This paper aims to describe journalistic mistreatment of crime victims, their relatives, and witnesses. The assessment is based on the model proposed by Emilio Viano, who argues that journalists may immensely imperil the safety of the victim and his or her mental health (Viano, 1992). We have viewed news reports issued by CNN, FOX News, and MSN. The following table presents examples of such unethical behaviour.
Judging from these results we may say that present-day reporters do not always adhere to the principles of their professional ethics. The following table illustrates the cases when print media can harm the individual who has been victimized. For the analysis, we have used the articles which have been published by one of the largest American newspapers the New York Times
Practically of these examples point to a very dangerous tendency among the US mass media. First, practically all of them tend to rely on data that has not been fully verified. Given the fact, that all these cases are still being investigated, the journalist should not reveal some of the facts to the public. Another feature, which immediately attracts attraction, is that mass media usually try to create a sensation by disclosing the most shocking details of the crime. The most glaring evidence is the gang-rape of a teenager in California. Moreover, practically in all cases, the reporters do not mention that their sources may be unreliable. Finally, the privacy of many victims appears to be of no concern for the reporters.
Reference List
Viano, E. (1992) Critical issues in victimology: international perspectives. New York: Springer.