field of public and political leadership. The content is peer-reviewed by a team of professionals, hence, ascertaining authority to readers. Most importantly, this article will be useful in evaluating former President Donald Trump’s behavior and its impacts on moral conviction. This approach will compare personal traits which describe an effective presidency compared to former President Franklin D. Roosevelt (Nye, 2019). The immediate former leader has been accused of moral negligence during his presidency, which involved family separation and seeking favors prohibited by law. This behavior questions the competence of a president in protecting the basic social and political values.
Patzer, M., Voegtlin, C., & Scherer, A. G. (2018). The normative justification of integrative stakeholder engagement: A Habermasian view on responsible leadership. Business Ethics Quarterly, 28(3), 325-354.
A president works with many professionals who provide the important insights required for objective decision-making. Integrating stakeholder contribution improves the quality of a decision, as brainstorming identifies potential barriers against an agreement’s successful implementation. The article is important in understanding the relationship between integrative stakeholder engagement and responsible leadership. The authors have adopted the Habermasian view to provide substantial insights regarding the decent conduct of a president (Patzer et al., 2018). This approach enhances the credibility of this source based on the purpose intended for readers. The authors aim to transform the public sector by ensuring stakeholder contribution from all population categories. This article is useful in assessing the individual traits of former President Trump concerning a moral conviction for inciting insurrection as accused by political opponents. A leader must be held responsible for individual decisions which failed to integrate stakeholder contribution. For instance, the former president withdrew the U.S. from the Paris Climate Accord of 2016 without considering scientific input concerning global warming.
References
Edwards, J. A. (2018). Make America great again: Donald Trump and redefining the US role in the world. Communication Quarterly, 66(2), 176-195. Web.
Garrett, K. N., & Bankert, A. (2020). The moral roots of partisan division: How moral conviction heightens affective polarization. British Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 621-640. Web.
Nye, J. S. (2019). Do morals matter?: Presidents and foreign policy from FDR to Trump. Oxford University Press.
Patzer, M., Voegtlin, C., & Scherer, A. G. (2018). The normative justification of integrative stakeholder engagement: A Habermasian view on responsible leadership. Business Ethics Quarterly, 28(3), 325-354. Web.