Introduction
There are several factors involved in every efficient safety program for it to be successful. Similarly, while the workplace is still a thought put on paper, it is much more important to discuss its safety aspects. In this way, safety design evaluations and plan mitigation are all an equally critical part of the workplace’s safe operation and maintenance process. The fundamentals of these designs, when properly implemented, allow for an overall reduction in accidents as well as an improvement in business profitability by reduced operation costs, combined with enhanced productivity of the company. Early hazard detection and mitigation processes will begin showing success while the project is still in the idea stage.
Safety Design Review Process
The safety design review process’s main goal is to locate the risks (both existing and the anticipated) and find the way to avoid or alleviate the emergence of a dangerous situation. To be fully successful and efficient, the review process team should include people from diverse backgrounds who have deep insight into the safety design, construction, and operation of the end product (Lerry, 2016). One essential thing to bear in mind is how safety design assessments could also be carried out after the equipment’s initial installation and operation. Nevertheless, the refurbishing process’s related expenses may be quite high, based on the ultimate needs defined during the analysis.
The Critical Role of Safety in the Safety Program
In a safety management system, the function and necessity of security cannot be emphasized enough. A safety professional ought to be a part of the design plan from the beginning of the process to recognize the expected outcome and all the variables along the way. By doing so, the expert will identify the possible risks associated with the product more explicitly and may be able to offer practical safety recommendations. His or her role will focus on end-product research and understanding, as well as on all the detailed information involved in managing the invention, which will enable a greater understanding and prediction of future risks (Lerry, 2016). Another factor to consider is how safety experts will need to figure out the remaining dangers and why or how an incident could occur.
Concept Inter-Relation with the Safety Management Systems Approach
Individual concepts must inter-relate with the safety management systems approach since, in reality, no design is ever 100 % perfect. Because of the different persons and departments participating in the advancement of the above review process, the concepts operate in the same way as an efficient safety program by engaging individuals at various organizational levels. More importantly, there are checklists in each approach, which have been developed to enable a more in-depth assessment and protect the bases. These guidelines provide designers, engineers, and safety experts with the resources which will ensure the success of the safety design (Satria & Castro, 2016). Checklists are one of the major tools which the design review process committee should have. They are most noticeable in maintaining the attention and line of thinking among the review process team members. Introducing these lists early in the process would help steer the business away from failure and harm, thus, helping to avoid losing and failing to get proper delivery of service.
In conclusion, the safety design analysis is critical for companies. Managers should consider the cost-effectiveness of detecting hazards and form the plans to mitigate the potential risks with such disasters. Safety practitioners must have well-rounded skills to fill the gap between the concepts and structure. The system of well-being assessment process offers an opportunity to put together the ideas of welfare professionals, managers, and all other stakeholders for a single purpose of considering safety earlier in the design.
References
Lerry, P. O. (2016). Making it happen: Project management without problems [Review of book Effective project management: Traditional, agile, extreme, hybrid]. Journal of Management Studies, 236-239.
Satria, R., & Castro, M. (2016). Gis tools for analyzing accidents and road design: A review. Transportation Research Procedia, 18, 242-247. Web.