Introduction
For a clinician, the information in this article is relevant because it helps to understand the prevalence of HIV infection, hepatitis C, and Hepatitis B among patients newly diagnosed with cancer. Therefore, there is a need for a clinician to screen patients who have just been diagnosed with cancer (Ramsey et al., 2019). The article is also relevant because it helps to explain why patients who have a previous history of viral infections have a high probability of developing other diseases. This article is also crucial because it demonstrates why adverse clinical outcomes and reactivation may be avoided by a thorough medical check on the patient.
Summarizing the Article
The article is all about the prevalence of HIV and hepatitis viruses among newly diagnosed cancer victims. According to this article, universal screening among such patients is critical to handling the viruses early enough. The article’s results argue that many newly diagnosed with cancer also have a high probability of having viral diseases such as HIV (Ramsey et al., 2019). Screening cancer patients to identify viral infections before commencing treatment is vital in the medical field. The article demonstrates that the low number of people who have not been diagnosed with HIV infections may not support such screening for newly diagnosed cancer patients.
How the Pathophysiology is Clinically Relevant
In this article, the pathophysiology is clinically relevant to the nursing practice. In this case, the article provides some critical concluding remarks for nurses. For example, the journal advises nurses to always screen cancer patients to find out whether they have other issues such as HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C viruses (Ramsey et al., 2019). In addition, the article advises nurses that most patients do not know about their viral status at screening time and should take the initiative to test such people. Nurses are also advised that prior screening may be warranted to safeguard adverse clinical outcomes and viral reactivation.
Three Key Points to Share
The three points to share in this article include the relevance of universal viral screening among newly diagnosed cancer patients and the increased costs because of such testing. Viral screening helps to treat cancer patients because their HIV status will be established. In addition, the other point is the risk factors associated with infections involving viruses such as HIV and hepatitis (Ramsey et al., 2019). Such risk factors include sexual contact and handling contaminated objects such as needles. Various demographic, behavioral, and clinical factors were linked to viral infections in this case.
Conclusion
There are some social, cultural, and ethical implications of the research in this article. The article tries to signify the relevance of in-patient nurse interaction. The relationship between the nurse and the patient is assessed from a social perspective. For example, the communication skills of patients and nurses can develop a relationship leading to therapeutic outcomes. From an ethical point of view, the article shows that it is mandatory to get tested for viruses such as HIV and hepatitis A and C (Ramsey et al., 2019). In this case, it seems people experience forced testing, which is immoral and unethical. The article provides cultural implications according to which there could be some religious groups who may not want to be tested immediately for the virus.
Reference
Ramsey, S. D., Unger, J. M., Baker, L. H., Little, R. F., Loomba, R., Hwang, J. P., Chugh, R., Konerman, M. A., Arnold, K., Menter, A. R., Thomas, E., Michels, R. M., Jorgensen, C. W., Burton, G. V., Bhadkamkar, N. A., & Hershman, D. L. (2019). Prevalence of hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and HIV infection among patients with newly diagnosed cancer from academic and community oncology practices. JAMA Oncology, 5(4), 497. Web.