Ethics is a set of knowledge, ideas and regulations that have been developed by humanity, which characterize, from a moral point of view, the difference between right and wrong. An ethical problem is an ambiguous question about the morality of an act or opinion. The moral aspect of any dilemma can be both conducive to a decision and significantly complicate it. Social issues such as the issue of social support and the rehabilitation of juvenile delinquents present a full-fledged ethical dilemma between justice and mercy.
An example of an ethical dilemma can be found in ongoing medical practice, when a doctor must choose how to inform a patient that they are terminally ill. Difficult questions that force us to rethink the idea of real morality are questions of an ethical nature. Ethics is necessary for a public speaker as a kind of navigator that allows one to carefully choose the words for your speech. Professional speech should not only be competently constructed and attractively presented, but also show sensitivity and tolerance to ethical standards. The possibility of offending a minority member or expressing a radical point of view is simply unacceptable for a speaker.
An ethical way of preparing a speech about animal testing would be to scrutinize and weigh the information sources used for speech. Reliable and certified data is a good guarantee that the speech will not turn out to be biased and ethically unfair. At the same time, the information should be worked out and comprehended by the speaker and be directly related to the line of speech they build, that is, serve a specific purpose. It is dishonest and counter-ethical to use data that is not intended to be used by the speaker or to manipulate data to subordinate it to the purpose of the speaker.
Bonus questions: As a recent example of communication failure, I can recall my telephone experience with an old friend. The problem that stood in the way of our communication was a cash loan that she forgot to return to me. It seemed to me that during the conversation it would be impolite to mention this topic. At a certain moment, the conversation began to fill with pauses, as if we did not know what to answer to each other and how to react to each other’s remarks. At a certain moment, I had the feeling that the conversation had dragged on for a long time, but I did not stop it, having tried to suggest new topics for discussion. As a result, our dialogue ended with a sense of frustration and resentment. The main mistake that I made in communication was dishonesty to me as the leader of the conversation. I cannot openly tell my friend that I expect money from her, but I harbored a resentment that manifested itself in conversation through pauses and slow or harsh reactions. It would be ethically correct to keep the conversation going for exactly the time that it seemed comfortable, instead of prolonging it, trying to give it a comfortable dimension.