Leonard v. PepsiCo Inc. Case and Invalid Contract

Leonard v. PepsiCo, Inc. is a famous example of an invalid contract. In 1995, John Leonard under the influence of a Pepsi commercial tried to enforce an alleged offer to obtain a Harrier jet for 7 million company’s points (Contract Law, n.d.; Lexisondemand, 2009). The court ruled in Pepsi’s favor and decided that “no objective person could reasonably have concluded that the commercial actually offered consumers a Harrier jet” (Smallwood, 2016, para. 4). Under the objective theory of contracts, it is clear that the company was justified in not providing the man with the jet.

We will write a
custom essay
specifically for you

for only $16.05 $11/page
308 certified writers online
Learn More

There are several elements of a valid offer. The first requires two parties to make a promise, which must be clearly stated and understood by both of them. The second element that should have been contemplated by Leonard is consideration. This element of a valid contract may take a form of money or effort, and it is what distinguishes an offer from a gift (Goldman & Sigismond, 2013). Given that the company had not listed the value of the prize in their official catalogue, the plaintiff could not have expected Pepsi to honor the alleged contract (Smallwood, 2016). The third element of a contract is acceptance, which must be unambiguous. Taking into consideration the fact that the jet was absent from the catalogue, the requirement of acceptance was not met. The final element of a valid offer is mutuality. This element requires both parties to understand that they enter a legally binding agreement.

Since Leonard was unable to provide proof that the four elements were present in the alleged offer, the court’s decision to interpret the offer as invalid was not erroneous. Under these circumstances, a reasonable person could not have considered the company’s advertisement a valid offer.

References

Contract Law. (n.d.). What are the objective theory of contracts. Web.

Goldman, A., & Sigismond, W. (2013). Business law: Principles and practices. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

Lexisondemand. (2009). Pepsi Harrier jet commercial [Video file]. Web.

Smallwood, K. (2016). A Harrier jet, Pepsi, and John Leonard. Web.

Get your
100% original paper
on any topic

done in as little as
3 hours
Learn More
Print Сite this

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2020, November 20). Leonard v. PepsiCo Inc. Case and Invalid Contract. Retrieved from https://studycorgi.com/leonard-v-pepsico-inc-case-and-invalid-contract/

Work Cited

"Leonard v. PepsiCo Inc. Case and Invalid Contract." StudyCorgi, 20 Nov. 2020, studycorgi.com/leonard-v-pepsico-inc-case-and-invalid-contract/.

1. StudyCorgi. "Leonard v. PepsiCo Inc. Case and Invalid Contract." November 20, 2020. https://studycorgi.com/leonard-v-pepsico-inc-case-and-invalid-contract/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Leonard v. PepsiCo Inc. Case and Invalid Contract." November 20, 2020. https://studycorgi.com/leonard-v-pepsico-inc-case-and-invalid-contract/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2020. "Leonard v. PepsiCo Inc. Case and Invalid Contract." November 20, 2020. https://studycorgi.com/leonard-v-pepsico-inc-case-and-invalid-contract/.

References

StudyCorgi. (2020) 'Leonard v. PepsiCo Inc. Case and Invalid Contract'. 20 November.

Copy to clipboard

This paper was written and submitted to our database by a student to assist your with your own studies. You are free to use it to write your own assignment, however you must reference it properly.

If you are the original creator of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal.

Psst... Stuck with your
assignment? 😱
Susan
Online
Psst... Stuck with your assignment? 😱
Do you need an essay to be done?
Yes
What type of assignment 📝 do you need?
Yes
How many pages (words) do you need? Let's see if we can help you!
Yes