Safety Management Systems in Aviation

Bogdane, R., Gorbacovs, O., Sestakovs, V., & Arandas, I. (2019). Development of a model for assessing the level of flight safety in an airline using concept of risk. Procedia Computer Science, 149, 365-374. 

The authors consider the current state of the SMS in aviation, suggesting general approaches such as a comparative assessment based on a unified system, offering detailed calculations as a support for their argument. All of the authors have degrees in aviation, which contributes to the weight of their argument and the credibility of the paper. Moreover, the range and date of references used by the authors suggests that this article is relevant, objective, and overall well researched. Therefore, this article can be incorporated into the analysis as the source for ideas concerning the improvement of the existing SMS in aviation by integrating mathematical technological advances and models for assessment into it.

Hsu, Y. L., Li, W. C., & Chen, K. W. (2010). Structuring critical success factors of airline safety management system using a hybrid model. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 46(2), 222-235. 

The article considers an existing framework for improving airline safety and its management, in general, to examine its effects. Specifically, the article promises that a hybrid model of the Decision Making Trial Evaluation Laboratory framework and the Analytic Network Process system will improve the current situation. The authors have academic degrees, which suggests that their research is credible and reputable. Moreover, the vast range of references that they use and the amount of evidence that they pull from these sources contributes to the article’s legitimacy. The source is relevant and transparent, which suggests that it can be incorporated into the analysis. The article’s main purpose will be to offer options for improving the technological aspect of the current SMS in aviation.

Kim, H. C. (2015). Review and implementation analysis of safety management systems in aviation design: Supplemental type certificate applicants and holders. International Journal of Aviation Systems, Operations and Training (IJASOT), 2(1), 21-32. 

Kim approaches the issue of SMS from a different perspective, placing the emphasis on regulations as the main source of passengers’ security. According to the authors, a new system of notifications for safety concerns has to be implemented in aviation. The authors’ credibility is justified by their academic degrees and experiences. In turn, the reliability of the sources that they use and, therefore, the evidence that they provide to support their claims, is very high. Published recently, the paper addresses current concerns and, thus, sheds light on the dilemmas that the SMS environment may include in the future. The relevance and transparency of the article is also very high due to the ethical standards adhered to by the authors. Therefore, this resource can be used for further research to delineate regulatory options for SMS

Koteeswaran, S., Malarvizhi, N., Kannan, E., Sasikala, S., & Geetha, S. (2019). Data mining application on aviation accident data for predicting topmost causes for accidents. Cluster Computing, 22(5), 11379-11399. Web.

Koteeswaran et al. (2019) in their research approach the issue of SMS from a slightly different angle, suggesting that a system of immediate risk assessment and response should be updated to handle the challenges of the present-day security management requirements. The authors have doctoral degrees in fields relevant to aviation, which adds to the credibility of their argument. The incorporation of multiple reference and examples, in turn, increases the objectivity of the paper and provides a chance at considering multiple points of view. Moreover, the study has been published recently, which increases its relevance, and complies with the key ethical standards for research, which adds to its transparency. The study can be used to evaluate the potential contribution of specific innovations to the aviation setting.

Leva, M. C., Cahill, J., Kay, A. M., Losa, G., & McDonald, N. (2010). The advancement of a new human factors report–‘The Unique Report’–facilitating flight crew auditing of performance/operations as part of an airline’s safety management system. Ergonomics, 53(2), 164-183. Web.

The understanding of the current problems of SMS is incomplete without the assessment of the human factor and its impact on the performance of various technological advances. The study by Leva et al. (2010) encompasses the specified issue by demonstrating the connection between the incorporation of innovative technology and the necessity to train the aviation staff to develop impeccable skills of managing these tools. The authors belong to the Aerospace Psychology Research Group, which makes their arguments credible and trustworthy. Moreover, one should mention the presence of numerous references to recent research on the topic, which offer extensive support for the key statements and conclusions. Published recently and meeting basic standards for research ethics, the paper can be used to examine the effects of technology on the improvement of the SMS in aviation.

Matulevičius, R., Norta, A., & Samarütel, S. (2018). Security requirements elicitation from airline turnaround processes. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 60(1), 3-20. Web.

The necessity to establish clear criteria for security in aviation is central to providing a safe environment for passengers and staff members alike. The paper by Matulevičius et al. (2018) is devoted to the specified issue, detailing the key implications for aviation security. Namely, Matulevičius et al. (2018) consider the turnaround process as the source of essential information on effective updates for the SMS. The authors are affiliated with respectable academic institutions, which is why their research should be deemed as credible. Published recently, the article also provides an overview of the current issues and innovations, which is central to the management of SMS. Furthermore, the study incorporates relevant and recent references, which make the article and its findings especially robust. The research will be used to consider practical implications of integrating innovative tools into the SMS framework.

Petitt, K. (2017). SMS, safety culture, and the four pillars of safety applied to airline pilot training: NextGen demands to improve safety. International Journal of Aviation Systems, Operations and Training (IJASOT), 4(2), 45-61. 

Shifting toward the discussion of safety training as the basis for ensuring future security of passengers, Petitt (2017) proves that the development of safety culture within the aviation setting relies primarily on safety guidelines. Therefore, the development of appropriate regulations is central to the improvement of safeguarding measures. The author is affiliated with an academic institution, which suggests that her research is substantially credible. Moreover, the range of references used to pull evidence from represents a gamut of recent and reputable articles. Therefore, the study can be valued for its credibility. The study will be used to establish the need to revisit the existing policies for safety in aviation.

Stolzer, A. J., Halford, M. C. D., & Goglia, M. J. J. (2015). Safety management systems in aviation. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.

The book deals with the problem of safety management, in general, paying an even amount of attention to both regulatory issues and technological aspects of advancing aviation safety. The authors have academic degrees in aviation, which adds substantial credibility to the book. Namely, Stolzer has been the Dean of the College of Aviation, whereas Halford and Goglia have degrees in aviation. The robust bibliography suggests that the authors have consulted an ample number of references, which adds objectivity to this source. The book will provide a proper introduction to the current SMS issues in aviation and the role that technology and regulations play in handling them, which is critical for determining key changes to be made.

Ulfvengren, P., & Corrigan, S. (2015). Development and implementation of a safety management system in a Lean Airline. Cognition, Technology & Work, 17(2), 219-236. Web.

The introduction of lean frameworks for managing various aspects of aviation is an important advancement in handling the wide array of processes in the specified field. Therefore, the presence of a lean system allows for a smoother implementation of the airline safety standards, as Ulfvengren and Corrigan (2015) argue in their paper. The authors take important academic positions in respective institutions, which means that their article deserves credibility. Likewise, the range of resources that they incorporate into their study allows for a diversity of opinions and represent the problems faced currently in aviation. The article can be used to examine the effects of technology on the improvement in SMS.

Zheng, S., Ge, Y. E., Fu, X., Nie, Y. M., & Xie, C. (2017). Modeling collusion-proof port emission regulation of cargo-handling activities under incomplete information. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 104, 543-567. 

Sheng et al. (2017) suggest a legitimate strategy for updating the existing standards for safety in aviation by integrating innovative technological devices and activities. Representing corresponding academic institutions, the authors warrant a high level of credibility. Moreover, their study incorporates evidence from a diverse pool of academic articles that show high levels of validity and credibility. In addition, the source can be considered valid since it can be applied outside of its context to other areas, which contributes to the value of the article and the importance of its claim. Overall, the study can be utilized as an example of resolving an SMS issue with the help of technological improvements.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2022, March 30). Safety Management Systems in Aviation. https://studycorgi.com/safety-management-systems-in-aviation/

Work Cited

"Safety Management Systems in Aviation." StudyCorgi, 30 Mar. 2022, studycorgi.com/safety-management-systems-in-aviation/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2022) 'Safety Management Systems in Aviation'. 30 March.

1. StudyCorgi. "Safety Management Systems in Aviation." March 30, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/safety-management-systems-in-aviation/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Safety Management Systems in Aviation." March 30, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/safety-management-systems-in-aviation/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2022. "Safety Management Systems in Aviation." March 30, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/safety-management-systems-in-aviation/.

This paper, “Safety Management Systems in Aviation”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.