Kranz, A. M., Dalton, S., Damberg, C., & Timbie, J. W. (2018). Using health IT to coordinate care and improve quality in safety-net clinics. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 44(12), 731-740.
This journal examines the significance of IT in coordinating care and improving quality in safe-net clinics. Kranz, Dalton, Damberg, and Timbie (2018) sought to investigate how electronic health record systems facilitate clinicians in accomplishing their primary tasks. The journal then talks about the method that was implemented. The researchers used secondary cross-sectional data obtained from the 2015 Health Resources and Services Administration Uniform data system. Kranz et al. (2018) used this information to examine six measures of EHRs’ capability to enhance care coordination and clinical decision support.
The study results showed that medical centers provided affordable and wide-ranging healthcare and supportive services to over 25 million Americans from low-income families. The authors note that the adoption of IT has improved considerably in recent years, mentioning that 29.8% of health centers in the United States implemented EHRs as compared to 95.3% in 2016 (Kranz et al., 2018). The journal reveals that many clinicians rely on electronic health record systems to manage lab tests, such as requesting laboratory tests.
The authors then concluded that electronic health record systems still need improvement to provide their users with optimal satisfaction and enhanced usefulness. The survey also showed that the physicians needed to improve the functionalities of the electronic health record system. Comparatively, the source contains few benefits than the other two. The advantages of electronic health records have not been well supported by the authors to provide a solid argument. Nonetheless, the study is credible because it is up-to-date, methodologically coherent, and contains scholarly publications relevant to the subject of electronic health records.
Casey, J. A., Schwartz, B. S., Stewart, W. F., & Adler, N. E. (2016). Using electronic health records for population health research: A review of methods and applications. Annual Review of Public Health, 37.
The work of Casey, Schwartz, Stewart, & Adler (2016) sought to examine the link between the application of electronic health records’ on hospital population and evaluation of its benefits and drawback of its implementation to this objective. The article mentions that the use of EHRs has spread vastly across many healthcare centers in the past decade. The authors explain the meaning of electronic health records and population health while providing support for their definition. The aim of the study involved reviewing literature published previously on the effects of electronic health records on population health. The journal outlines the method they used for the survey. The authors examine the use of EHRs in population health research by relating them to conventional healthcare records.
The results are well displayed in a table, showing the benefits and drawbacks. The findings unveiled that that electronic health records had more advantages than barriers to population health. The significant benefits that formed the basis of my research were; electronic health records increase productivity or efficiency and increase data quality. Precisely, data in electronic health records have fewer errors, are accurate and more precise, and improve efficiency in the storage, accessibility, and retrieval of patient information. For instance, Casey et al. (2016) noted that EHRs were useful in defining the onset of a disease, enabling healthcare professionals to determine appropriate care and control measures while controlling the outcomes.
Major drawbacks of electronic health records included recall bias (defective information), lack of interoperability standards, and loss of productivity. Nonetheless, the journal is reliable because it is up-to-date and contains scholarly publications relevant to the vital subject. The research approach and methodology were also incredible, providing critical insights into the implementation of electronic healthcare records to boost the provision of medical services.
Cline, L. (2020). How electronic health records correlate with patient-centered care. Nursing2020, 50(1), 61-63.
Laura Cline journal describes the correlation between electronic health records (EHRs) and patient-centred care. The author mentions that EHRs play a significant role in tracking the quality of care using well-research and documented medical records. Cline (2020) notes that integrating this technology in healthcare significantly improves patient care. However, the author insists that nurse training is also essential in realizing the impact of EHRs on patient-centered care. She argues that electronic health records have many benefits that cannot be underestimated in the provision of quality medical services.
The journal highlights the benefits of integrating EHR technology in patient care. One of the most notable advantages of EHRs is legibility, which she supports by arguing that handwritten documents can cause medication errors. Cline (2016) also asserts that electronic health records can help manage medication, thus, improving the patient’s outcome. She also mentions that electronic health records enable health providers to assess diagnosis procedures and determine whether to repeat lab tests. Another benefit of electronic health is the simplification of notifications for nurses. Electronic health records simplify notifications by flagging critical value and ensuring that all documentation is correct and completed. Lastly, her research shows that electronic health records improve clinical and treatment outcomes by enhancing overall efficiency and reducing duplicate tests.
The author also elaborates on the benefits of electronic health records to patients, which emphasizes my research. Cline (2016) postulates that electronic health records have simplified the process of keeping patient information. They have enhanced recordkeeping by improving information security and increasing accountability through audit trail and showing detail of who last accessed the patients’ medical records. Electronic health records security also prevents unauthorized personnel from accessing patients’ records. The author also mentions that electronic health records enable patients to be their advocates because they can access and read their health information.