In sexology, a clear definition of the concept of norm faces specific difficulties determined by the close interweaving of biological, personal, and social factors and the extreme variability of individual deviations. The definition of sexual norm criteria is complicated due to the close interweaving of biological, social, and personal factors. They affect a person’s sexual life and the variety of individual deviations associated with it, a complex of cultural factors, religious beliefs, and ethical requirements prevailing in individual social groups or society as a whole. The boundaries of the sexual norm exist in figures, facts, documents, rules, assessments, and attitudes.
A sexologist can help a client/patient determine the limits of what is acceptable for him at a certain point in life and with a specific partner. Man has accepted some sexual norms by nature, created others, formulated them, tested many with time, and cannot now live outside of their action (Galiè & Farnworth, 2019). Therefore, I coordinated them with the immediate environment: family, friends, acquaintances, and neighbors. The boundaries of sexual norms have expanded over time to the institutional environment: social, national, religious, and other groups where this person exists with his inner circle.
Ultimately, sexual norms have embraced the world around us: countries and regions, continents and continents. Modern man has to live with numerous norms of sexual communication. By its nature, sexuality is by no means alien to power. Moreover, it has “maximum instrumentality” in this regard, a dense network of power relations between men and women, older and younger, administration and population pass through it. It is precise because of its dispersion in society. It makes its manifestations as effective and invisible to the “naked eye” as sexuality escapes from any single matrix of understanding.
Reference
Galiè, A., & Farnworth, C. R. (2019). Power through: A new concept in the empowerment discourse. Global food security, 21, 13–17. Web.