Print Сite this

Political Preference for High-Technology Health Policy

Public health is a venture deeply interconnected with politics. In the United States, there is no steady association between what professionals in health discover and public principles. According to Michael Greenberg, some scientific discoveries are heralded and promptly incorporated into personal and political achievements. Other discoveries are ignored, and others are opposed by policy. By putting this statement forward, Greenberg means that there is a discrepancy in terms of personal responses to risks, media treatment of risks, and different capabilities of persons to react to health information. The task the public health scientists decide to undertake in the expedients of public health can affect both the degree to which health matters will create conflicts and the technique of solving these conflicts (Walker, 1996).

We will write a
custom essay
specifically for you

for only $16.05 $11/page
308 certified writers online
Learn More

Political heads have a penchant for high technology health principles. In the United States, there is a history of predilection for high technology in health practices. This is in contrast to primary intercession and technical issues which often hinder evidence based policies related to health. Experts in public health are frequently appointed to management positions. This is founded on the postulation that they are bestowed with technical aptitude that would generate decisions that are realistic and manifest public concern. It is presumed that such technical capability should separate them from the politics business. Appointed officials with the legal power to make policies, especially policies in public health, are anticipated to agree to the judgement of these professionals with a passion. Scientific awareness of diseases, hazard factors, and techniques to avert diseases and enhance health is not the only factor that establishes policy execution in public health (Greenberg, 1992).

There is also falsification and opposition by commercial concerns. For instance, commercial interests contradicted government attempts to establish policies that intimidate the trade in tobacco. They also opposed attempts which needed investments to safeguard workers and the general public. The continued struggle in opposition to the tobacco industry is an example of the capacity of fiscal and political authority to hold back or stop every attempt to prevent infatuation to this harmful product (Tolstoy,1904).

Michael Greenberg argues that there are many methods of making studies agreeable to the wants of policy makers. There are also many ways of making these law makers understand the wants of investigators. This is by devoting themselves to a greater assessment of the connections between investigations and policy. Many people in public health hold conflicting contextual pictures of the investigation procedure by assuming a realistic model of the policy procedure. By recognizing the impediments to research influencing policy, it becomes simpler to build plans around the distribution of research. Researchers, therefore, need to put into consideration the degree to which politics may influence how much notification policy makers take of investigation discoveries. They should take into account how far systematic indecision is in principle making. They also need to take into account matters around timing and transmission of research findings. Finally, they should identify policy makers’ temporary horizons and the necessity for open presentation of research results (Walker, 1996).

Participants in public health are required to give more concentration to the policy surrounding by looking at both the policy subject matter and the procedure. By using a policy evaluation structure, it is promising to identify and conquer the obstacles to research affecting policy. Evaluation of the political concept is crucial for the comprehension of a health policy and its victory (Greenberg, 1992).

United States has experienced uneven power frameworks and numerous modifications in government. This has destructed health facilities and has led to a federal health system that hampers broader participation and interrupts health principle making, preparation and execution. Political concept has had an adverse effect on the health policy procedure in US (Greenberg, 1992).


Greenberg, M. (1992). Impediments to basing government health policies on science in the Unites States. New York: Social Science & Medicine.

Get your
100% original paper
on any topic

done in as little as
3 hours
Learn More

Tolstoy, L. (1904). The Public Health and Welfare in the United States. Washington: US Government Printing Office.

Walker, B. (1996). The political dimensions of public health. Leadership in Public Health. Washington: American Psychological Association.

Cite this paper

Select style


StudyCorgi. (2022, April 3). Political Preference for High-Technology Health Policy. Retrieved from


StudyCorgi. (2022, April 3). Political Preference for High-Technology Health Policy.

Work Cited

"Political Preference for High-Technology Health Policy." StudyCorgi, 3 Apr. 2022,

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

1. StudyCorgi. "Political Preference for High-Technology Health Policy." April 3, 2022.


StudyCorgi. "Political Preference for High-Technology Health Policy." April 3, 2022.


StudyCorgi. 2022. "Political Preference for High-Technology Health Policy." April 3, 2022.


StudyCorgi. (2022) 'Political Preference for High-Technology Health Policy'. 3 April.

This paper was written and submitted to our database by a student to assist your with your own studies. You are free to use it to write your own assignment, however you must reference it properly.

If you are the original creator of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal.