Introduction
Culture is an acquired compliment of a long interactive process. It depends on period of time in which an individual is exposed to the interactive process and level of internalization of the subculture. Reflectively, culture varies from one geographic region to another. Besides, subcultures are unique in terms of beliefs, practices, and communicative gestures or language. This analytical treatise attempts to explicitly review the historic development of the Aztecs and the Incas cultures from the primary and secondary review.
The Aztecs and the Incas
Through case study review of primary data collection, the results indicated that researcher used primary data in most cases and only referred to secondary data to reaffirm the primary information. The author’s tone and approach reflect a participatory research in analyzing the interdiction of the Inca civilization, the author brings about the question of legitimacy of the different ideologies in the then free society. The author asserts that the issue legitimacy ensures stability of the Aztecs society.
Therefore, civilization power can only be fully exercised in accordance with the deities and beliefs endorsed in the light of principles and ideals acceptable to common human reason. This framework should tolerate as well as respects others of different opinions. Hence, this provides a particular explanation for the direct involvement in research through use of primary data. These fundamental ideas from the Inca culture were then interpreted into social conception of the ideal sages that differentiated the dualist existence of hell and heaven. It was “freestanding since its content was set out independently of the comprehensive doctrines which members of the Inca culture affirmed” (Strayer, 2012, p. 34).
Unlike the hypothetical imperatives of the European invaders, the author argued that categorical imperatives motivated the community to undertake actions by the desires to complete such actions. These actions were ideal and expected of mankind, irrespective of experience since they were universal. Sociological Imagination is the intrinsic ability to surpass common view and analyze situation as they occur in the background of informed theoretical conceptualization. Thus, the author views the Inca society as a platform where conflicting and friendly occurrences interact to influence behavioral inclination, norm organization, and conflicts as a result of cut link between order and anarchy (Strayer, 2012). This view could only be informed by studying particular characteristics which are only possible when conducting primary research.
As a matter of fact, this concept liberates an individual to draw an informed understanding of the past through reflection of current events. Through sociological imagination, it is easy to understand behavior change and identify forces: positive or negative, that facilitate the angle of inclination towards the preset norm and values at individual and societal magnitude. As a matter of fact, understanding sociological imagination calls for knowledge of present and past events such as war, disaster, social injustices, and religious inclinations that helped to change history of the Inca society (Strayer, 2012).
Specifically, the Inca subculture is unique in interactive modes, language, phrases, and dressing style. Besides, most of these interactive traits are acquired in a systematic and continuous process characterized by a sense of belonging, unity for a common goal, and belief in religious ideology. By refusing to accept the European culture and declaring them unfriendly, the Inca societies had to live with the question of legitimacy in the then free society. This led to overlapping consensus in which each ‘reasonable’ American refused to affirm the European religious law within own perspective. There are specific deities and sages that define what is ideal and the contrary in the Inca community. These beliefs create a standard and uniform ground from which all members are in a position to accomplish morality in more or less the same approach. In fact, the morality will is dependent on intention and imperatives that function at every level of the society (Strayer, 2012).
This research utilized empirical research since a lot of literature on Inca culture has been captured by many authors. The work of provided the relevant secondary material for the empirical study. Series of views and approaches adopted by this author was reviewed with the intention of providing a complete understanding of Inca culture and its influence on sages, deities, hell and heaven, and discourse associated with the modern American culture. Since the orientations in the Inca tradition balances the contrary extreme habits to maintain beneficial friendship despite assuming a compromising ground for religious actions, it was necessary to establish the link to modern Inca culture. There are specific deities and sages that define what is ideal and the contrary (Strayer, 2012). These beliefs create a standard and uniform ground from which all members are in a position to accomplish morality in more or less the same approach.
Conclusion
Conclusively, a subculture defines physical and spiritual interactive traits of its members who are united by a sense of belonging and desire for identity. The subcultures of the invaders and the Incas are unique in practices surrounding language, dressing style, religious affiliation, and philosophical beliefs of the Aztecs and the Incas cultures.
Reference
Strayer, R. (2012). Ways of the world. Web.