The different levels of social work all aim to achieve social justice and human well-being. However, the ways in which they accomplish this can be different, usually depending on the scope of the practice at hand. Micro-level social work, or the traditional approach, entails working closely with individuals, families, and small groups to provide one-on-one guidance for navigating social challenges (Ashcroft et al., 2021). However, both mezzo- and macro-level social work can be used to support people that experience various challenges through a broader and comprehensive approach (Hill et al., 2017). The agencies operating at these levels work with their clients on a broader scale and consider the systematic causes of social challenges and injustices that burden populations. The table below includes a breakdown of available agencies that are operating on mezzo- and macro-levels of social work.
While mezzo- and macro-level practice may often be used interchangeably, the assignment showed that the primary responsibility of social workers at the mezzo level is to help vulnerable populations at community, large group, and organizational levels. Social workers usually take on the roles of advocates and educators for their clients and work collaboratively with them to develop appropriate solutions to address the challenges that they face (Ambrose-Miller & Ashcroft, 2016). On the macro level, it is imperative that social workers look at issues from a broad perspective and engage with governmental and other agencies to improve the conditions in which people live and address inequalities on a systematic level rather than case-by-case (Miller et al., 2017). Through consistent engagement with groups and communities, it is possible for social workers to address disparities in the existing systems through a complex and interdisciplinary approach.
References
ADID. (2021). Social impact.
Ambrose-Miller, W., & Ashcroft, R. (2016). Challenges faced by social workers as members of interprofessional collaborative health care teams. Health & Social Work, 41(2), 101-109.
Ashcroft, R., Sur, D., Greeenblatt, A., & Donahue, P. (2021). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on social workers at the frontline: A survey of Canadian social workers. The British Journal of Social Work, 2021.
Hill, K. M., Erickson, C. L., Donaldson, L. P., Fogel, S. J., & Ferguson, S. M. (2017). Perceptions of macro social work education: An exploratory study of educators and practitioners. Advances in Social Work, 18(2), 522-542.
Miller, D. P., Bazzi, A. R., Allen, H. L., Martinson, M. L., Salas-Wright, C. P., Jantz, K., Crevi, K., & Rosenbloom, D. L. (2017). A social work approach to policy: Implications for population health. American Journal of Public Health, 107(S3), S243-S249.
Pradeep, M., & Sathyamurthi, K. (2017). The ‘community’ in ‘community social work.’ Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 22(9), 58-64.