Every organization is founded on the unity of teams and leaders and their cooperation, which results in efficiency and output. The healthcare field is among the most complicated fields since the lives and well-being of patients depend on the unity of the staff and leadership that helps manage the team members. However, while some leaders prefer a strict approach with more discipline, others see leadership as a nurturing position that maintains the cohesion of the departments.
At the given moment, I work in Highlands Advanced Rheumatology and Arthritis Center. The clinical setting involves 32 employees, with the center having such departments as general therapy, infusion room, X-ray department, laboratory, and clinical research department. The two individuals in the center are worth analyzing since their polar approaches manifest in their output and how they are perceived in the workplace. The first person is Millie, the office manager, who is frequently seen as an irrational employee who is frequently driven by her emotions. In contrast, Reba, a clinical manager, is seen as a diligent and careful person who does not make any impulsive decisions.
When it comes to the way these mentioned individuals perceive leadership, they differ majorly. Millie perceives her duty as a leader to control all operations and make sure that she is aware of all minor details. As a result, Millie’s aspiration as a leader is to be dictator Castro. In turn, Reba, being a manager in her leadership, aspires to be like Trump with his tell-it-like-it-is approach. The woman prefers to be straightforward yet reacts to the feedback of the team. In this case, Reba strives to achieve organizational unity and team building as a leader. However, Millie believes that, as a leader of the group, she must make productivity and professionalism a priority. As a result, she wants to achieve an efficient and enhanced educational process for nursing staff. Finally, after reviewing both individuals’ approaches, it can be seen that Reba and Millie both value the role of teams and care for productivity. However, while Millie is more open in communication and strives to create team cohesion, Reba wants to achieve efficiency through control and temper.
The final point to consider concerns organizational influences and how they limit the mentioned leaders’ desired practices. For instance, Millie, being an office manager, is responsible for the team’s success, and with the team in the center consisting of 32 people, it can be complicated for an authoritarian individual to ensure efficient collaboration. In this situation, if a leader aspires to create a team of experts who cooperate and provide impeccable results, it is necessary to involve every person in decision-making (Bomhof-Roordink et al., 2019). This will not only raise productivity but also ensure a rising level of competence and awareness (Bomhof-Roordink et al., 2019). Thus, Millie can create adequate training for nurses when involving every member in decision-making and create clear communication.
As for Reba, a clinical manager, her role requires efficient time management skills. In this case, if Reba wants cohesive teamwork, she needs to ensure quick making in order to prevent lagging and provide a normal pace of work. Considering that the woman might take time to make a decision, this can result in confusion among team members. However, a leader can still create unity in the clinic and ensure efficient decision-making by giving employees more autonomy (Nibbelink & Brewer, 2018). Still, any leader will be required to have an awareness of organizational operations since it will allow them to evaluate the situation with options when making a decision (Masic, 2022). Therefore, Reba can create a workplace with strong team building when she gives team members autonomy and maintains transparency.
Hence, there are different types of leaders, with some preferring a more controlling approach and others striving for collaboration. Reba and Millie are two managers, with Reba being more rational and cooperative and Millie being controlling and emotional. Reba, aspiring to have a robust team-building atmosphere, should focus on transparency and autonomy. Meanwhile, Millie, desiring to have a team with competent and aware nurses, should involve members in decision-making.
References
Bomhof-Roordink, H., Gärtner, F. R., Stiggelbout, A. M., & Pieterse, A. H. (2019). Key components of shared decision making models: a systematic review. BMJ Open, 9(12), 1-11. Web.
Masic I. (2022). Medical decision making. Acta Informatica Medica, 30(3), 230–235. Web.
Nibbelink, C. W., & Brewer, B. B. (2018). Decision-making in nursing practice: An integrative literature review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(5-6), 917–928. Web.